Cases

1 A DM/ -3_ 05 F'r'-Em~ -.IA/ T/s/[ L//!//YEO §T,QYES F§}Mv/) L”bu 27 oFAszWSc " mm Of A¢Pea!s k - : z ~' "'}`*f/~L?F§w/(,QT[ pF flip/95 v'& CDU r)// Of AFFE.d/S -JUN 0 5 2075 bd V' d .» __:Fé?(‘§r`:k`éh€~, Texas E$/QW L/QmPK/>¢’ /0/205[ § jf/’z’//m¢€ L’,Quj@ A/DGZ€@'@“K.MMQ;<,©L@-nk L’~Leme/Nj L/M/`7 sr _D~é._/"/.DQOZ_V_£@ . F¢.s:z~;wi¢?§ @44;/ 5 ,OL//g 5“?/ f /? 121 @GUSE /lfp 72/57 7 (£/ nw :\hi?§\`%%£R/*/[D 74 7 q/'07 m///\/q /Al? V/J€S /O(VA [/DU(( mm il 4 'i`@""

^»s . Sixth District No.Qk-il-onoxHJ.a Thes™r,s J1W2 5y TAf IHECn.iRToF APPEAL JON 2 52015 rot? THFf>rtTHArpF,\\AiE "T-arK.ma, Texas , • ,»-j~ TPV'A/? l^A aI A pfotof TexarkanaTexa, lexarkana, Texas Lra Autrey, Cleric °J. / f-XAKKflAIA - Debra K. Autre

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Care Alternative, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. *625[Docket Item 27.] Plaintiff-Relators are former employees of Defendant, a provider of end-of-life hospice care throughout New Jersey. They bring claims on behal

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 16-2015 ___________ LEONARD COTTRELL; SANDRA HENON; WILLIAM REEVES; GEORGE HERMAN; SIMON NAZZAL; CAROL FREBURGER; JACK LIGGETT; PATRICIA BOUGH; MACK BROWN; DOLORES GILLESPIE; DEBORAH HARRINGTON; ROBERT INGINO; EDWARD ROGERS, JR.; DEBORAH RUSIGNULOLO; DOROTHY STOKES; JOSEPHINE TROCCOLI; HUR

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Plaintiff VFS Financing, Inc. (“VFS”) seeks a turnover order enabling it to reach two assets of its debtor, defendant Richard Fox (“Fox”): an “SRA/IRA” retirement account containing approximately $600,000 and a joint marital cash account containing approximately $7,000. VFS seeks this order in partial satisfaction of a $2.4 million judgment i

The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J. This appeal involves a claim for a constitutional violation brought under 42 U.S.C.A § 1983 (Section 1983). We are asked primarily to decide whether sufficient probable cause existed to arrest Frank Schneider, Jr. (plaintiff) and, if not, whether defendants otherwise are entitled to qualified immunity. We must also revisit our summary judgment st

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0921-24 A-1568-24 MEGAN MCDERMOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross- Respondent, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION December 2

128 F.3d 810 Ronald E. SHARRAR; Gerard A. Sweeney; David L. Brigden;Kenneth J. Sharrar,v.Dennis FELSING, Sgt., Individually and as an officer of theSea Isle City Police Department; William Kennedy, DetectiveSgt., Individually and as an officer of Sea Isle City PoliceDepartment; Albert Wilson, Lt., Individually and as anofficer of the Sea Isle City Police Department; MichaelLarkin, Sgt., Individually and as an of

OPALA, Justice, dissenting. The court declares that personal actions1 by governmental entities subordinate to the state, who sue in a “sovereign capacity to protect vested public rights,” are unaffected by statutory limitations. I cannot accede to today’s departure from the general rule of the common-law which holds that, absent contrary legislation, only the state is protected