Cases

689 N.E.2d 1238 (1997) Ralph D. SMITH, Appellant (Defendant), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 85S04-9701-CR-27. Supreme Court of Indiana. December 29, 1997. *1239 Kristina L. Lynn, Tiede Metz & Downs, P.C., Wabash, for Appellant. Pamela Carter, Attorney General, James D. Dimitri, Deputy Attorney General,

FRIEDLANDER, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Smith received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The critical issue in the instant case is the admissibility of the statement given to the police by Smith. In the statement, Smith admitted that he had molested S.S. and gave a detailed account of his actions in committing several molestations. Smith

KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellee Carlos Reyna brought an action on his own behalf and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals against his former employer, Defendant-Appellant International Bank of Commerce, contending that IBC violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay proper overtime rates. IBC moved to compel arbitration of Reyna’s claim, but the di

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: Following a six-day trial, a jury found that EmCare, Inc. (“EmCare”) terminated three employees in retaliation for complaining of sexual harassment in the workplace. The district court denied EmCare’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. EmCare' appeals the judgment with respect to one employee, Luke Trahan. Specifically, EmCare contends that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EE

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: In September 2011, Jacked Up, L.L.C. (“Jacked Up”) and Sara Lee Corporation (“Sara Lee”) signed a licensing agreement whereby Sara Lee would produce and sell energy drinks developed by Jacked Up. Shortly thereafter, Sara Lee'sold its beverage division to the J.M. Smucker Company (“Smucker”). Smucker decided not to assume Sara Lee’s licensing agreem

389 B.R. 481 (2008) In re MIRANT CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 03-46590-DML-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. May 15, 2008. *483 Alison Kirshner, Bryan A. Merryman, Charles C. Kline, Claudine Columbres, Daniel Ginsberg, Erika Ruiz, Erin L. Connolly, Felix J. Lopez, Forrest W. Hunter, Frank L. Eaton,

JOHN A. ROSS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Express Scripts' Motions to Exclude Expert *797Report and Testimony of Plaintiff's experts Loyd Allen (Doc. No. 466), Kenneth Schafermeyer (Doc. No. 469), and Richard Moon (Doc. No. 474), and Express Scripts' Motion for Reconsideration and For Sanctions Concerning the

JOHN A. ROSS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs HM Compounding Services, LLC and HMX Services, LLC (collectively "HM")'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 472) and Defendant Express Script ("ESI")'s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 478). The motions are fully briefed and ready for disposition.1 Oral argument was held on October 12, 2018.</

VINSON, District Judge, dissenting: Although every case is important to the litigants involved, not every case is independently significant. But this one is, and it has the potential to create bad law in two important areas. The majority first holds — and it is the only court ever to do so — that Section 4(a)(2) of the ADEA authorizes disparate impact claims brought by job applicants. It gets there by findin

354 B.R. 113 (2006) In re MIRANT CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 03-46590 DML-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. November 21, 2006. *114 *115 *116 *117 *118

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, No. 11-17884 A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL; NATIONAL D.C. No. ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE 2:09-cv-00058- CALIFORNIA, Yes on 8, Sponsored MCE-DAD by National Organization for Marriage; NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA PAC; OPINION JOHN DOE #1, an individual, Pla

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-1834 ___________________________ Midwest Foster Care and Adoption Association; Missouri State Foster Care and Adoption Board; Wesley Cauveren; Jennifer Cauveren; Kristina DesCombes; Tyran Murrell; Michael Paulsen; Kay Paulsen

714 F.Supp.2d 475 (2010) PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO. INC. et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 10841(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 1, 2010. *478 David R. Stickney, David A. Thorpe, Timothy Alan Delange, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Gross

OSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION2019 OK 40Case Number: SCBD-6799Decided: 06/10/2019IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2019 OK 40, __ P.3d __ FOR PUBLICATION IN O

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 06 2019, 9:00 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collater

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. This securities action is a consolidation of four eases involving claims for violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77i(a)(2), 77o, in connection with defendants’ sale of mortgage pass-through certificates by means of documents that allegedly contained untrue statements and material

B. Lynn Winmill, Chief U.S. District Judge INTRODUCTION The Court has before it Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 23) and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 24). The Court heard oral argument on July 19, 2018, and now issues the following decision. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiffs Charlene Quade and

348 B.R. 725 (2006) In re MIRANT CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 03-46590-DML-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. August 9, 2006. *726 *727 Craig H. Averch, Michelle C. Campbell, Paul E. Godinez, Ronald Kevin Gorsich, Kerri A. Lyman, White & Case, L.L.P., Los Ang

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2023-1401 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF GENERAL PRACTICE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION. March 20, 2025 PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar’s Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration Committee proposes the addition of new rules 2.345 (Electronic Signature of Court Official) and 2.511 (Florid

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2023-1401 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF GENERAL PRACTICE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION. March 20, 2025 CORRECTED OPINION PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar’s Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration Committee proposes the addition of new rules 2.345 (Electronic Signatur