⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “L.Y.P.A. v. Doe Run Resources Corporation, The”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023-04-12 · Published · cited 2× · 65 F.4th 370
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1848 ___________________________ Chris Collins, as Next Friend of: J.Y.C.C.; I.K.C.C.; E.A.C.C.; E.L.C.C.; A.R.C.C.; J.R.G.; F.R.A.; R.F.R.C.; S.S.L.; R.D.L.C.; G.N.A.A.; H.G.A.L.; A.X.E.A.; M.Z.A.B.; A.Y.A.G.; I.D.A.A.; J.D.A.E.; Y.D.T.; E.J.D.L.C.D.; N.G.C.V.; Y.G.C.F.; C.P
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024-08-01 · Published · cited 1× · 110 F.4th 1049
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1625 ___________________________ Sr. Kate Reid; Megan Heeney, as next friends of; A. O. A.; Meylith A. Caso Arroyo; Y. C. A.; A. C. C.; D. R. G.; J. R. G.; S. A. L.; Jean P. Quispe Morales; B. Q. M. Pla
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1625 ___________________________ Sr. Kate Reid; Megan Heeney, as next friends of; A. O. A.; Meylith A. Caso Arroyo; Y. C. A.; A. C. C.; D. R. G.; J. R. G.; S. A. L.; Jean P. Quispe Morales; B. Q. M. Pla
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2026-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 24-13266 Document: 91-1 Date Filed: 01/21/2026 Page: 1 of 21 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-13266 ____________________ In re: THE RENCO GROUP INC. AND THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION. __
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 380 F. Supp. 3d 921
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs in this matter are more than sixteen hundred Peruvian children who live near Defendants' lead smelter in La Oroya, Peru. Plaintiffs allege that they were injured after being exposed to toxic lead emissions from the smelter. The corporate defendants are United States companies, who through their Peruvian subsidiary, owned and operated the lead smelting and refining complex. Th
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019-02-11 · Published · cited 1× · 370 F. Supp. 3d 1031
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs in this matter are more than sixteen hundred Peruvian children who live near Defendants' lead smelter in La *1036Oroya, Peru. Plaintiffs allege that they were injured after being exposed to toxic lead emissions from the smelter. The corporate defendants are United States companies, wh
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012-11-13 · Published · cited 61× · 701 F.3d 840; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23281
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Doe Run Resources and its affiliates operated a smelting facility in Peru. The facility’s pollution allegedly injured the plaintiffs. A Doe Run associate, Renco, is currently arbitrating related claims with Peru. The defendants sought both a mandatory and discretionary stay of this case pending the outcome of the arbitration. The district court
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2011-06-22 · Published · cited 0× · 833 F. Supp. 2d 1126; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66691; 2011 WL 2553259
MEMORANDUM OPINION CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. Plaintiffs are numerous Peruvian children who allege that they have been injured by exposure to toxic substances from the La Oroya Complex, a metallurgical smelting and refining complex operating in La Oroya, Peru. Through their next friends, they filed these eleven actions in Missouri state court, alleging state tort claims against the American co
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
Su the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE THE DOE RUN RESOURCES ) No. ED103026 CORPORATION, ) ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County VS. ) 10SL-CC01716 ) AMERICAN GUARANTEE & ) Honorable Thomas J. Prebil LIABILITY INSURANCE and ) LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants, ) ) ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Filed: September 27, 2016 Appellant. ) OPINION This is an insurance coverage case. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-01-05 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1716 Doc: 52 Filed: 01/05/2023 Pg: 1 of 39 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1715 GERALD W. CORDER; MARLYN C. SIGMON; GARNET C. COTTRILL; RANDALL M. CORDER; JANET C. PACKARD; LORENA KRAFFT; CHERYL MORRIS; TRACY BRIDGE; ANG
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-01-05 · Published · cited 58× · 57 F.4th 384
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1715 Doc: 54 Filed: 01/05/2023 Pg: 1 of 39 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1715 GERALD W. CORDER; MARLYN C. SIGMON; GARNET C. COTTRILL; RANDALL M. CORDER; JANET C. PACKARD; LORENA KRAFFT; CHERYL MORRIS; TRACY BRIDGE; ANG
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2022-08-03 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00310-CV YATES ENERGY CORPORATION, EOG Resources, Inc., Jalapeno Corporation, ACG3 Mineral Interests, Ltd., Glassell Non-Operated Interests, Ltd., and Curry Glassell, Appellants v.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-01-31 · Published · cited 12× · 127 F.4th 784
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES HUNTSMAN, No. 21-56056 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-02504- v. SVW-SK CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF OPINION JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Di
Texas Supreme Court · 2022-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 20-0451 ══════════ Energen Resources Corporation, Petitioner, v. Bryce J. Wallace, Elite Drillers Corporation, and United Fire & Casualty and Its Parent, United Fire Group, Inc., Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Pe
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2022-06-16 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 WY 72
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 72 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2022 June 16, 2022 SKYCO RESOURCES, LLP, a Texas limited liability partnership, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. S-21-0161 FAMILY TREE CORPORATION
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017-03-03 · Published · cited 9× · 2017 WY 24; 389 P.3d 1218; 2017 WL 837236; 2017 Wyo. LEXIS 24
HILL, Justice. [¶1] Anadarko Land Corporation (Anadar-ko) appeals a district court decision upholding the validity of a 1911 Laramie County tax assessment against minerals owned by Ana-darko’s predecessor, as well as the tax sale and tax deed that eventually emanated from the failure to pay those taxes. We affirm, ISSUE 112] Anadarko presents a single issue on appeal:
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2018-05-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 02-18-00178-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 5/24/2018 2:13 PM
Supreme Court of the United States · 2026-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEARNING RESOURCES, INC., et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 25-1248 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 8, 9
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-07-11 · Published · cited 0× · 196 F. Supp. 3d 87; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89291; 2016 WL 3747529
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Covey Run, LLC (“Covey Run” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action alleging that Defendants Washington Capital, LLC (‘Washington Capital”), Jemel Lyles, Melvin Sanders, and Steve Evans (collectively, the Washington Defendants”) perpetrated a fraudulent scheme that culminated in