Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: In July 2013, Robert Kolinek filed suit against Walgreen Co. (Walgreens) on behalf of a class of similarly situated Walgreens customers. Kolinek alleged that Walgreens had made unsolicited calls to him and other current and former customers on their cellular telephones in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), 47 U

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER . John Robert Blakey, Judge Plaintiff Lawrence Brodsky (Plaintiff or Brodsky) claims'that Defendant Humana-Dental Insurance Coiripany (Defendant or HDIC) improperly sent him- two faxes in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. This Court previously certified a class of similarly-situated recipients in September 2016. [349] at 2

ORDER Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge Defendants’ motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, to refer the “subsequent consent” issue to the FCC under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, is denied. STATEMENT Defendants raise three arguments for dismissing plaintiffs TCPA claim: first, that plaintiff did not plead lack of prio

*780ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge Michael St. Clair has sued CVS Pharmacy under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for sending automated calls to his cell phone about prescription refills, even after he requested that the calls stop. Specifically, St. Clair alleges that he received automated calls from

SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Patrick Hudson received approximately 188 text messages from Defendants Ralph Lauren Corporation and Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. (collectively, "Ralph Lauren"), and Ralph Lauren's marketing company, Vibes Media, LLC ("Vibes"). Hudson thereafter filed this putative class action lawsuit against Defendants for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"),

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Court Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Fairview Health Services’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Samuel Zean’s' claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. For the reasons that follow, Fan-view's Motion is granted. BACKGROUND Fairview Health Service

PER CURIAM: Robert Lawrence appeals from the District Court’s order granting Bayview Loan Servicing; LLC (“Bayview”) summary judgment on his claims alleging that Bay-view had placed unwanted autodialed calls to his mobile phone in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii) of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). Lawrence asserts that the District Court erred in finding that, as a matter of law, the inclusion of hi

*796 ROVNER, Circuit Judge. In May 2011, Nicole Strickler brought this class-action lawsuit against Chicago-based retailer Bijora, Inc., doing business as Akira. 1 Strickler was later replaced as named plaintiff by Nicole Blow, who alleged that A

OPINION AND ORDER Joan H. Lefkow, United States District Judge Rusty Payton and Juan Soto filed suit against Kale Realty, LLC (Kale) and Voi-ceShot, LLC (VoiceShot), alleging that defendants sent unsolicited text messages to plaintiffs’ cellular telephones in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). (Dkt. 134 (Second Amend Compl.).) Defendants Kale and Voic

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART Re: ECF No. 25 JON Si TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Uber Technologies, Inc.’s (“Uber”) Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 25. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.. I. BACKGROUND1 On December 31, 20

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Joan B. Gottsehall, United States District Judge Plaintiff Physicians Healthsource, Inc. (“PHI”), for itself and on behalf of the class it seeks to represent (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), bring this lawsuit against Defendant A-S Medication Solutions, LLC (“A-S”), James Barta, Walter Hoff, and John Does 1-10 (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Telephone Cons

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge. Van Patten accuses Vertical Fitness and Advecor of sending two unsolicited’ text messages to his cell phone in violation of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act and California’s Unfair Competition Law. The Court previously certified a class for the TCPA claim. Now pending are cross-motions for summary judgment. <

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This action arises out of automated debt-collection telephone calls made by Defendants Department Stores National Bank (“DSNB”) and FDS Bank (“FDS”) in connection with Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s credit-card accounts. Plaintiff Ameer Hashw, acting on behalf of himself and a nationwide class of persons w

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY J. ST. EVE, United States District Judge Before the court are two motions: (1) that of defendant Quality Resources, Inc. to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or in the alternative for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c); and (2) that of defendants Sempris, LLC and Provell, Inc. to dismis

Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge Jonathan Gehrieh filed this suit in July 2012 as a putative class action against Chase Bank for alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Doc. 1. By July 2013, the parties were actively engaged in settlement discussions, Doc. 78, and in August 2014, they moved for prelimina

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE INTRODUCTION “Plaintiff is a professional class-action plaintiff who regularly works with [Law Firm of] Anderson & Wanca to file TCPA cases.” Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. Doctor Diabetic Supply, LLC, 2014 WL 7366255, at *7 (S.D. Fla. 2014).1 The plaintiff has