Cases

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, members of the Twentieth Century Holiness Tabernacle Church (“the Church”) who allegedly have been arrested or threatened with legal injury pursuant to any of four specific municipal ordinances 2 (collectively referred to as “the ordinances”), appeal from final

408 F.Supp.2d 854 (2005) 2005 DSD 25 KRANTZ, INC., a South Dakota Corporation, d/b/a Krantz Buick Olds Nissan, Inc., and Billion Southtown, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant. Krantz, Inc., a South Dakota corporation, d/b/a Krantz Buick Olds Nissan, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Nissan North America, Inc., a California Corporation, Defendant.</

98 F.Supp.2d 150 (2000) Richard T. KRANTZ, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, COMPANY, Fidelity Distributors Corporation, and FMR Corp., Defendants. No. CivA 98-11988-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 31, 2000. *151 Susan E. Stenger, Perkins, Smith & Cohen, Boston, MA, Jeffrey M. Haber, J

RILEY, Circuit Judge. After being terminated from her employment with Adventure Lands of Amer-ica, Inc. (Adventure Lands), Judy A. Libel (Libel) filed a lawsuit against Adventure Lands claiming violations under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, the Iowa Civil *1031

PER CURIAM. Reversed on the authority of State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1981) and remanded for further proceedings. REVERSED AND REMANDED. ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. This case arose out of a constitutional challenge to certain ordinances enacted by the defendant municipalities. This is the second time this case has been before our court. In the first appeal, we determined that the challenged ordinances were unconstitutionally overbroad. See Krantz v. City of Fort Smith, 160 F.3d 1214, 1222 (8th Cir.

669 P.2d 1049 (1983) In the Matter of the Claim of Allen W. KRANTZ, Kevin E. Hawkins, Mark W. Williams, Kenneth J. Skalla and Albert E. Britton, Jr., Petitioners, v. KELRAN CONSTRUCTORS, INC., The Industrial Commission of the State of Colorado (Ex-Officio Unemployment Compensation Commission of Colorado), and Director, Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Employment and Training, Respondents. No. 83CA0115.

[Cite as Calvary S.P.V. I., L.L.C. v. Krantz, 2012-Ohio-2202.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97422 CAVALRY SPV I, LLC PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED JUNE 1998 SESSION September 10, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) NO. 01C01-9707-CR-00284 Appellee,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE RICKY H. KRANTZ v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County No. 94-A-21 Robert Holloway, Judge No. M2003-02819-CCA-R3-HC - Filed November 12, 2004 The Petitioner, Ricky H. Krantz, appeals from the dismissal of his petition for the writ of habeas corpus. The State has filed a motion

174 Ariz. 211 (1992) 848 P.2d 296 The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. David Dean KRANTZ, Appellant. No. 2 CA-CR 92-0192. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. May 28, 1992. Review Denied April 13, 1993. *212 Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie and Jack Roberts, Phoe

172 N.W.2d 624 (1969) 184 Neb. 838 Stephen F. KRANTZ, Appellant, v. MARGE'S MUFFLERS, INC., Appellee. No. 37214. Supreme Court of Nebraska. December 5, 1969. *625 Young, Holm, McEachen & Hamann, Omaha, for appellant. Gross, Welch, Vinardi, Kauffman, Schatz & Day, Omaha, for appellee.

Per Curiam. Appellants assert that the court of appeals erred in granting the writ of prohibition. In order to be entitled to a writ of prohibition, appellee had to establish that Judge Smith was about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial authority, that the exercise of that power was unauthorized by law, and that denying the writ would have resulted in injury for which no other adequate remedy existed in the ordinar

681 N.E.2d 1100 (1997) 289 Ill. App.3d 447 224 Ill.Dec. 479 Edward KRANTZ, Appellant, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al. (Sahara Coal Company, Inc., Appellee). NO. 5-96-0228WC. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District, Industrial Commission Division. June 30, 1997. *1101 James C

160 F.3d 1214 Albert KRANTZ, Ron Decker, Donald Sweat, on behalf ofthemselves and others similarly situated, Appellants,v.CITY OF FORT SMITH, Arkansas; City of Van Buren, Arkansas;City of Alma, Arkansas; City of Dyer, Arkansas,Appellees.Albert KRANTZ; Ron Decker; Donald Sweat; on behalf ofthemselves and others similarly situated, Appellants,v.CITY OF ALMA, Arkansas; City of Dyer, Arkansas, Appellees.

NO. 5-96-0228WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION DIVISION _________________________________________________________________ EDWARD KRANTZ, ) Appeal from the

This case originated in the Common Pleas Court of Tuscarawas County as an action for statutory partition. It involves the construction of Section 10503-5, General Code, the so-called half-and-half statute, and what the phrase therein, "identical real estate," means. The trial court held that the phrase, "identical real estate," comprised the property in question, granted the prayer of the petition; and, consequently, held that the property was the identical real estate devised to the intestat

{¶ 1} This second appeal1 concerns the status of a case when an arbitration award has been challenged on gross-procedural-error grounds in an appellate court, and the appellate court has ruled that the trial court should have vacated the award. We note that to this date, the trial court in this matter has not vacated the award. Instead, the trial court has held that the matter is moot, which is the basis of this second appeal.</