⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc.”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 2691; 204 L. Ed. 2d 1090
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2015-09-17 · Published · cited 5× · 131 F. Supp. 3d 1088; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128753; 2015 WL 5476520
ORDER DENYING KING MOUNTAIN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, Chief Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 41. The Court heard telephonic oral argument on the motion on September 16, 2015. Trial Attorney Kenneth Sealls appeared on behalf of the United States, and Randolph Barnhouse appeared on behalf of King Mountain. The
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2014-01-24 · Published · cited 0× · 996 F. Supp. 2d 1061; 2014 WL 267160; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9184
ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by the United States, ECF No. 134. A similar motion was filed in the related ease United States v. King Mountain Tobacco Co., Case No. 12-3089 at ECF No. 48. The Court heard oral argument on the motions in both cases. John Adams Moore, Jr., and
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2013-02-11 · Published · cited 0× · 923 F. Supp. 2d 1280; 2013 WL 526761; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18227
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, Chief Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 52. The Court has reviewed the motion, the memoranda in support and opposition, the statements of fact, the affidavits and declarations of the parties, all other relevant filings, and is fully informed. BACKG
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-09-26 · Published · cited 13× · 768 F.3d 989; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 18494; 2014 WL 4783092
OPINION CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge: King Mountain Tobacco Company and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation (collectively “Appellants”) sued the Attorney General of the State of Washington for declaratory and injunctive relief from Washington’s escrow statute, Wash. Rev.Code §§ 70.157.005-70.157.030 (2013). The escrow statute require
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-06-11 · Published · cited 31× · 569 F.3d 932; 90 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1909; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13481; 2009 WL 1622338
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: Defendants King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc., and Yakama Tribe members Delbert Wheeler and Richard “Kip” Ramsey allegedly infringed federal and state trademark rights of Philip Morris by selling cigarettes with packaging and designs that resemble those of Philip Morris’s flagship Marlboro brand. Philip Morris sued the defendants in federal distri
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-01-20 · Published · cited 0× · 552 F.3d 1098; 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1683; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 907; 2009 WL 115589
*1111WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, concurring in judgment: I concur in the judgment. King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc., and Yakama Tribe members Delbert Wheeler and Richard “Kip” Ramsey (collectively, “tribal member defendants” or “defendants”) allegedly infringed federal and state trademark rights of Philip Morris by se
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-10-08 · Published · cited 7× · 55 F. Supp. 3d 301; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143449; 2014 WL 5026382
DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On December 21, 2012, the Plaintiff State of New York (the “State”) filed this complaint against the Defendant King Mountain Tobacco Company, d/b/a/ King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc. (“King Mountain”); Mountain Tobacco Distributing Company Inc.; and Delbert Lauren Wheeler, Sr., alleging violations of the Contraband Cigarette Trafficking Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2341-2346 (
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-12-16 · Published · cited 0× · 66 F. Supp. 3d 293; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173593; 2014 WL 7174239
DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On December 21, 2012, the Plaintiff State of New York (the “State”) filed this complaint against the Defendant Mountain Tobacco Company, d/b/a/ King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc. (“King Mountain”); Mountain Tobacco Distributing Company Inc. (“Mountain Tobacco Distributing”); and Delbert Wheeler, Sr. (“Wheeler”), alleging violations of the Contraband Cigarette Traf
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-07-11 · Published · cited 5× · 953 F. Supp. 2d 385; 2013 WL 3488262; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97771
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The following facts are drawn from the parties’ pleadings for purposes of this order and do not constitute the findings of the Court. The Defendant Mountain Tobacco Company, d/b/a/ King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc. (“King Mountain”) is a corporation formed under the laws of the Yakama Nation of Indians and is engaged in the busin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-08-13 · Published · cited 1× · 899 F.3d 954
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 14-36055 Plaintiff-Appellee, 16-35607 v. D.C. No. 2:12-cv-03089- KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO RMP COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-11-07 · Published · cited 40× · 942 F.3d 536
17‐3198(L) State of New York v. Mountain Tobacco Company United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2018 Nos. 17‐3198(L), 17‐3222(XAP) STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff‐Appellee‐Cross‐Appellant, v. MOUNTAIN TOBACCO COMPANY, DBA KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO COMPANY INC., Def
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-01-20 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 06-36066 KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO  D.C. No. CV-06-03073-RHW COMPANY, INC.; MOUNTAIN TOBACCO; DELBERT L. WHEELER, OPINION SR.; RICHARD KIP RAMSEY, Defendants-Appellees.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-06-11 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.,  No. 06-36066 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-06-03073-RHW KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO  ORDER COMPANY, INC.; MOUNTAIN AMENDING TOBACCO; DELBERT L. WHEELER, OPINION AND SR.; RICHARD KIP RAMSEY, AMENDED
New York Supreme Court · 2014-12-23 · Published · cited 8× · 48 Misc. 3d 865; 13 N.Y.S.3d 777
OPINION OF THE COURT J. Scott Odorisi, J. This lawsuit arises out of the 2012 West Webster Christmas Eve ambush and the resulting deaths and personal injuries to first responders. Pending before this court are: (1) defendant Gander Mountain Company, Inc.’s August 25, 2014, motion to dismiss; and, (2) plaintiffs’ September 18, 2014, motion for the release of the grand jury minutes of the state criminal pro
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010-04-23 · Published · cited 2× · 36 So. 3d 1046; 2009 La.App. 4 Cir. 0461; 2010 La. App. LEXIS 569; 2010 WL 1634314
36 So.3d 1046 (2010) Gloria SCOTT and Deania M. Jackson, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.; American Brands, Inc.; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company; RJR Nabisco, Inc.; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation; Batus, Inc.; Batus Holdings, Inc.; Philip Morris, Inc.; Philiip Morris Companies, Inc.; et al. No. 2009-CA-0461. Court of Appeal of
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-09-16 · Published · cited 40× · 344 F.3d 753; 62 Fed. R. Serv. 608; 31 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1881; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19147
344 F.3d 753 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC., a nonprofit Minnesota Health Maintenance Organization; Healthpartners, Inc., a nonprofit Minnesota Health Maintenance Organization, Appellants,v.PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company, suing as Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation; Lorillard Tobacco Company, Inc.; Liggett Group, Inc.; Hill & Knowlton, Inc.; Council for Tobacco Research US
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., Appellants, v. DEBORAH NEFF, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dorothy Milinkovich, Appellee. No. 4D19-2646
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014-09-10 · Published · cited 113× · 767 F.3d 1082; 89 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1199; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17450
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals are yet another chapter in the ongoing tobacco litigation that began as a class action in Florida courts more than two decades ago and has since swollen the federal docket with thousands of individual cases. Today we are asked to decide the fate of 588 personal injury cases filed on behalf of purportedly living cigarette smoker
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2024-02-02 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED; and Opinion Filed February 2, 2024 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01231-CV HOUSE OF RAEFORD FARMS, INC., OZARK MOUNTAIN POULTRY, INC., AND FIELDALE FARMS CORPORATION, Appellants V. SOMMA FOOD GROUP, LLC, Appellee On