Cases

224 S.W.3d 369 (2006) QUALITY INFUSION CARE, INC., Appellant, v. HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, a Division of Health Care Service Corporation, and Southwest Texas HMO, Inc. d/b/a HMO Blue Texas, Appellees. No. 01-05-00753-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). October 19, 2006. *3

MEMORANDUM OPINION FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs in this antitrust case are Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota and of Massachusetts, the Federated Mutual Insurance Company, and the Health Care Service Corporation (hereafter collectively called “the Blues”). They opted out of a settlement premised on antitrust violations by the defendant, Mylan Laboratories (hereafter “My-lan”) and their

MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaints Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) [Civ. No. 01-2646 docket # 26] (“Def. Mot.”). Upon careful review of Defendants’ motion, Plaintiffs’ oppositions,1 Defendants’ reply thereto, the various supplemental filings of b

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TYNESIA STEWART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No.: K21A-02-003 RLG ) v. ) ) CHRISTIANA CARE ) HEALTH SERVICES AND ) UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ) APPEAL BOARD, )

OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from a challenge to the approval by the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary” or “HHS”) of a 2008 amendment to Pennsylvania’s state plan for administering its Medicaid program. Numerous private nursing facilities that provide services to Medic

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TAMEKA RICHARDSON, as NEXT ) FRIEND OF N.D., a minor, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N18C-10-026 JRJ ) CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH ) SERVICES

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TAMEKA RICHARDSON, as NEXT _ ) FRIEND OF N.D., a minor, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) C.A. No. N18C-10-026 JRJ ) CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH ) SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 25, 2021 Date Decided: June 21, 2021 Upon Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Causation Testimony from Dr. Neil Silverman and Dr. Harold Wiesenfeld — GRANTED Upon Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Limit Cumulative Expert Testimony — D

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1518 Doc: 51 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1510 KELLY M. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES; NORTH AMERICAN PARTNERS IN ANESTHESIA (VIR

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1510 Doc: 59 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1510 KELLY M. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES; NORTH AMERICAN PARTNERS IN ANESTHESIA (VIR

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 11 Lilya Andryeyeva, &c., et al., Respondents, v. New York Health Care, Inc., d/b/a New York Home Attendant Agency, et al., Appellants. -------------------------------------

Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this doc

22-1237 King v. Aramark Services Inc. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 (Argued: September 20, 2023 Decided: March 20, 2024) Docket No. 22-1237 KRISTEN KING, Plaintiff-Appellant,

701 F.Supp.2d 623 (2010) Diane HASKINS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-776-ER. United States District Court, D. Delaware. April 1, 2010. *624 Elwood T. Eveland, Jr., The Eveland Law Firm, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff. David H. Williams, James H. McMackin, III, Morris James LL

MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge. These proceedings arise from the D.C. Circuit’s remand of this action on jurisdictional grounds. On appeal, Defendants challenged, for the first time, the only basis for subject matter jurisdiction over the action — diversity jurisdiction. Defendants were able to demonstrate that at least one plaintiff was not diverse to ah of the defendants. Bec

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE Nos. 23-55157 DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta 23-55209 Medical Center; ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE D.C. No. DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley 2:20-cv-06564- Hospital; COUNTY OF SAN CBM-SP BERNARDINO; HEART HOSPITAL OF BK, LLC, DBA Bakersfield Heart Hospital; BEVERLY COMMUNITY OPINION HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, DB

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE Nos. 23-55157 DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta 23-55209 Medical Center; ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE D.C. No. DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley 2:20-cv-06564- Hospital; COUNTY OF SAN CBM-SP BERNARDINO; HEART HOSPITAL OF BK, LLC, DBA Bakersfield Heart Hospital; BEVERLY COMMUNITY OPINION HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, DB

OPINION BROWN, Judge. ¶ 1 The Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (“AHCCCS”) appeals the superior court’s determination that AHCCCS lacked jurisdiction and legal authority to bring an enforcement action against McKes-son Corporation under Arizona’s False Claims Act.1 As explained below, because AHCCCS adopted administrative rules2 that limited

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant violated a collective bargaining agreement by deeming certain employees reinstated to their former positions as “new” employees for purposes of their eligibility to health benefits, seniority status, and leave accruals, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Sher, J.), entered May 1, 2012, which denied its motion for summary judgment declaring that it d

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant violated a collective bargaining agreement by deeming certain employees reinstated to their former positions as “new” employees for purposes of their eligibility to health benefits, seniority status, and leave accruals, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Sher, J.), entered May 1, 2012, which denied its motion for summary judgment declaring that it d

Utopia Home Care, Inc. v Revival Home Health Care, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 07313) Utopia Home Care, Inc. v Revival Home Health Care, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 07313 Decided on October 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department