Cases

898 F.2d 339 22 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 908, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,316DECATUR CONTRACTING d/b/a Hoffman Construction Company, Inc.v.BELIN, BELIN & NADDEO, a partnership, Glen Irvan Corp.M.A.W.G., Inc., t/a C.A.M., Co., Erie Bearings Company,Place Electric Supply, Inc., Brumbaugh Insurance Group,United States of America (Internal Revenue Service),Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Department of Labor &Industry) and Com

*346{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, -and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent. Yoss Law Office and R

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Tribett v. Shepherd, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5821.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or o

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Eisenbarth v. Reusser, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5819.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or

O’Connell, J. The defendants Milivoje Kovac and Sylvester Beserminje appeal from the trial court’s order requiring them to perform substantial restorative acts on their property. They present two issues on appeal: “(1) Is the trial court’s ‘order granting preliminary injunction’ dated April 1,1991, a ‘permanent’ order, a final judgment, which is immediately appealable? (2) Does the trial court’s order granting ‘preliminary’ injun

BENNETT, Circuit Judge. The government appeals from a judgment of the district court1 awarding plaintiff-stakeholder, Millers Mutual Insurance Association of Illinois (Millers Mutual), attorney fees in an interpleader action, the effect of which was to reduce the amount recovered by the United States under prior federal tax liens. We reverse and remand. I. Background.

Peters, C. J. The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a temporary injunction should be deemed a *97permanent injunction, and hence an appealable order, because the injunction orders restorative work to be performed in order to prevent further environmental degradation. The plaintiff, the city of Stamford, brought an action seeking temporary and permanent injunctive

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge This case is on appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Case Nos. 12-B-20426, 15-A-00034. On Septem-ber 9, 2015, the Bankruptcy Court vacated its July 22, 2015 order and reinstated its original June 29, 2015 ruling in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Brenda Helms (“the Trus

876 N.E.2d 1150 (2007) Robert THOMPSON, Thompson's M/C Incorporated, and Thompson Realty, LLC, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. VIGO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Famco Fabrication Works, LLC, and Gregory L. Gibson, Individually, Appellees-Defendants. No. 84A04-0701-CV-26. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 30, 2007. Ronald C. Smith, Peter S. Kovacs, Stewart &am;

MEMORANDUM OPINION A. BENJAMIN GOLDGAR, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the court for ruling is the motion of chapter 13 trustee Marilyn O. Marshall to dismiss the case of debtors Robert C. Miller and Gwendolyn S. Miller. The trustee contends the Millers are ineligible to be chapter 13 debtors because their unsecured debt exceeds the limit in section 109(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 109(e).

Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge *782This case is on appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Case No. 17-11668. Appellant Glenn Stearns, Chapter 13 Trustee ("Trustee"), appeals from the Bankruptcy Court's order and memorandum opinion dated December 27, 2017, denying the Trustee's motion to d

OPINION AND ORDER JON E. DEGUILIO, Judge, United States District Court I. Introduction and Procedural Posture This is an appeal from an adversary proceeding relating to the Chapter 7 bankruptcy of Steven Bobinski. Mr. Bobinski’s bankruptcy follows litigation between himself and his former spouse Julie Thomas (f.k.a. Julie Bobinski) regarding their three children. During that litigation

[Cite as Kearney v. Campbell, 2016-Ohio-1332.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) PATRICK C. KEARNEY C.A. No. 27495 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE BENJAMIN R. CAMPBELL

273 B.R. 279 (2001) In re Iona Z. WHITE, Debtor. No. 01-06741-9P3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. December 18, 2001. *280 Edward R. Miller, Miller & Hollander, Naples, FL, for Debtor. Terry E. Smith, Bradenton, FL, Chapter 13 Trustee. ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTION TO CONFIRMA

Lau, J. ¶1 Developer Roger Gardner defaulted on loans secured by deeds of trust on three contiguous parcels of real property. First Heritage Bank conducted nonjudicial foreclosures in succession on each parcel. We hold the deed of trust act’s (ch. 61.24 RCW) antideficiency provisions do not *653restrict the bank’s ability to exhaust multiple items of collateral in a seri

Leach, C.J. ¶1 In this case we consider whether a property owner’s pre-foreclosure-sale remedies for alleged violations of the deeds of trust act (DTA), chapter 61.24 RCW; the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW; and the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, include recovery of monetary *302damages. We hold that a property owner

J-A05037-21 2021 PA Super 70 RONALD L. BURNETT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :

Cox, J. ¶1 Primarily at issue in this appeal of a CR 12(b)(6) dismissal is whether OneWest Bank FSB and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS) met their burden to show that Marisa Bavand failed to show any set of facts that would justify granting relief.1 Also at issue is whether the trial court properly granted the motion to validate the trustee’s sale of Bavand’s property by Regional T

2024 IL App (1st) 230069 No. 1-23-0069 Opinion filed December 20, 2024 FIFTH DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT EDWARD SHROCK and BABY SUPERMALL,

J-A05037-21 2021 PA Super 70 RONALD L. BURNETT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :