⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Kingdom Holdings, LLC v. Foss”

Massachusetts Superior Court · 2016-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 33 Mass. L. Rptr. 626
Kaplan, Mitchell H., J. This case is again before the court on the Dutchess Defendants’1 motion to dismiss the derivative claims asserted against them by the Cannonball Plaintiffs2 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Dutchess Defendants argue that, under Cayman law, the Cannonball Plaintiffs lack standing to assert derivative claims against them on behalf of Dutch
District Court, District of Columbia · 2008-09-11 · Published · cited 7× · 577 F. Supp. 2d 124; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68769; 2008 WL 4167292
(2008) CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively on Behalf of BAE Systems PLC, Plaintiff, v. Richard (Dick) OLVER, et al., Defendants, and BAE Systems PLC, Nominal Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-1646 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 11, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-01-24 · Published · cited 5× · 848 F. Supp. 2d 410; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8234; 2012 WL 223240
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. This decision resolves a motion to compel arbitration. The Court holds that the dispute between Petitioner Glencore Ltd. (“Glencore”) and Respondent Degussa Engineered Carbons L.P. a/k/a Evonik Carbon Black L.L.C. (“Evonik”), and Evonik’s insurer, HDI-Gerling America Insurance Co. (“HDI”), is subject to a binding arbitration provision enfor
Pridgen v. Carlsonpublic domain
North Carolina Business Court · 2025-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NCBC 36
Pridgen v. Carlson, 2025 NCBC 36. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 24CV012229-910 TAMI L. PRIDGEN, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON ROY NEIL CARLSON; CARLSON DEFENDANTS ROY NEIL CARLSON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC; AND CARLSON FINANCIAL G.A. REPPLE &
District Court, S.D. New York · 2001-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 151 F. Supp. 2d 371; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8933
DECISION AND ORDER MARRERO, District Judge. Page TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 383 II. THE PARTIES 385 A. PLAINTIFFS.385 B. DEFENDANTS.385 1. Inside Directors/Management Defendants.385 2. Outside Directors.386 3. Se
District Court, S.D. New York · 1999-12-10 · Published · cited 76× · 78 F. Supp. 2d 194; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19329; 1999 WL 1138482
78 F.Supp.2d 194 (1999) In re LIVENT, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Actions. No. 98 Civ. 5686 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 10, 1999. *195 *196 *197 *198 Beatie and O
District Court, S.D. New York · 2001-06-29 · Published · cited 178× · 151 F. Supp. 2d 371
151 F.Supp.2d 371 (2001) In re LIVENT, INC. NOTEHOLDERS SECURITIES LITIGATION. This document relates to all actions. Alice F. Rieger, acting by and through her attorney-in-fact Robert L. Walters, Tri-Links Investment Trust, and Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Garth Drabinsky, Myron I. Gottlieb, Gordon Eckstein, Robert Topol, Conrad M. Black, Joseph Rotman, Scot