Cases

DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge. This cause comes before the Court after a Trial on the PlaintiffiDebtor’s Complaint to Determine Dischargeability. At issue at the Trial was whether the Plaintiff, Cindy Sue Pinckley Wolph, was entitled to receive a discharge of a number of educational debts pursuant to the “undue hardship” standard as set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). At

05/18/2022 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 24, 2022 Session1 METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, ET AL. v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court

NAHMIAS, Presiding Justice. **472Appellant Phillip Scott Kirby, Sr. was convicted of malice murder in connection with the stabbing death of Emily Mason. On appeal, he contends that his conviction should be reversed because the trial court erred in admitting custodial statements he made to GBI agents, hearsay testimony about a marking on his wed

USCA11 Case: 20-11310 Date Filed: 04/07/2022 Page: 1 of 30 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-11310 ____________________ KIRBY INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus LOUIS KUBIK, BLAKE DORNING, KEVIN TURNER,

Filed 7/14/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE MILAGROS AZUCENA WENDZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, A162648 v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF (San Francisco County EDUCATION et al., Super. Ct. No. CPF20517067)

PER CURIAM. Kelly Horwitz appeals from the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court’s denial of her contest of an election for the' office of Tuscaloosa Board of Education, District 4. We reverse and remand. Facts and Procedural History Horwitz and Cason Kirby were both candidates in the August 27, 2013, election for District 4 of the Tuscaloosa Board of Education. Kirby was certified as the wi

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge: The Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”) requires persons who buy or sell specified quantities of perishable agricultural commodities at wholesale in interstate commerce to have a license issued by the Secretary of Agriculture, see

NUMBER 13-22-00377-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE KIRBY OFFSHORE MARINE OPERATING, LLC On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Silva, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Be

JUDGMENT, MEMORANDUM, AND ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: I. Introduction... 94 II. Facts... 95 A. Initial Proceedings... 95 B. Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment.. .96 III. Law... 97

113 S.W.3d 145 (2003) Mitchell WILLIAMS, Individually; Mary E. Williams, Individually; and Mitchell Williams, Administrator of the Estate of Anthony Wayne Williams, Appellants, v. KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; Board of Claims; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellees. No. 2000-SC-0342-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. August 21, 2003. As Modified September 23,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JASON LEOPOLD, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-30 (RDM) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Jason Leopold is an investigative journalist who reports on national security. Dkt. 81-4 at 2 (Leopold Decl. ¶ 11)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JASON LEOPOLD, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-30 (RDM) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Jason Leopold is an investigative journalist who reports on national security. Dkt. 81-4 at 2 (Leopold Decl. ¶ 11)

MOORE, Chief Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). We have a duty to give a statute a construction “that will sustain its validity if reasonably possible.” Pruett v. Patton, 288 Ala. 710, 714, 265 So.2d 130, 133 (1972). In answering the second certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, the majority interprets “political activity” as that

MOORE, Chief Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). We have a duty to give a statute a construction “that will sustain its validity if reasonably possible.” Pruett v. Patton, 288 Ala. 710, 714, 265 So.2d 130, 133 (1972). In answering the second certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, the majority interprets “pol

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-CV-242 KIRBY VINING, APPELLANT, V. EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE DISTRICT OF

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Senior Judge HANSEN joined. OPINION WILLIAM W. WILKINS, Chief Judge: Carl Edward Kirby appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his action against the City

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Senior Judge HANSEN joined. OPINION WILLIAM W. WILKINS, Chief Judge. Carl Edward Kirby appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his action against the City of Elizabeth City, North Carolina (“City”); City Police Chief Trevor Hampton; and City Police Lieutenant Fr

Appellate Case: 21-4127 Document: 010110962271 Date Filed: 12/04/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH December 4, 2023 U

767 F.Supp.2d 452 (2011) Jeffrey KIRBY, Plaintiff, v. YONKERS SCHOOL DISTRICT and Bernard Pierorazio, in his individual capacity, Defendants. No. 07 Civ 10684 (WGY). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 11, 2011. *455 Michael Howard Sussman, Sussman & Watkins, Goshen, NY, for Plaintiff.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 10, 2016 Session ROGELYNN EMORY v. MEMPHIS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, NOW KNOWN AS SHELBY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH062420 Walter L. Evans, Chancellor