Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kristin L. Ammon”
OPINION HORN, J. PROCEDURAL HISTORY This ease addresses the amended complaint filed by plaintiff, Kingman Reef Atoll Development, L.L.C. (KRAD) in 2012. Originally, Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. (KRAI) and KRAD brought a takings claim before this court alleging that KRAI hel
Kevin Allyn Ammons v. State of Indianapublic domain
On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 45A03-1411-CR-394 PER CURIAM. Kevin Ammons committed child molesting in Indiana in 1988 and was convicted in 1989, before passage of any part of Indiana’s Sex Offender Registry Act (the “Act” or “SORA”). Ammons was released in 2006 and completed parole in 2007. Ammons registered as a sex offende
Kevin A. Ammons v. State of Indianapublic domain
Jun 17 2015, 7:58 am ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Kristin A. Mulholland Gregory F. Zoeller LeBlanc & Mulholland, LLC Attorney General of Indiana Crown Point, Indiana Kenneth E. Biggins
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1369 UNITED STATES ex rel. KURT BUNK; UNITED STATES ex rel. RAY AMMONS, Plaintiffs – Appellants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor/Plaintiff – Intervenor, and UNITED STATES ex rel. DANIEL HEUSER, Plaintiff, v. GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE M
Rednour v. Wayne Townshippublic domain
*802 ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 38], filed on February 21, 2014 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a); Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Surreply [Docket No. 91], filed on July 21, 2014; and Defendants’ Motio
Breneman v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER HEWITT, Judge. This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject *572matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs seek compensation for defendant’s physical taking and imposition of a servitude upon plaintiffs’ property through the publication of an ae
Klamath Irrigation District v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. What is property? The derivation of the word is simple enough, arising from the Latin proprietas or “ownership,” in turn stemming from proprius, meaning “own” or “proper.” But, this etymology reveals little. Philosophers such as Aristotle, Cicero, Seneca, Grotius, Pufendorf and Locke each, in turn, have debated the meaning of this term, as later did legal luminaries
DiPerna v. Chicago School of Professional Psychologypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN W. DARRAH, United States District Court Judge Plaintiff, Jennifer DiPema, filed a Second Amended Complaint against Defendant, the Chicago School of Professional *718Psychology, alleging breach of contract and negligence. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [93] on all counts. For the reasons set forth mor
Perrywatson v. United Airlines, Inc.public domain
762 F.Supp.2d 1107 (2011) Slimmarie PERRYWATSON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 10 C 0639. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 10, 2011. *1109 Michael Drain, J. Michael Drain, Jr., Michael Drain Attorney at Law, Euclid, OH, Aaron Benjamin Maduff, Christina D. Hatzid
Klamath Irrigation v. United Statespublic domain
Water Rights; Physical vs. Regulatory Takings; Endangered Species Act; Motions in Limine. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions in limine regarding the proper legal framework for analyzing plaintiffs’ takings claims in the above-captioned cases. Plaintiffs in the abo
19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY
Dressler v. Statepublic domain
819 P.2d 1288 (1991) Robert James DRESSLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 21088. Supreme Court of Nevada. October 24, 1991. *1289 Terri Steik Roeser, State Public Defender, and Janet S. Bessemer, Deputy Public Defender, Carson City, for appellant. Frankie Sue Del Papa, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Scott Do
Stasiewicz v. South Henry's Lakepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 52313 EDWARD STASIEWICZ and BARBARA ) STASIEWICZ, husband and wife, ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) and ) ) THE SOUTH HENRY’S LAKE OUTLET ) HOMEOW
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-9002 Filed: February 18, 2020 ) IN RE DOWNSTREAM ADDICKS ) Fifth Amendment Taking; Motion to AND BARKER (TEXAS) ) Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); Motion for FLOOD-
Santa Fe Pacific Railroad v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. This case is the modern legacy of a series of events that began in 1866, when the United States, flush with a desire for expansion, made large land grants to the railroads to promote rail construction in its developing Southwest territories. Some of these lands eventually wended their way to the Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company (plaintiff or “Santa Fe”). In this ease, Santa Fe claims
Rhode v. Hallpublic domain
582 F.3d 1273 (2009) Brandon RHODE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hilton HALL, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic Prison, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-16960. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 17, 2009. *1277 Thomas H. Dunn and Brian S. Kammer (Court-Appointed), GA Resource Ctr., Atlanta, GA, for Rhode. Patricia
Boise Cascade Corporation v. United Statespublic domain
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Boise Cascade (“Boise”) appeals the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims dismissing its complaint for failure to state a claim. Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States, No. 99-860 L (Ct. Fed. Cl. April 10, 2001). We affirm. I This case involves a 65-acre tract of old-growth forest
Contoocook Valley Sch. Dist. v. Statepublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by email at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet
ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT. JUDGE In this litigation, Plaintiff' Andretti Sports Marketing Louisiana, LLC (“Andretti”) alleges that it is owed money under a contract it entered into with Defendant NOLA Motorsports Host Committee, Inc. (“NMHC”).1 Andretti alleges that Defendants NOLA Motor Club, LLC (“NOLA Motor”) and Laney Chouest (“Chouest”) are also
Filed: January 8, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1369 (1:02-cv-01168-AJT-TRJ) UNITED STATES ex rel. KURT BUNK; UNITED STATES ex rel. RAY AMMONS, Plaintiffs – Appellants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor/Plaintiff – Intervenor, and UNITED STATES ex rel. DANIE