Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kyle R. Harris”
In re Kylepublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER OVERRULING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTIONS TO DEBTOR’S CLAIMED EXEMPTION IN REAL ESTATE (docs. 18, 21) LAWRENCE S. WALTER, Bankruptcy Judge. On March 27, 2013, approximately a week before Debtor Traci Kyle (“Debtor”) filed her Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, Ohio House Bill 479 went into effect thereby amending Ohio Rev.Code § 2329.66(A)(1) to increase the Ohio homestead exemption from $21,625.00 to $1
Austin Kyle Harris v. Sydney Michaela Harrispublic domain
Opinion filed July 18, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-24-00187-CV ___________ AUSTIN KYLE HARRIS, Appellant V. SYDNEY MICHAELA HARRIS, Appellee On Appeal from the 318th District Court Midl
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 29, 2016 No. 04-16-00636-CV Kevin W. LILES, Bryan K. Harris, Stuart R. White, James L. Ray and Kyle D. Giacco, Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS,
Lakewood Property Owners' Ass'n v. Kylepublic domain
EDWIN A. LOMBARD, Judge. |, The Appellants, Kyle and Christine Smith (“the Smiths”), seek review of two district court judgments: a September 8, 2014 judgment granting an injunction in favor of the Appellees, Lakewood Property Owners Association (“LPOA”)1 and Mark Samuels (“Mr. Samuels”); and a December 16, 2014 judgment granting the Appellees’ costs in the amount of $3,960. Furthermore, the Appe
Kyle v. Holston Grouppublic domain
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 15th day of April 2008 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
Kyle v. Holston Grouppublic domain
I. FACTS and PROCEDURE Plaintiff Eddie R. Kyle suffered a work-related back injury on 6 August 2001 while employed as a truck driver by Defendant Holston Group. He was 46 years old at the time and his average weekly wages were $838.53. Defendant accepted responsibility for the injury, and Plaintiff did not retain legal counsel. Following the injury, Plaintiff received medical treatment, including lumbar spinal fusion surgery performed 31 October 2001. Based on
Kyle v. Holston Grouppublic domain
* * * * * * * * * * * The undersigned reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Griffin. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Griffin with minor modificati
Opinion by Judge TERRY. T1 As an issue of first impression, we conclude that a repair vendor that brought a claim against an insurer on behalf of its insured is a "first-party claimant" under seetion 10-23-1115, C.R.$8.2012, and is entitled to sue the insurer under section 10-3-1116, C.R.S8.2012. T2 Plaintiff, Kyle W. Larson Enterprises, Inc., doing business as The Roofing Experts (Roofer),
Sawczyn v. BMO Harris Bank National Ass'npublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge. INTRODUCTION In this action, Plaintiff Steve Sawczyn alleges the automated teller machines (“ATMs”) of Defendant BMO Harris Bank National Association (“BMO”) were not ac*1110cessible to him as a legally blind individual, in violation of Title III of the Americans
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 12, 2018 No. 04-16-00636-CV Kevin W. LILES, Bryan K. Harris, Stuart R. White, James L. Ray and Kyle D. Giacco Appellants / Cross-Appellees, v. Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS as next friend and guardian of Samara Isabel
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-16-00636-CV Kevin W. LILES, Bryan K. Harris, Stuart R. White, James L. Ray, and Kyle D. Giacco, Appellants v. Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS as Next Friend and Guardian of Samara Isabella Morales
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 1, 2017 No. 04-16-00636-CV Kevin W. LILES, Bryan K. Harris, Stuart R. White, James L. Ray and Kyle D. Giacco (Cross- Appellees), Appellants v. Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS as next friend and guardian
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 6, 2017 No. 04-16-00636-CV Kevin W. LILES, Bryan K. Harris, Stuart R. White, James L. Ray and Kyle D. Giacco (Cross-Appellees), Appellants v. Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS as next friend an
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-16-00636-CV Kevin W. LILES, Bryan K. Harris, Stuart R. White, James L. Ray, and Kyle D. Giacco, Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS, as Next Friend and Guardian of Samara I
Riley v. Bmo Harris Bank, N.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Johnetta Riley, filed suit against Missouri Bank and Trust (“MBT”), BMO Harris Bank, N.A., and First Premier Bank seeking to recover damages and declaratory and injunctive relief on behalf of herself and members of the class of individuals who have been injured by Defendants’ al
Riley v. Bmo Harris Bank, N.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Johnetta Riley, filed suit against BMO Harris Bank, N.A., First Premier Bank, and Missouri Bank and Trust (collectively, “Defendants”) seeking to recover damages and declaratory and injunctive relief on behalf of herself and members of the class of individuals who have bee
Kyle K. v. Britton Dennispublic domain
RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from the denial of a Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss on qualified immunity grounds a complaint that alleged a substantive due process denial of medical treatment claim and physical abuse claim. This section 1983 complaint was brought on behalf of Kyle K., a mentally retarded child born in 1981, by his parents, against
BLAK Invs. v. Comm'rpublic domain
BLAK INVESTMENTS, KYLE W. MANROE TRUST, ROBERT AND LORI MANROE, TRUSTEES, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentBLAK Invs. v. Comm'rNo. 1283-07United States Tax Court
OPINION The trial court dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, a lawsuit filed by appellant, W.W. Webber, L.L.C. ("Webber"), against a governmental entity, appellee Harris County Toll Road Authority ("HCTRA"), for breach of contract and quantummeruit. On appeal, Webber contends HCTRA waived its governmental immunity by conduct. Because the Texas Supreme Court has already rejected waiver by conduct under similar facts, we affirm.
in Re Kyle Frenchpublic domain
Order filed January 26, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00038-CV IN RE KYLE FRENCH, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-83581