⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kristin L. Ammon”

United States Court of Federal Claims · 2014-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 116 Fed. Cl. 708; 2014 U.S. Claims LEXIS 597; 2014 WL 2958822
OPINION HORN, J. PROCEDURAL HISTORY This ease addresses the amended complaint filed by plaintiff, Kingman Reef Atoll Development, L.L.C. (KRAD) in 2012. Originally, Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. (KRAI) and KRAD brought a takings claim before this court alleging that KRAI hel
Indiana Supreme Court · 2016-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 50 N.E.3d 143; 2016 Ind. LEXIS 240; 2016 WL 1329583
On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 45A03-1411-CR-394 PER CURIAM. Kevin Ammons committed child molesting in Indiana in 1988 and was convicted in 1989, before passage of any part of Indiana’s Sex Offender Registry Act (the “Act” or “SORA”). Ammons was released in 2006 and completed parole in 2007. Ammons registered as a sex offende
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015-06-17 · Published · cited 0× · 36 N.E.3d 1079; 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 468; 2015 WL 3767629
Jun 17 2015, 7:58 am ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Kristin A. Mulholland Gregory F. Zoeller LeBlanc & Mulholland, LLC Attorney General of Indiana Crown Point, Indiana Kenneth E. Biggins
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013-12-19 · Published · cited 37× · 741 F.3d 390
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1369 UNITED STATES ex rel. KURT BUNK; UNITED STATES ex rel. RAY AMMONS, Plaintiffs – Appellants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor/Plaintiff – Intervenor, and UNITED STATES ex rel. DANIEL HEUSER, Plaintiff, v. GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE M
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014-09-24 · Published · cited 1× · 51 F. Supp. 3d 799; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134319; 2014 WL 4754816
*802 ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 38], filed on February 21, 2014 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a); Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Surreply [Docket No. 91], filed on July 21, 2014; and Defendants’ Motio
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2003-08-06 · Published · cited 1× · 57 Fed. Cl. 571; 2003 U.S. Claims LEXIS 234; 2003 WL 22049531
OPINION AND ORDER HEWITT, Judge. This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject *572matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs seek compensation for defendant’s physical taking and imposition of a servitude upon plaintiffs’ property through the publication of an ae
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2005-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 67 Fed. Cl. 504; 61 ERC (BNA) 1385; 2005 U.S. Claims LEXIS 256; 2005 WL 2100579
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. What is property? The derivation of the word is simple enough, arising from the Latin proprietas or “ownership,” in turn stemming from proprius, meaning “own” or “proper.” But, this etymology reveals little. Philosophers such as Aristotle, Cicero, Seneca, Grotius, Pufendorf and Locke each, in turn, have debated the meaning of this term, as later did legal luminaries
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-11-28 · Published · cited 0× · 222 F. Supp. 3d 716; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164066; 2016 WL 6962836
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN W. DARRAH, United States District Court Judge Plaintiff, Jennifer DiPema, filed a Second Amended Complaint against Defendant, the Chicago School of Professional *718Psychology, alleging breach of contract and negligence. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [93] on all counts. For the reasons set forth mor
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 762 F. Supp. 2d 1107; 24 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 174; 190 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2043; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2245; 2011 WL 66019
762 F.Supp.2d 1107 (2011) Slimmarie PERRYWATSON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 10 C 0639. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 10, 2011. *1109 Michael Drain, J. Michael Drain, Jr., Michael Drain Attorney at Law, Euclid, OH, Aaron Benjamin Maduff, Christina D. Hatzid
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 129 Fed. Cl. 722; 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1933; 2016 WL 7385039
Water Rights; Physical vs. Regulatory Takings; Endangered Species Act; Motions in Limine. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions in limine regarding the proper legal framework for analyzing plaintiffs’ takings claims in the above-captioned cases. Plaintiffs in the abo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020-12-08 · Published · cited 69× · 982 F.3d 113
19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY
Dressler v. Statepublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 1991-10-24 · Published · cited 31× · 819 P.2d 1288; 107 Nev. 686; 1991 Nev. LEXIS 164
819 P.2d 1288 (1991) Robert James DRESSLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 21088. Supreme Court of Nevada. October 24, 1991. *1289 Terri Steik Roeser, State Public Defender, and Janet S. Bessemer, Deputy Public Defender, Carson City, for appellant. Frankie Sue Del Papa, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Scott Do
Idaho Supreme Court · 2026-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 52313 EDWARD STASIEWICZ and BARBARA ) STASIEWICZ, husband and wife, ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) and ) ) THE SOUTH HENRY’S LAKE OUTLET ) HOMEOW
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2020-02-18 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-9002 Filed: February 18, 2020 ) IN RE DOWNSTREAM ADDICKS ) Fifth Amendment Taking; Motion to AND BARKER (TEXAS) ) Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); Motion for FLOOD-
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2001-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 48 Fed. Cl. 520; 2001 U.S. Claims LEXIS 4; 2001 WL 29233
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. This case is the modern legacy of a series of events that began in 1866, when the United States, flush with a desire for expansion, made large land grants to the railroads to promote rail construction in its developing Southwest territories. Some of these lands eventually wended their way to the Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company (plaintiff or “Santa Fe”). In this ease, Santa Fe claims
Rhode v. Hallpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009-09-17 · Published · cited 88× · 582 F.3d 1273; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20712; 2009 WL 2960933
582 F.3d 1273 (2009) Brandon RHODE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hilton HALL, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic Prison, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-16960. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 17, 2009. *1277 Thomas H. Dunn and Brian S. Kammer (Court-Appointed), GA Resource Ctr., Atlanta, GA, for Rhode. Patricia
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-09-03 · Published · cited 253× · 296 F.3d 1339; 2002 WL 1586329
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Boise Cascade (“Boise”) appeals the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims dismissing its complaint for failure to state a claim. Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States, No. 99-860 L (Ct. Fed. Cl. April 10, 2001). We affirm. I This case involves a 65-acre tract of old-growth forest
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2025-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 N.H. 29
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by email at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015-11-24 · Published · cited 6× · 147 F. Supp. 3d 537; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158698; 2015 WL 7459697
ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT. JUDGE In this litigation, Plaintiff' Andretti Sports Marketing Louisiana, LLC (“Andretti”) alleges that it is owed money under a contract it entered into with Defendant NOLA Motorsports Host Committee, Inc. (“NMHC”).1 Andretti alleges that Defendants NOLA Motor Club, LLC (“NOLA Motor”) and Laney Chouest (“Chouest”) are also
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-01-08 · Published · cited 0×
Filed: January 8, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1369 (1:02-cv-01168-AJT-TRJ) UNITED STATES ex rel. KURT BUNK; UNITED STATES ex rel. RAY AMMONS, Plaintiffs – Appellants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor/Plaintiff – Intervenor, and UNITED STATES ex rel. DANIE