⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kleen Products LLC v. International Paper Company”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-08-04 · Published · cited 53× · 831 F.3d 919; 95 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 154; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14282; 2016 WL 4137371
WOOD, Chief Judge. The antitrust laws prohibit competing economic actors from colluding to agree on prices, either directly or through such mechanisms as output restrictions. See United States v. Socony-Vacumn Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 60 S.Ct. 811, 84 L.Ed. 1129 (1940); Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc., 498 U.S. 46, 111 S.Ct. 401, 112 L.Ed.2d
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-04-17 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 1582; 197 L. Ed. 2d 705; 85 U.S.L.W. 3490; 2017 WL 1366740; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2429
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-12-07 · Published · cited 17× · 910 F.3d 927
Wood, Chief Judge. *931Oligopolies have always posed problems for conventional antitrust law: without something that can be called an agreement, they elude scrutiny under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and yet no
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017-08-03 · Published · cited 2× · 276 F. Supp. 3d 811
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge Before the Court are the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Georgia-Pacific [ECF No. 1086] and Wes-trock [ECF No. 1088]. For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants the Motions. It therefore denies as moot the parties’ cross filings for partial summary judgment on the narrower issue of released and untimely claims [ECF Nos. 1114 and 1
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-03-26 · Published · cited 3× · 306 F.R.D. 585; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100466; 2015 WL 2330068
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Strike [ECF No. 845], and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [ECF No. 657.] These Motions have resulted in a deluge of briefing; the Class Certification Motion alone spawned seven separate briefs that total more than 300 pages (not including the attached exhibits) and that include
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐2808 KLEEN PRODUCTS LLC, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. GEORGIA‐PACIFIC LLC and WESTROCK CP, LLC, Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distr
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐2808 KLEEN PRODUCTS LLC, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. GEORGIA‐PACIFIC LLC and WESTROCK CP, LLC, Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distr
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011-04-08 · Published · cited 12× · 775 F. Supp. 2d 1071; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38546; 2011 WL 1343203
775 F.Supp.2d 1071 (2011) KLEEN PRODUCTS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. No. 10 C 5711. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 8, 2011. *1072 Daniel J. Mogin, The Mogin Law Firm, P.C., San Diego, CA, Michael J. Freed, Robert J. Wozniak, Freed Kanner
District Court, N.D. California · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 8× · 253 F.R.D. 508; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57119; 2008 WL 2949268
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. Now before this court are the motion of defendant Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. (“Safety-Kleen”) for summary judgment or partial summary judgment and the motion of plaintiffs Reymundo Perez and Jerrel Doane (“Plaintiffs”) for class certification. Jeremy R. Fietz and Barron E.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
81,7(' 67$7(6 ',675,&7 &2857 )25 7+( ',675,&7 2) &2/80%,$ ,1 5( 0&&250,&. &203$1< ,1& 3(33(5 352'8&76 0$5.(7,1* $1' 6$/(6 35$&7,&(6 /,7,*$7,21 0'/ 'RFNHW 1R  0LVF 1R 
District Court, S.D. California · 2017-09-26 · Published · cited 1× · 277 F. Supp. 3d 1167
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF Nos. 408, 409, 412) Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge Presently before the Court are: (1) Defendants StarKist Co.’s, Dongwon Industries Co., Ltd.’s, Bumble Bee Foods, LLC’s, Tri-Union Seafoods, LL
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005-06-30 · Published · cited 52× · 398 F. Supp. 2d 563; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14581; 2005 WL 1593936
398 F.Supp.2d 563 (2005) In re SILICA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. No. MDL 1553. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. June 30, 2005. *564 *565 *566 John R. Fabry, Liaison Counsel, for all plaintiffs. Darrell Lee Barger, Liaiso
Texas Supreme Court · 2022-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 20-0014 ══════════ AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., AMC Entertainment, Inc., and American Multi-Cinema, Inc., Petitioners, v. iPic-Gold Class Entertainment, LLC and iPic Texas, LLC, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-04-08 · Published · cited 217× · 31 F.4th 651
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC., BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD, PACIFIC D.C. No. GROSERVICE, INC., DBA Pitco 3:15-md-02670- Foods, CAPITOL HILL DMS-MDD SUPERMARKET, LOUISE ANN DAVIS MATTHEWS, JAMES WALNUM, COLIN MOORE, JENNIFER A. NELSON, OPINION ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG, LAURA CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; T
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007-08-10 · Published · cited 18× · 501 F. Supp. 2d 1145; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58815
501 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2007) CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GRAND POINTE, LLC, et al, Defendants. RLI Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. Grand Pointe, LLC, et al, Defendants. Nos. 1:05-CV-161, 1:05-CV-157. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga. August 10, 2007. *1146
United States Court of International Trade · 2024-10-04 · Published · cited 1× · 736 F. Supp. 3d 1279; 2024 CIT 106
Slip Op. 24-106 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE GLOCK, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge v. Court No. 23-00046 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s Motion to Deem Admitted its Requests for Admission and Compel Other Discovery Response
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-07-28 · Published · cited 28× · 967 F.3d 264
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 19-3640 ______________ In re: Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochlorine and Naloxone) Antitrust Litigation Indivior Inc. f/k/a Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Appellant ______________ On Appeal from the United States D
District Court, E.D. New York · 2018-09-17 · Published · cited 9× · 336 F. Supp. 3d 141
SPATT, District Judge: On April 27, 2018, the plaintiff Sean Mears ("Mears" or the "Plaintiff") commenced this racial discrimination action against Allstate Indemnity Company ("Allstate"), and The Jones Agency (the "Agency") (together, the "Defendants") in response to Allstate's disclaimer of coverage regarding the theft of the Plaintiff's personal property. The Plaintiff alleges that Allstate's disclaimer was based on his race, in
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-3279 ARANDELL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. XCEL ENERGY INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court f
Jackson v. Odenatpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-06-12 · Published · cited 21× · 9 F. Supp. 3d 342; 2014 WL 1202745
OPINION & ORDER JOHN F. KEENAN, District Judge: This action arises from Defendant Lee Odenat’s allegedly unauthorized use of Plaintiff Curtis Jackson’s likeness and intellectual property as well as the intellectual property of Plaintiffs Tomorrow Today Entertainment, Inc. (“Tomorrow Today Entertainment”) and G-Unit Records, Inc. (“G-Unit Records”) on Oden-at’s website, www.worldstarhiphop.com.