Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LAMONDS v. HALL”
McLain v. City of Somervillepublic domain
424 F.Supp.2d 329 (2006) Thomas McLAIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SOMERVILLE, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 04-11833-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 3, 2006. *330 James F. Lamond, McDonald, Lamond & Cazoneri, Southborough, Alan J. Mc-Donald, McDonald, Lamond & Cazoneri, Southborough, MA, for Thomas McLain,
United States v. 94 Ltd.public domain
ORDER The opinion of the three-judge panel is vacated and the appeal is dismissed as moot.
State v. Peterspublic domain
[Cite as State v. Peters, 2019-Ohio-4461.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108068 v. : DALE PETERS, :
State v. Fullerpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Fuller, 2013-Ohio-3274.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 25380 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 10-CR-2328/1 v.
Eric Lamond Davis v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-09-00033-CR
United States v. Lamond D. Kelleypublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. Following a final revocation hearing, the district court found Lamond Kelley guilty of battery, aggravated assault, and unlawful use of a weapon — all Grade A violations 1 of the conditions of his supervised release. These Grade A violations combined with Kelley’s criminal history category of IV to
Martin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.public domain
709 F.Supp.2d 345 (2010) Jo-Anna Lynn MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-2053 (RMB/AMD). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 30, 2010. *346 Barry Joel Hockfield, Hockfield, Hasner & Associates, PA, Cherry Hill, NJ, for Plaintiff. Roberto K. Paglione, McDo
DENNIS, Circuit Judge: A Federal Grand Jury returned a three-count indictment charging defendant-appellant Jerry Lee Quinn with one count of suborning Santonio Lamond Walker to commit perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1622 (Count 1), and charging defendant-appellant Walker with two counts of knowingly making false material declarations while under oath, in violation of 18 U.S.C
Bellinger v. Bowserpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRANCEL BELLINGER et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-2124 (TJK) MURIEL BOWSER et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Francel Bellinger and Iola Anyan (the “Individual Plaintiffs”), and Plaintiffs SE-NE Friends of the Capitol Vie
United States v. Dardenpublic domain
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On November 2, 2018, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Omnibus Order *706(Doc. No. 823) that resolved most of the pending motions in this case. The remaining Motions were set for oral arguments or evidentiary hearings, and they were held during the last week of November 2018.
Joseph Anthony Sampson v. Statepublic domain
Opinion issued March 17, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The
United States v. Kelley, Lamondpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-1884 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAMOND D. KELLEY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dist
Whitten Foundation v. Grangerpublic domain
950 So.2d 720 (2006) WHITTEN FOUNDATION v. Frank GRANGER, III, in His Capacity as Tax Assessor for East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana; the Louisiana Tax Commission; & Elmer Litchfield in His Capacity as Sheriff & Ex-Officio Tax Collector for East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. No. 2004 CA 0934R. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. November 3, 2006.
JB v. ASARCO, Inc.public domain
ORDER CLEARY, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter came before the undersigned on November 1, 2004, for hearing on the Motion to Compel Production of Documents [Dkt. # 171] filed by Defendants ASARCO Incorporated (“ASARCO”), Blue Tee Corp., Doe Run Resources, Inc., and Gold Fields Mining Corporation (hereafter, referred to jointly as “Defendants”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion
Cranford v. Kluttzpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, JR., District Judge This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendants Eddie Kluttz (“Defendant Kluttz”) and Reese Helms (“Defendant Helms”) have moved for summary judgment (Doc. 22), to which Plaintiff Brian Cranford has responded (Doc. 31), and *853Defendants have
Hampton v. Statepublic domain
2009 OK CR 4 JERRY LYNN HAMPTON, Appellant v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee No. RE-2007-555. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Decided: February 23, 2009. Maria Blakely Hugo, Oklahoma, Attorney for Defendant Bill J. Baze, Okla. Indigent Defense System Norman, Oklahoma, Attorney for Appellant Joe R. Watkins, Assistant District Attorney Hugo, Oklahoma
Nelson v. Hernandezpublic domain
524 F.Supp.2d 212 (2007) Kevin NELSON, Plaintiff, v. Special Agent Fnu HERNANDEZ and Special Agent John Chang of the United States Department of the Treasury Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 241 37th Street, Brooklyn, NY; and Detective David Intrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration Joint Firearms, Defendants. No. 03 CV 5773(NG)(RML). United States District Court, E.D. New York.</
Kemp v. Blockpublic domain
607 F.Supp. 1262 (1985) Robert Alan KEMP, Plaintiff, v. William BLOCK, Defendant. No. CV-R-82-399-ECR. United States District Court, D. Nevada. April 29, 1985. *1263 Lawrence J. Semenza, Reno, Nev., for plaintiff. Lamond R. Mills, U.S. Atty. by Shirley Smith, Asst., Reno, Nev., for defendant. MEMORANDUM DEC
United States v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation Districtpublic domain
OPINION BELLONI, District Judge. Nature of Motion The United States and the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe (“Tribe”) filed this action in 1973 to quiet title to the water rights of all users to the Truckee River. United States District Judge Blaine Anderson subsequently ruled that plaintiffs’ claims for water rights to the Truckee River were the same claims litigated earlier in U
Adventure Resources, Inc. v. Hollandpublic domain
OPINION K.K HALL, Senior Circuit Judge: The primary question before us in this appeal is whether a debtor in bankruptcy operating under the aegis of Chapter 11 may, with regard to an executory contract in effect at the time of the filing of the petition for reorganization, continue to reap the benefits of its bargain without concern that the non-debto