Cases

[Cite as Kumar v. Sevastos, 2021-Ohio-1885.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ZACHARY G. KUMAR, ET AL., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 109795 v. : CONSTANTINE SEVASTOS, ET AL., :

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages incurred as the result of alleged acts of bad faith by defendant and third-party plaintiff, American Transit Insurance Company (American), as the insurer of plaintiffs’ assignor. American then commenced a third-party action alleging that the damages plaintiffs sought to recover from American were caused by the negligence of third-party defendants (collectively, Hiscock attorneys). We agree w

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MORGAN T. ZURN LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734

851 So.2d 214 (2003) John NEDEAU and Michael Gomez, Appellant, v. Tom GALLAGHER, in his official capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the State of Florida, and the State of Florida, Appellees. No. 1D02-1807. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 30, 2003. Rehearing Denied July 31, 2003. Cynthia S. Tunnicliff, Marc W. Dunbar and

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge. This is a government appeal, under 18 U.S.C. § 3731, from the district court’s actions in granting defendant’s motion to suppress and in denying the government’s motion for reconsideration. At issue in this prosecution for mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), using a false name in furtherance of mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1342), inducing interstate transport

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ajay Kumar Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of removal. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge. This case is again before the Court because the Plaintiff, Reaching Hearts International, Inc. (“RHI”), after more than eight years of trying, still has been unable to obtain a fairly routine water and sewer service category change for its property located in Prince George’s County that will permit it to build its new church structures. The late

788 N.E.2d 1153 (2003) 338 Ill. App.3d 522 273 Ill.Dec. 277 Wynona YOUNGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF CHICAGO, Paul Vallas, Chief Executive Officer, James A. Rapp, Hearing Officer, and Illinois State Board of Education, Defendants-Appellees. Louella Higgs, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Paul G. Vallas, Chief Execu

255 P.3d 110 (2011) 2011 MT 104 360 Mont. 317 UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner v. JUVENILE MALE, Respondent. No. OP 10-0280. Supreme Court of Montana. Argued January 19, 2011. Submitted January 20, 2011. Decided May 17, 2011. *111 For Petitioner

(2008) REACHING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. RWT 05-1688. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 4, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge. The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment envisions a land of religious diversity and tol

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Walter E. Campbell Company (“WECCO”) — a Maryland Corporation with its principal place of business in Maryland — brings this action against eight diverse corporations, and Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Corporation (“PCIGC”) — another Maryland Corporation with its princi

[Cite as Wolf v. Kaplan, 2021-Ohio-2447.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA MARY ELLEN WOLF, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 110104 v. : GREGORY KAPLAN, :

Van Ostrand v Latham (2023 NY Slip Op 06629) Van Ostrand v Latham 2023 NY Slip Op 06629 Decided on December 22, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

I. N. v City of Yonkers (2022 NY Slip Op 01301) I. N. v City of Yonkers 2022 NY Slip Op 01301 Decided on March 2, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

SUMMARY ORDER The appellants appeal from the district court’s denial of their motions for relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Computer Associates International, Inc. (“Computer Associates”) cross-appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion to clarify or amend its August 2, 2007, 2007 WL 2261683, order. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the eases, and the

SUMMARY ORDER The appellants appeal from the district court’s denial of their motions for relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Computer Associates International, Inc. (“Computer Associates”) cross-appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion to clarify or amend its August 2, 2007, 2007 WL 2261683, order. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the eases, and the

MEMORANDUM OPINION WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge. I. Background Plaintiff Graphic Styles/Styles International LLC (“Graphic Styles”) filed this action seeking damages and injunctive relief for Defendants’ alleged infringement of its copyrights. Defendants allegedly are residents of Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China. In the present Motion, Graphic Styles seek

395 A.2d 36 (1978) Arrelious GREGG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 12406. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted June 8, 1978. Decided November 13, 1978. *37 Donald F. Rosendorf, Washington, D. C., appointed by the court, was on the brief for appellant. Earl J. Silbert, U. S. Atty., a

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1351 INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its members; MUHAMMED METEAB; PAUL HARRIS

OPINION PER CURIAM: For the third time, we are called upon to assess the legality of the President’s efforts to bar over 150 million nationals of six designated countries 1 from entering the United States or being issued immigrant visas that they w