Cases

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Therman Jones appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Jones a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 15, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00010-CV MARGARET FIELDS, Appellant V. HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Co

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DELANEY G. MARKS, No. 17-99007 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:11-cv- 02458-LHK v. RONALD DAVIS, Warden, OPINION California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Cal

722 F.Supp.2d 44 (2010) William S. HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. KOENIG, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-618 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 10, 2010. *46 Bryan Taylor Veis, James Brian McTigue, James A. Moore, McTigue & Porter, Gregory Yann Porter, Bailey & Glasser, LLP,

MEMORANDUM MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge. Currently pending before this Court is Defendant University of Scranton’s (the “University) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44) and accompanying statements of facts and legal briefs, (ECF Nos. 45, 46, 54, 55), as well as Plaintiff Lisa Kimes’ brief in opposition and reply statement of facts. (ECF Nos. 52, 53). The matter has been fully briefed a

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

479 F.Supp.2d 1045 (2007) Stanley C. BRASCH, Plaintiff, v. Mary E. PETERS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Transportation,[1] Defendant. No. 4:05-CV-222 CAS. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. March 21, 2007. *1046 *1047

PER CURIAM: Defendants-Appellants Dr. James Davis, Dr. James Wohlgehagen, Roxanne Burleson, Corky Criswell, Beverly Sellers, and Marilyn Brooks, all educators or administrators in the Plano Independent School District, appeal from the district court’s partial denial of summary judgment. Defendants-Appellants contend that they are entitled to qualified immunity in their individua

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the court is Defendants Houston Independent School District (“HISD”) and Steven Amstutz’s (“Am-stutz”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (#21). Defendants seek summary judgment on Plaintiff Elaine Bluitt’s (“Bluitt”) claims alleging discriminatory employment practices under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S

236 F.Supp.2d 703 (2002) Elaine BLUITT, Plaintiff, v. HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT and Steven Amstutz, Individually and in his official capacity, Defendants. No. CIV.A.H-01-1195. United States District Court, S.D. Texas. October 14, 2002. *704 *705 *706

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM

144 Ariz. 65 (1985) 695 P.2d 1103 Brian Keith SCHILZ, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, Honorable Robert Pickrell, a Judge thereof, and The State of Oregon and Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Real Parties in Interest, Respondents. No. 17528-SA. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. February 7, 1985.

Argued April 15, 1926. This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to take off a non-suit in an action of trespass for personal injury. On the night of Saturday, September 19, 1925, the plaintiff went to defendant's store to get some meat which he had ordered by telephone earlier in the evening. He arrived there at twenty minutes past eleven o'clock, when defendant's employees were about closing the store. While he waited for a customer ahead of him to be served, two of defen

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state