Cases

Kramer-Wilson Co., Inc. v National Gen. Mgt. Corp. (2023 NY Slip Op 00953) Kramer-Wilson Co., Inc. v National Gen. Mgt. Corp. 2023 NY Slip Op 00953 Decided on February 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York Stat

Kramer-Wilson Co., Inc. v National Gen. Mgt. Corp. (2023 NY Slip Op 00953) Kramer-Wilson Co., Inc. v National Gen. Mgt. Corp. 2023 NY Slip Op 00953 Decided on February 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York Stat

GERBER, J. The insureds appeal the circuit court’s final summary judgment in favor of the insurer. The insureds primarily argue that their untimely pre-suit notice of the alleged loss and untimely pre-suit submission of a sworn proof of loss did not preclude them from recovery under the policy. We disagree. We conclude that the in*304sureds’ untimely pre-suit notice o

41 So.3d 313 (2010) STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. William KRAMER and Sheila Kramer, Respondents. No. 4D10-1076. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 14, 2010. Anthony J. Russo and Curt Allen of Butler Pappas Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, Tampa, and Kara Berard Rockenbach and Sara Klco of Methe & Rockenbach, P.A., West Pa

Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Cohen & Kramer M.D., P.C. (2020 NY Slip Op 06474) Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Cohen & Kramer M.D., P.C. 2020 NY Slip Op 06474 Decided on November 12, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department

Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Cohen & Kramer M.D., P.C. (2020 NY Slip Op 06474) Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Cohen & Kramer M.D., P.C. 2020 NY Slip Op 06474 Decided on November 12, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department

(2008) David KRAMER, Individually, and as the President and Sole Owner of Certified Car Sales, LLC, a Missouri Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff's Deputy Steven STELTER, Individually and as a Deputy of the Du-Page County Sheriff's Office; John P. Creedon, Individually and as Director of the Tri-County Auto Theft Unit; Michael J. Colando, deceased, Individually and as a member of Pugi Kia, LLC and as the President and sole owner of

757 F.Supp.2d 511 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Helen KRAMER, et al., Defendant. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection, Plaintiff, v. Almo Anti-Pollution Services Corp., et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 89-4340 (JBS), 89-4380(JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 9, 2010.

BECKER, Chief Judge. Consolidation Coal Company (“Consolidation”) petitions for review of a determination of the United States Department of Labor Benefits Review Board (the “Board”) that occupational pneumoconiosis hastened the death of Claimant Beatrice J. Kramer’s deceased spouse, Marion W. Kramer (“Kramer”), who also suffered from metastasized colon cancer. Because we conclu

644 F.Supp.2d 479 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Helen KRAMER, et al., Defendant. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection, Plaintiff, v. Almo Anti-Pollution Services Corp., et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 89-4340 (JBS), 89-4380(JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 19, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered December 1, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on its causes of action for account stated, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion granted as to each such claim against defendants. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Defendants’ statements that they made oral protests about the

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about December 14, 1999, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff fails to show a reasonable excuse for his delay in prosecuting this now 13-year-old case which would warrant its restoration to the calendar (see, Todd Co. v Birnbaum, 182 AD2d 505, 506), nor wa

In two related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to property, the defendant Oil Services, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), dated March 8, 2007, which granted those branches of the respective motions of the plaintiffs in both actions which were for summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Navigation Law § 181. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to property, the third-party defendant Environmental Services appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), entered August 6, 2008, as denied its motion to vacate a prior order of the same court entered October 4, 2007, granting the defendant third-party plaintiffs unopposed motion for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability against it, upon its failure to

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about February 18, 1998, which, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate their default in appearing for oral argument of third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims against third-party defendant, and, upon vacatur, denied such motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs’ failure

90 Cal.Rptr.2d 301 (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 332 Edwin B. KRAMER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. E022409. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two. November 18, 1999. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing December 8, 1999. Review Denied March 1, 200

7ermont Superior Court Filed 08/08/24 Orleans Unit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Orleans Unit

7ermont Superior Court Filed 07/30/24 Orleans Unit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Orleans Unit

Vermont Superior Court Filed 02/0 24 Washmgton nit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT £3: CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit

568 July 2, 2025 No. 582 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Janice KRAMER, an Oregon individual; Rosemary Gramenz, an Oregon individual; and Joann Carriker, an Oregon individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert Eugene CONATSER, Defendant-Respondent, and