Cases

OPINION FARRIS, Circuit Judge. The Kroger Company appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Regional Airport Authority of Louisville and Jefferson County’s decision to partially reimburse Kroger for relocation expenses under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970CURA), 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 4621-4638 (West 1995

710 F.Supp.2d 637 (2010) KINDHEARTS FOR CHARITABLE HUMANITARIAN DEVELOMENT, INC., Plaintiff v. Timothy GEITHNER, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:08CV2400. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. May 10, 2010. *642 Fritz Byers, Toledo, OH, Alan R. Kabat, Bernabei & Wachtel, David D. Cole, Georgetown Universit

678 F.Supp.2d 498 (2010) EXECUTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LLC, et al., Plaintiffs v. LOUISVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-143-S. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. January 4, 2010. *503 Walter Bedford, Jr., Louisville, KY, for Plaintiffs. Bethany A. Bre

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Coalition for the Advancement of Regional Transportation alleges that defendants failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq., and violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(d), when they approved the Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project, a $2.6 billion construction and transportation management pro

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This matter is pending for consideration of Defendants Diversified Clinical Services, Ine.’s (“DCS”), and Austin Day’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Sanctions. [Record Nos. 36, 43] The defendants contend that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [Record No. 36] Addi

OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge. This consolidated case is a pre-enforcement challenge to a Recall Remedy Order issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, as amended and recodi-fied at 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301, §§ 30101-30183 (“Safety Act”). This matter is before the Court on the Moti

ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P

359 F.Supp.2d 579 (2004) Lydia WISEMAN, Plaintiff v. WHAYNE SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:01CV-135-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, At Louisville. January 12, 2004. *580 *581 *582 *583 Mich

COOPER, Justice, dissenting in part. I dissent from the majority opinion because (1) the insurance policies issued by American Nuclear Insurers (ANI) are third-party liability policies that do not provide coverage either for property damage to the insured site or for capital improvements to the site itself (referred to as “site measures”); (2) the trial court properly instructed the jury on the issue of fortu

Affirmed and Opinion filed October 25, 2011. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ___________________ NO. 14-10-00349-CV ___________________ CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS AND HARRIS COUNTY-HOUSTON SPORTS AUTHORITY, Appellants V. HOTELS.COM, L.P., HOTWIRE, INC., EXPE

951 F.Supp. 1383 (1996) NORTH CENTRAL F.S., INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. Alan L. BROWN, David Burmester, Don Butson, Steve Hackbarth, Ken Mutschler, Marlyn Tripp, Kurt Wolf, and Maurice Wolf, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs. CEBAR FARMS, INC., Barbara Lyon, Jerry Lyon, and James Dean Krabbe, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, v. NORTH CENTRAL F.S., INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. Nos. C

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

844 S.W.2d 198 (1992) DIAMOND SHAMROCK REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Roque MENDEZ, Respondent. No. D-1090. Supreme Court of Texas. October 7, 1992. Rehearing Overruled December 31, 1992. Concurring and Dissenting Opinions on Motion for Rehearing December 31, 1992. W. Wendell Hall, San Antonio, for petitioner.

803 F.Supp. 994 (1992) TM MARKETING, INC., Plaintiff, v. ART & ANTIQUES ASSOCIATES, L.P., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 92-1889 (AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 14, 1992. Lynn F. Miller, Miller & Littman, P.A., New Brunswick, N.J., for plaintiff. *995 Steven R. Klein, Cole, Schotz, Bernstein,

McGRAW, Chief Justice. The appellant in this case, Sue S. Crump, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Raleigh County granting summary judgment for the defendant/appellee, Beckley Newspapers, Inc. She asserts that the tri*704al court erred in granting summary judgment because issues of material fact existed which should have been submitted for jury considerati

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TROUTMAN, District Judge. A manufacturer and distributor of heavy duty trucks, defendant Mack Trucks, Inc. (Mack) conducts business throughout the United States and in over seventy-five countries around the world. Mack maintains four American manufacturing and assembly plants, located in Hayward, California, Hagerstown, Maryland, Macungie and Allentown, Pennsylvania, where plaintiff obt

MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW OF PHASE I, PHASE II AND PHASE III AND ORDERS TO CLERK VOLUME I OF TWO VOLUMES, containing: Complete Table of Contents for both volumes Pages 385 to 462, inclusive. TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I PHASE I PAGE Introduction 385 PHASE I FINDINGS OF FA

863 F.2d 891 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2691, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2250,274 U.S.App.D.C. 202, 57 USLW 2304,110 Lab.Cas. P 10,762, 110 Lab.Cas. P 10,824,110 Lab.Cas. P 10,941 AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONALv.EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., Appellant.TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al.v.EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., AppellantINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPAC

67 F.Supp. 626 (1946) UNITED STATES v. NEW YORK GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO., Inc., et al. Criminal No. 16153. District Court, E. D. Illinois. September 21, 1946. *627 *628 *629 Holmes Baldridge, Horace L. Flurry, Earl A. Jinkinson, Richard B. O'Don

OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. In May 2012, Paul F. Mik, Jr., Lee Ann Mik, and PALS Enterprises, LLC (collectively, “the Miks”) filed suit against the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), arguing that they were unlawfully evicted from their rental home after their landlord defaulted on her mortgage and the property was sold a