Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kyle R. Conrad”
905 N.E.2d 40 (2009) TRU-CAL, INC., Appellant-Plaintiff, v. CONRAD KACSIK INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee-Defendant. No. 29A04-0809-CV-511. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 29, 2009. *41 Jeffrey R. Gaither, Paul D. Vink, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. William E. Wendling, Jr.
Sammons v. Conrad and Leachpublic domain
*115 ON PETITION TO TRANSFER BOEHM, Justice. Factual and Procedural Background Newton Circuit Court Judge Robert Smart died on February 25, 2000. Judge Smart was last re-elected in 1998 and his current term would have expired December 31, 2004. Within ten days of Judge
J. Conrad LTD v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 20-79 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE J. CONRAD LTD, Plaintiff, v. Ct. No. 20-00052 UNITED STATES et al., Defendants. Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge, and Jennifer Choe-Groves and M. Miller Baker, Judges METROPOLITAN STAPLE CORP., Plaintiff,
Whitney Bank v. SCC Kyle Partners, Ltd.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEE YEAKEL, District Judge. Before the court is the above styled and numbered consolidated bankruptcy appeal.1 Appellant Whitney Bank, Successor by Merger to Whitney National Bank, Individually and as Agent for Certain Pre-petition Lenders, (“Whitney Bank”) contends that the bankruptcy court erred in
Binsfeld v. Conradpublic domain
2004 WI App 77 Donald R. Binsfeld and Cynthia M. Binsfeld, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Regent Insurance Company, Involuntary-Plaintiff-Co-Appellant, v. Donald S. Conrad and ABC Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents, John P. Mortensen, Anthony F. Mortensen, d/b/a Mortensen Properties, and JKL Insurance Company, Defendants. No. 03-1077. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submi
Bailey, Judge. Case Summary [1] Great Lakes Anesthesia, P.C. ("Great Lakes") brings an interlocutory appeal to challenge the denial of its motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain its former employees, Kyle O'Bryan and Megan O'Bryan ("the O'Bryans"), from performing nurse-anesthesia services for Associated Anesthesiologists of Fort Wayne ("AAFW") at Marion Ge
Conrad v. Wilsonpublic domain
OPINION This is a mandamus proceeding involving discovery and the procedures required to successfully resist that discovery. The underlying suit is a medical malpractice action. In the afternoon of July 15, 1992, Kenneth *Page 468 W. Casey was taken to the emergency room of Memorial Medical Center of East Texas [Medical Center] and evaluated by Dr. Kyle T. Demler. Kenneth Casey was admitted to the Medical Center t
Michalowski v. Rutherfordpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER U.S. District Judge Joan H. Lefkow On February 10, 2014, Edmund Micha-lowski filed suit against then-Illinois State Treasurer Dan Rutherford and Kyle Ham, Michalowski’s direct supervisor, alleging violations of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt.l.) The court dismissed Michalow-
Dunkel v. Mt. Carbon/North Manheim Fire Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge. Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs civil rights complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. 13). This matter is fully briefed and ripe for disposition. For the following reasons, the court will grant in part and deny in part the motion to dis
DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________
Anstine & Musgrove, Inc. v. Calcasieu Refining Co.public domain
436 B.R. 136 (2010) ANSTINE & MUSGROVE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CALCASIEU REFINING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 10-1173-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 8, 2010. *137 W. Rick Griffin, Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP, Wichita, KS, Kyle A. Lonergan, Peter S. Goodman, McKool Smit
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kyle, et al. v. Case No. 19-cv-646-PB Opinion No. 2020 DNH 058 Linden Care, LLC, and Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases 1 allege they became dependent on a prescribed under-the-tongue fentanyl spray, Subsys, and later suffered with
Crawford v. Senex Law, P.C.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Glen E. Conrad, Chief United States District Judge Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (the “FDCPA”). The matter is currently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated, the motion will be denied. Background The following summary of the facts, take
United States v. Hayespublic domain
Glen E. Conrad, Senior United States District Judge Harvey Lee Hayes, Jr., through counsel, has filed an amended motion to vacate his federal conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The matter is presently before the court on the threshold issue of whether the motion is successive for purposes of § 2255(h). The issue ha
817 F.Supp.2d 418 (2011) SRI INTERNATIONAL INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., a Georgia corporation, Symantec Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Internet Security Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Civ. No. 04-1199-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. October 4, 2011.
Jones v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice Appellant Cornelius Lamont Jones challenges his conviction for capital murder. He takes issue with the sufficiency of the evidence, an evidentiary ruling, the trial court’s denial of his request to charge the jury on spoliation, and the trial court’s denial of jury-selection challenges. Concluding these issues afford no basis for appellate relief, we affirm. <
MEMORANDUM OPINION Glen E. Conrad, Chief United States District Judge On the fourth day of a bifurcated trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Concordia Pharmaceuticals, Inc: (“Concordia”), on its claim that the defendants, Method Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Defendant Method”) and Matthew Scott Tucker (“Defendant Tucker, and collectively, “Method”), engaged in false advertising in violation o
State v. Nealpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Neal, 2017-Ohio-8444.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Craig
State v. Kowalpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Kowal, 2022-Ohio-180.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Patricia A.
Chadwell v. Brewerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief Judge. This case arises from Plaintiff Kelly Chadwell’s termination from- his position as a special education teacher in Lee County, Virginia. Chadwell alleges that the individual defendants violated his constitutional rights, and that the Lee County School Board (“Lee County”) violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). The case is presently bef