Cases

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-2657 _____________________________ MELISSA L. KYLE, Petitioner, v. HUBERT C. CARTER JR., Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction. November 9, 2023 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. RAY, BILBREY, and NORDBY, J

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-0631 _____________________________ MELISSA L. KYLE, Petitioner, v. HUBERT CARTER, JR., Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction. May 14, 2024 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. LEWIS, ROWE, and NORDBY, JJ

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-98-00308-CV Kyle Carter and Eric G. Carter, Appellants v.

09/12/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 4, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES CARTER MILLINDER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henderson County No. 22297-2 Donald H. Allen, Judge No. W2024-00059-CCA-R3-C

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01450-COA ASHTON JOHNSON APPELLANT v. THOMAS KYLE SMITH APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/23/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. J. LARRY BUFFINGTON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WAYNE COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR

LEE GABRIEL JUSTICE, dissenting and concurring. I agree with much of the majority opinion. I agree that appellant Jay Warne Carter Jr. cannot bring a derivative equitable-adjustment claim because the claim bé-longed to a dissolved corporation; therefore, the trial court did not err by granting partial summary judgment in favor of ap-pellee Erwin Lee Harvey Sr. I also agr

OPINION Opinion by Justice MOSELEY. Dustin Kyle Scott was convicted of assault on a public servant, a third degree felony, and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(b)(1) (West Supp.2018). His primary issue on appeal deals with the fact that a juror failed on voir dire to reveal that he knew Sharon Sco

DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge. |, Defendant appeals his conviction by an Orleans Parish jury of possession of cocaine. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the conviction and sentence. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND By bill of information dated June 27, 2006, defendant, Willie Carter, was charged with possession of cocaine, a violation of La.R.S. 40:967(C). Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence wa

MULLINS, Judge. Michael Carter appeals his convictions following guilty pleas to the charges of second-degree theft as a habitual offender and possession of marijuana, third offense. Carter claims the district court erred in accepting his stipulations to prior offenses for purposes of the habitual-offender and third-offense sentencing enhancements, contending the court failed to engage

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-KA-00622-COA JASON SKINNER A/K/A JASON KYLE APPELLANT SKINNER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/15/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TONI DEMETRESSE TERRETT COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WARREN COUNTY CIRCUIT

668 F.3d 1334 (2012) John Robert ADAIR, Diljeet Singh Athwal, and John Spencer Emtage, Appellants, v. Paul J. CARTER and Leonard G. Presta, Appellees. No. 2011-1212. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. February 7, 2012. *1335 Doreen Yatko Trujillo, Cozen O'Connor, P.C., of Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellants. Wit

[¡..CARTER, C.J. This is an appeal from a judgment issuing a writ of mandamus. FACTS Dr. Daniel G. Kyle, Louisiana State Legislative Auditor (Legislative Auditor), filed a petition for writ of mandamus against Patricia Johnson, Assessor of the First Municipal District, Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana, in the 19th Judicial District Court (19th JDC). Johnson was ordered to show

Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge *903This matter is before the Court on Defendant Element Transportation, LLC's ("Element Transportation") Motion to Dismiss, [R. 32], and Defendant Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.'s ("PTL") Motion to Dismiss, [R. 55]. Plaintiffs Gale Carter and Forbes Hayes (hereinafter "Plaintiffs") responded to both motions. [R. 59; R. 76.] Element Transport

Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge *886This matter is before the Court upon Defendants ECN Capital Corp. ("ECN-Cap") and ECN Financial, LLC's ("ECN-Fin") Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). [R. 149.] Plaintiffs Gale Carter and Forbes Hayes ("Plaintiffs") responded, [R. 159], and ECN-Cap and ECN-Fin (toge

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 535 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 536 Six-year-old Brittany Carter was burned when her five-year-old brother accidently set fire to her dress with a BIC lighte

ORDER Upon consideration of the cross-appellants’ unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of cross-appeal, 2011-1218, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 42(b), It Is ORdered That: The motion is granted. The revised caption in 2011-1212 is reflected above. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2011-1213.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WALTER HERBERT RICE, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. # 15), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 109 EAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

Debra H. Lehrmann, Justice The holder of the executive right to lease a mineral estate owes non-participating mineral- and royalty-interest owners a duty of utmost good faith and fair dealing. We recently examined the scope of this duty and concluded that, while its parameters "are imprecise, at bottom, the executive is prohibited from engaging in acts of self-dealing that unfairly diminish the value of the non-executive interest