Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Kramer v. Cherry Creek School District No. 5”
Arndt v. P M Ltd., 2007-P-0038 (5-9-2008)public domain
OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the judgment of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas, granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, P M Ltd. (dba P M Estates, Modern Management Solutions, LCC, Raymond Vehovec, Carol Foster, and KMV V Ltd. For the following reasons, we affirm, in part, and reverse, in part, the decision of the court below and remand this matter for further pr
671 P.2d 1294 (1983) STATE of Colorado, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES, STATE ENGINEER, et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. SOUTHWESTERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants, and Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, et al., Appellees. No. 79SA38. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. July 18
Colorado Outfitters Ass'n v. Hickenlooperpublic domain
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER Marcia S. Krieger, Chief United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court following a bench trial on the Plaintiffs.’ claims under the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 et seq. Having considered the evidence presented
Gordon Schuster v. Prestige Senior Management LLCpublic domain
*621 Fearing, C.J. ¶1 Put more succinctly, at some point a party seeking to enforce an arbitration agreement must use it or lose it. Nino v. Jewelry Exch., Inc., 609 F.3d 191, 212 n.10 (3d Cir. 2010). ¶2 We ad
Rouch World LLC v. Department of Civil Rightspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Rouch World LLC v. Department of Civil Rightspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Rouch World LLC v. Department of Civil Rightspublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
106 F.Supp.2d 737 (2000) MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED v. A.E. STALEY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al. Velsicol Chemical Corporation, et al. v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company, et al. Nos. 96-3609 KSH, 96-3610 KSH. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. July 19, 2000. *738 *739<
Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1 v. City of Boulderpublic domain
992 P.2d 1188 (1999) The FOWLER IRREVOCABLE TRUST 1992-1, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF BOULDER, a Colorado municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. Nos. 97CA1005, 97CA1810. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. March 4, 1999. Certiorari Granted February 14, 2000. *1192 Ca
Bronco Wine Company v. Jollypublic domain
17 Cal.Rptr.3d 180 (2004) 95 P.3d 422 33 Cal.4th 943 BRONCO WINE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. Jerry R. JOLLY, as Director, etc., et al., Respondents; Napa Valley Vintners Association, Intervener. No. S113136. Supreme Court of California. August 5, 2004. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing October 13, 2004.
Voortman v. Bucks County Zoning Hearing Boardpublic domain
Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr., This is an appeal by James H. Voortman and Jane P. Voortman, husband and wife, from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County which affirmed the denial by the Bucks County Zoning Board of a variance from a public sewer requirement sought by the Voortmans to expand their nonconforming mobile home park. The Voortmans are owners of a 21.5 acre tract in
SC Holdings, Inc. v. A.A.A. Realty Co.public domain
935 F.Supp. 1354 (1996) SC HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. A.A.A. REALTY CO. et al., Defendants. A.A.A. REALTY CO. et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 95-0947 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 16, 1996. *1355
In re Patriot Coal Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO REJECT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS AND TO MODIFY RETIREE BENEFITS PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 1113, 1114 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE KATHY A. SURRATT-STATES, Chief Judge. The matter before the Court is the Motion to Reject Collective Bargaining Agreements and to Modify Retiree Benefits Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 1113, 1114 of the Bankruptcy Code and the UMWA’s
State of New York by Vacco v. Reebok Intern. Ltd.public domain
903 F.Supp. 532 (1995) The STATE OF NEW YORK, by Attorney General Dennis C. VACCO, et al., Plaintiff, v. REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD., et al., Defendants. No. 95 Civ. 3143 (JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 20, 1995. Pamela Jones Harbour, Joseph Opper, Linda J. Gargiulo, Assistant Attorneys General, New York City, for State of New York and loca
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
In Re Silica Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
398 F.Supp.2d 563 (2005) In re SILICA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. No. MDL 1553. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. June 30, 2005. *564 *565 *566 John R. Fabry, Liaison Counsel, for all plaintiffs. Darrell Lee Barger, Liaiso
In re Yawgerpublic domain
No opinion. Parts of the decree appealed from amrmed, with costs against the appellant personally. *1153INDEX ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL. ACCOUNT STATED. Right of action by or against personal representative, see “Executors and Administrators,” § 6. ABUTTING OWNERS. Assessments for expenses of public improvements, see “Municipal Corporations,” § 5. Compensation for taking of or injury