Cases

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/25/2018 09:08 AM CDT - 136 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 299 Nebraska R eports BELL v. GROW WITH ME CHILDCARE & PRESCHOOL Cite as 299 Neb. 136 Christopher Bell, as Special A dministr

#30884-a-MES 2025 S.D. 67 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** SONJA R. KING, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARY A. KING, Defendant and Appellant. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

Katelyn McMorrow v. Vernon King, III, No. 875, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Hotten, J. CIVIL PROCEDURE – RES JUDICATA – EFFECT OF DEFENDANT’S POST- JUDGMENT OBJECTION TO ADOPTION Where a plaintiff brings a constitutional claim attacking a defendant’s status as a de facto parent, that claim is barred by res judicata when the plaintiff has previously litigated the constitutionality of the status to a final judgment on the merits. The fact that the defendant exercises his de facto parent righ

[Cite as State v. King, 2022-Ohio-4616.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 21CA2 v. : EDWARD J. KING, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Defendant-Appellant.

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON JANUARY 25, 2024 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON JANUARY 25, 2024

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON JANUARY 25, 2024 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON JANUARY 25, 2024

Case: 21-50352 Document: 00516443696 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 23, 2022

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1115 Filed: April 28, 2023 FOR PUBLICATION * WILLIAM KING, ANTHONY GUGLIUZZA, STEPHEN DARDZINSKI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Noah A. Messing, Messing & Spector LLP, New York, NY, for the plaintiffs, with Phillip M. Spector and Jason H. K

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1115 Filed: April 8, 2022* FOR PUBLICATION WILLIAM KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Noah A. Messing, Messing & Spector LLP, New York, NY, for the plaintiffs, with Phillip M. Spector and Jason H. Kim, of counsel. Geoffrey M. Long, Commerci

HARVEY E. SCHLESINGER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1333THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendants' Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support (Doc. 115) and Plaintiff's Response and Memorandum of Law in Opposition thereto (Doc. 120). After careful consideration of the issues presented, Defen

For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS NATALIA MONE HILL CHINNERY ) S.Ct. Civ. No. 2024-0125 Appellant ) Re: Super. Ct. Case. No. ST-2023-CS ) 00016 (STT) y ) ) JULIO URREZ BARRISFORD KING II Appellee

Filed 1/5/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO KIRK KING et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, E063527 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1409797) COMPPARTNERS, INC. et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT Roger D. McDonough, J. Petitioner seeks a judgment: (1) setting aside or vacating the Growth Score and Rating (growth score) of petitioner of 1 out of 20, and the identification of petitioner as “Ineffective” for school year 2013-2014; and (2) declaring that the New York State Growth Measures (growth measures) are arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of discretion, and permanently en

KRUGER, J. *855 *1046 By statute, California's workers' compensation system provides an injured employee's "exclusive" remedy against an employer for compensable work-related injuries. ( Lab

Lynch, J. (dissenting). Because we do not agree that there is a sound and substantial basis for finding that the child’s best interests are served by awarding primary physical custody to respondent (hereinafter the father), we respectfully dissent.1 In our view, Family Court’s observation that it was “self-serving and convenient for [petitioner (hereinafter the mother)] to take prolonged advantage of

ABRAMSON, J„ DISSENTING: - For the reasons stated herein, I respectfully and strongly dissent. While Detective Anderkin’s ’ testimony concerning the Child Abuse Task Force was arguably improper, the error was not palpable. In addition, the time has comé for this Court to reconsider its rigid stance on the admissibility of Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAÁS) testimony and to align itself with the over

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: FORFEITURE STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Table of Contents I. Introduction... 881 A. The Criminal Charges.. .882 B. The Trials and Convictions... 883 C. The Moving Papers and Evidentiary Hearing.. .884 II. Authority for Forfeiture... 886 A

Lynch, J. (dissenting). Because we do not agree that there is a sound and substantial basis for finding that the child’s best interests are served by awarding primary physical custody to respondent (hereinafter the father), we respectfully dissent.1 In our view, Family Court’s observation that it was “self-serving and convenient for [petitioner (hereinafter the mother)] to take prolonged advantage of

06/07/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 23, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. AARON MICHAEL KING Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 114248 G. Scott Green, Judge No. E2021-01375-CCA-R3-CD Th

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON SARAH R. PENDLETON SEPTEMBER 19, 2024