Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Kistner v. The City of Buffalo”
Russell v. Goldman Roth Acquisitions, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge. This case involves a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and several related claims based on the actions taken by Defendants Goldman Roth Acquisitions, LLC (“Goldman Roth”) and Robert Vaiden (a/k/a William Kramer) in trying to collect on a debt
McCrobie v. Palisades Acquisition Xvi, LLCpublic domain
LAWRENCE J. VILARDO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On January 6, 2015, the plaintiff, Christopher McCrobie, filed this action seeking damages against defendants Palisades Acquisition XVI, LLC ("Palisades"), and Houslanger & Associates, PLLC ("Houslanger & Associates"). Docket item 1. McCrobie alleges that the defendants violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Kalebaugh v. Berman & Rabin, P.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DANIEL D. CRABTREE, District Judge. Plaintiffs Matthew Kalebaugh and Jessie L. Ray each filed a lawsuit against Defendant Berman & Rabin, P.A., alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. On September 24, 2013, the Court consolidated the two cases (Doc. 7).1 This matter is bef
OPINION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT COHN, District Judge. I. This is an antitrust case with pendent claims under Michigan law. Simply stated, Invictus Records, Inc., Holland-Dozier-Holland Productions, Inc. and Gold Forever Music, Inc. (plaintiffs) claim that beginning about 1972 defendants (described in detail below) conspired to drive them out of the “rhythm and blues” segment of the recorded mu