⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kristina L. Ward”

Ward v. Peckpublic domain
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2010-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 27 Mass. L. Rptr. 12
Hinkle, Margaret R., J. This case arises out of a divorce settlement agreement entered into between the plaintiff Kristina Ward and her former husband. In connection with the administration of the settlement agreement, the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendants, Jay Goldfarb (“Goldfarb”), Kathleen Trachy (“Trachy”), and Fortis Management Group, LLC (“Fortis”) (collectively “defendants”), alleging claims for negligent a
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2022-08-15 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5367-18 BRIAN and KRISTINA PUGLIA, Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Respondents, v. ROSEMARIA PHILLIPS and ARTHUR PHILLIPS, Defendants-Respondents/ Cross-Appellants, and ESTATE OF ANGELINA PUGLIA, Defendan
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-1899 _____________________________ KRISTINA LEIGHTNER WOOLF, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY M. WOOLF, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction. October 31, 2018 PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of prohibiti
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2023-12-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. December 27, 2023 A party may file with the Supreme Court a
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-09-28 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-267 _____________________________ KRISTINA LEIGHTNER WOOLF, Appellant, v. ANTHONY M. WOOLF, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County. Jeffrey E. Lewis, Judge. September 28, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. MAKAR, OSTE
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2026-07-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 WI 27
2026 WI 27 WISCONSIN VOTER ALLIANCE, et al., Petitioners-Appellants-Petitioners, v. KRISTINA SECORD, Respondent-Respondent. No. 2023AP36 Decided July 7, 2026 REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals Walworth County Circuit Court (David
J.L.T. v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998-07-09 · Published · cited 0× · 717 So. 2d 68
JOANOS, Judge. Appellant pled guilty in a juvenile proceeding. A disposition hearing was scheduled and the court ordered the Department of Juvenile Justice to prepare a predisposition report. In its report, the Department recommended that appellant be placed on community control. This court has previously ruled that community control is not a commitment restrictiveness level. See, e.g., L.R.J. v. State, 706 So.2d 72
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01782-COA CRYSTAL LAFAYETTE ROBERTS APPELLANT v. EZRA CONNER, KRISTINA FARRA AND APPELLEES LUCILLE LAFAYETTE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/12/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT Q. WHITWELL COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: CALHOUN COUNTY
Woolf v. Woolfpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 255 So. 3d 996
Per Curiam. The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. Ray, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025-02-28 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 DNH 026
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kristina Pastoriza and Ruth Ward v. Case No. 24-cv-252-PB-TSM Opinion No. 2025 DNH 026 Public Service Company of New Hampshire, et al. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Public Service Company of New Hampshire, doing business as Eversource Energy (Eversource), is proposing to re
State v. Wardpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008-01-18 · Published · cited 0× · 973 So. 2d 597; 2008 WL 161195
973 So.2d 597 (2008) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Kristina WARD, Appellee. No. 2D07-1501. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 18, 2008. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Publ
District Court, D. Kansas · 2007-03-30 · Published · cited 8× · 241 F.R.D. 668; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24823; 2007 WL 960049
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER O’HARA, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction This is a “tobacco” case, but not of the personal injury variety. Highly summarized, the legal claims in this case are that the defendants, Philip Morris USA, Inc. (“Philip Morris”), and its corporate parent, Altria Group, Inc. (“Altria”), violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (“KCPA”), K.S.A.
California Court of Appeal, 2nd District · 2016-03-02 · Published · cited 0× · 199 Cal. Rptr. 3d 849; 245 Cal. App. 4th 406; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 168
LAVIN, J. *414INTRODUCTION Petitioner Bianka M.1 is a 13-year old girl from Honduras who entered the United States without documentation in 2013. After a brief detention by federal immigration authorities, Bianka resettled in Los Angeles where she now lives with her mother. Bianka'
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017-05-09 · Published · cited 25× · 856 F.3d 106; 45 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1714; 2017 WL 1842511; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8176
KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge: The First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Costly and time-consuming defamation litigation can threaten those essential freedoms. To preserve First Amendment freedoms and give reporters, commentators, bloggers, and tweeters (among others) the breathing room they need to pursue the truth, the Supreme Court has directed cou
Supreme Court of the United States · 2007-04-17 · Published · cited 108× · 167 L. Ed. 2d 422; 127 S. Ct. 1513; 550 U.S. 45; 2007 U.S. LEXIS 4334; 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 152; 41 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1; 75 U.S.L.W. 4188
127 S.Ct. 1513 (2007) GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Petitioner, v. METROPHONES TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. No. 05-705. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 10, 2006. Decided April 17, 2007. *1515 Jeffrey L. Fisher, Seattle, WA, for the petitioner. Roy T. Englert, Jr., Washington, D.C., f
Washington Supreme Court · 2017-01-26 · Published · cited 43× · 187 Wash. 2d 592
Wiggins, J. ¶1 In 2013, the legislature amended the statute governing termination of parental rights. The legislature provided that “[i]f the parent is incarcerated, the court shall consider” a set of factors before determining that “continuation of the parent and child relationship clearly diminishes the child’s prospects for early integration into a stable and permanent home.” RCW 13.34.180(l)(f) (emphasis added). Pet
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015-04-28 · Published · cited 27× · 187 Wash. App. 399
Korsmo, J. ¶1 A prisoner challenges the termination of her parental relationship with her two youngest children, arguing that the trial court did not properly consider the latest amendments to Washington’s statutory policy regarding incarcerated parents. Because of conflicting evidence, the trial court’s failure to explain its reasoning leaves us uncertain how the court applied the statute. We remand for the trial court to conduc
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2019-06-05 · Published · cited 7× · 828 S.E.2d 800; 242 W. Va. 1
HUTCHISON, Justice: Plaintiffs Margot Beth Crowder and David Wentz own the surface of land in Doddridge County, West Virginia. Defendant EQT Production Company ("EQT") holds a century-old lease that allows EQT to drill wells to extract oil and gas from beneath the plaintiffs' surface estate. The plaintiffs brought this lawsuit to challenge EQT's use of their surface estate to drill ho
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. NORTH BEACH 1003,LLC,STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. SHANIN SPECTER, ETALSTATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. THOMAS R. KLINESTATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. ROBERT S. HEKEMIAN,ET AL. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. RICHARD CAROLAN, ETAL.STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. JEANETTE F.FRANKENBERGSTATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. BEVERLY T. CAMMARANO QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE TRUSTSTATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. BARBARA J. WELDONSTATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. COLLEEN M. ROWE, ETAL.STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. KEVIN KLINGERT, ETAL. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. PATRICIA ROBERTSTRUST STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. DAVID CASTELBLANCO,ET AL. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. RICHARD MALOUF, ETAL. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. FREDERICK SMITH, ETAL.STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. MICHAEL VANKRALINGENSTATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. DENNIS LA PLANTE, ETAL. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. COURTNEY M. ALESSO,ET AL. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. MINALKUMAR A. PATELLIVING TRUST STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. NEIL KAHANOVITZ, ETAL.STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. JILL P. GILESREVOCABLE TRUSTNINA RITTER VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPSTATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. RAYMOND BRAUN, ETAL.STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. THOMAS BUCKLEY, ETAL. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEP VS. GERARD LOSURDO, ETAL. (L-3067-15,L-3071-15, L-3077-15, L-3066-15,L-3069-15,L-2919-15, L-3289-15, L-3286-15, L-3420-15,L-3410-15, L-3319-15, L-3287-15, L-3285-15, L-3438-15,L-0442-16, L-0444-16, L-0443-16, L-3206-15, L-3205-15,L-3288-15,L-2949-15, L-3204-15, L-3292-15, L-3275-15, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED)public domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017-06-22 · Published · cited 0× · 451 N.J. Super. 214; 166 A.3d 239
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3393-15T4, A-3396-15T4, A-3397-15T4, A-3398-15T4, A-3399-15T4, A-3727-15T4, A-3770-15T4,
S.J.J. v. Gnatpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998-02-27 · Published · cited 0× · 707 So. 2d 393; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1863; 1998 WL 81564
PER CURIAM. S.J.J., a juvenile, is charged with possession of marijuana within 1,000 feet of a school with intent to sell. This is a second-degree felony pursuant to section 893.13(l)(c)2, Florida Statutes (1997). He was initially placed in secure detention but later placed in home detention with electronic monitoring. He petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that he does not qualify for any form of detenti