Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kylie R. Jackson”
In Re Kylie H.public domain
07/15/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 1, 2022 IN RE KYLIE H. ET AL. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Dyer County No. 7565 Jason L. Hudson, Judge
OPINION JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief Justice. The jury found Kylie Lorraine Michell a/k/a Kylie Brown guilty of the offense of continuous sexual abuse of a young child or children. The victims were her stepdaughter and her stepson, both of whom *557 were under the age of fourteen. A
in Re Richard W. Jackson and Lisa C. Jacksonpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-17-00849-CV 03-17-00849-CV 21307607 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/14/
in Re Richard W. Jackson and Lisa C. Jacksonpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-17-00849-CV 21317505 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
in Re Richard W. Jackson and Lisa C. Jacksonpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-17-00849-CV 21317390 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/15/2017 10:54 AM
In re R.L.public domain
[Cite as In re R.L., 2022-Ohio-1179.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT IN RE: R.L. JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J.
United States v. Jeremy Jacksonpublic domain
KANNE, Circuit Judge. The government brought charges related to a methamphetamine-distribution conspiracy in southern Indiana against nineteen people, fifteen of whom pled guilty to at least one charge. The remaining four— the defendants-appellants here—went to trial. A jury convicted them. The defendants raise five arguments on appeal—three concerning the
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0629 ══════════ State of Texas; Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas; Texas Medical Board; and Stephen Brint Carlton, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Medical Board, Appellants, v. Amanda Zurawski; Lauren Mil
Clare Sikora v. City of Rawlinspublic domain
HILL, Justice. [¶1] Clare Sikora filed a declaratory judgment action against the City of Rawlins challenging the City’s issuance of a building permit to her next door neighbors, Jared and Kasandra Ramsey. The district court ruled in favor of the City, finding: 1) Ms. Sikora failed to exhaust her administrative remedies; 2) Ms. Sikora failed to join indispensable parties (the Ram
Trantham v. Super T. Transp., Inc.public domain
Babcock, Judge This matter is before me on Defendants Manweiler Transport Inc. and Paul Hamelin's ("Moving Defendants") Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. (Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 59.) Defendants Super T. Transport, Inc. and Layne Walters ("Opposing Defendants") filed a Response. (Defs.' Resp., ECF No. 60.) Plaintiff did not respond to Moving Defendants' Motion. For reasons explained below, I will not conside
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0629 ══════════ State of Texas; Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas; Texas Medical Board; and Stephen Brint Carlton, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Medical Board, Appellants, v. Amanda Zurawski; Lauren Miller; Lauren
State v. Schillingpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Schilling, 2025-Ohio-2160.] COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, : JUDGES: : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.
William Myre v. Oxford Cmty. Sch. Dist.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0065p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JEFFREY FRANZ, et al. (23-1483/1563); STEVE ST. │ JULIANA, et al. (23-
OPINION JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief Justice. The jury found Cass Anova Brown guilty of the offense of continuous sexual abuse of a young child or children. The victims were his daughter and his son, both of whom were under the age of fourteen. Appellant elected to have the trial court assess his punishment, and it assessed his punishment at imprisonment for lif
People v. Raineypublic domain
2025 IL App (1st) 231769 No. 1-23-1769 Filed September 24, 2025 Third Division IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTR
Burley v. Kytec Innovative Sports Equipment, Inc.public domain
KONENKAMP, Justice. [¶ 1.] Plaintiff was injured when a sports product manufactured by defendant malfunctioned and struck her arm. She brought suit against defendant alleging negligence, strict liability (defective design), and strict liability (failure to warn). Defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims and also sought to prohibit the testimony of her proposed expert witness. On finding that plaintiffs expert was not
Salvador Garza Jr. v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-23-00122-CR ________________ SALVADOR GARZA JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _____________________________________________
Evanston Insurance v. Wattspublic domain
ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. I. Introduction This matter comes before the court on cross motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff, Evanston Insurance Company, (“Evanston”) and Defendants Agape Senior Primary Care (“ASPC”), Floyd Cribbs, Kezia Nixon, and Scott Middleton (“collectively Agape Defendants”). In 2013, Evanston brought this declara
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Robinson, 2019-Ohio-387.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-170147 TRIAL NO. B-1603067 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : O P I N I O N. DARYL SHAREEF ROBINSON, : Defe
State v. Felixpublic domain
DAVID T. PROSSER, J. ¶ 53. (concurring). In Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 576 (1980), the United States Supreme Court held that "the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution . . . prohibits the police from making a warrantless and non-consensual entry into a suspect's home in order to make a routine felony arrest." (Emphasis added.) The Court added that it had "no occasion to consider the sort o