⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kimbrough v. Center for Justice Innovation”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-12-18 · Published · cited 0× · 877 F.3d 1069
BENTON, Circuit Judge.- St. Louis Effort for AIDS and Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region' and Southwest Missouri sued to enjoin the Health Insurance Marketplace Innovation Act of 2013 (HIMIA), §§ 376.2000-376.2014 RSMo Supp. 2013. The district court granted summary'judgment to Effort for AIDS but denied attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b).
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979-07-31 · Published · cited 7× · 478 F. Supp. 566; 28 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 376; 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10694
478 F.Supp. 566 (1979) Willie and Maria KIMBROUGH v. HOLIDAY INN. Willie and Maria KIMBROUGH v. HOLIDAY INN OF LIONVILLE, INC. and Holiday Inn of Lionville. Civ. A. Nos. 78-634, 78-1369. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. July 31, 1979. Joseph H. Foster and Richard A. Kolb, Philadelphia, Pa., for movant (defendant). Elisa B. Vela, D
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991-02-22 · Published · cited 35× · 921 F.2d 604
921 F.2d 604 64 Ed. Law Rep. 1020 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al., Defendants-Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,andLaurel-Jones County Branch of the N.A.A.C.P., Manuel Jones,Jr., Felicia Wheeler, Kelly Anderson and TabithaAnderson, Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ASSOCIATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION, InterveningPl
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014-07-21 · Published · cited 0× · 31 F. Supp. 3d 952; 2014 WL 3566520; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98757
OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for the sentencing of the Defendant, Christopher E. Pelloski. On July 11, 2014, the Court sentenced the Defendant to 12 months and one day imprisonment, a $10,000 fine, and a term of five years of supervised release for knowingly accessing with intent to view digital files that contained child pornography in viol
District Court, C.D. California · 2014-09-22 · Published · cited 0× · 49 F. Supp. 3d 669; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135211; 2014 WL 4758417
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BASED ON UNPA-TENTABILITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 GEORGE H. WU, District Judge. I. Background The Court is presiding over two sets of consolidated patent infringement cases filed by Plaintiff McRO, Inc., d.b.a. Planet Blue (“Plaintiff’ or “Planet Blue”): the “Track 1” cases, consolidated under Case No. CV-12-10322,
District Court, C.D. California · 2014-09-22 · Published · cited 4× · 55 F. Supp. 3d 1214; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135148; 2014 WL 5419425
*1216RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BASED ON UNPA-TENTABILITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 GEORGE H. WU, District Judge. I. Background The Court is presiding over two sets of consolidated patent infringement cases filed by Plaintiff McRO, Inc., d.b.a. Planet Blue (“Plaintiff” or “Planet Blue”): the
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991-01-22 · Published · cited 47× · 921 F.2d 604
GEE, Circuit Judge: Today we address two cases consolidated on appeal. In the first, the United States demands interdistrict relief to remedy the allegedly segregative effect of various actions taken by the State of Mississippi and by two school districts. We conclude that the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and that they provide a sufficient basis for us to review the district court’s decision; thus, we
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 30 F. Supp. 3d 1200; 2014 WL 3377695; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94124
UNSEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Plaintiff United States’ Sealed Motion for Downward Departure, filed August 16, 2012 (Doc. 146)(ex parte)(“Down-ward Departure Motion”); (ii) Defendant Kevin Nolfs Sealed. Sentencing Memorandum, filed October 25, 2012 (Doc. 149)(“First Nolf Brief’);
District Court, E.D. New York · 2016-01-21 · Published · cited 11× · 157 F. Supp. 3d 207; 2016 WL 270257
Statement of Reasons for Sentencing Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2) JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 209 A. Varying Degrees of Culpability of Child Pornography Offenders.., 209 B. Consistency in Sentencing.. .212 C. Defendant in Instant Case.., 212
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014-12-15 · Published · cited 0× · 77 F. Supp. 3d 1115; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179291; 2014 WL 7473803
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Nestor Valdez’ Sentencing Memorandum, filed September 24, 2013 (Doc. 72)(“Valdez Memo.”); and (ii) the United States’ Objection to the Pre-sentence Report and Response to Defendants [sic] Sentencing Memorandum, filed October 3, 2013 (Doc. 78)(“U.S. Memo.”). The Court held a se
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1998-10-23 · Published · cited 15× · 33 F. Supp. 2d 769; 1998 WL 842868
33 F.Supp.2d 769 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. VERTAC CHEMICAL CORP., et al., Defendants. No. LR-C-80-109. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. October 23, 1998. *770 *771 Sam Blesi, Department of Justice, Land & Natural Resources Division, Washin
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013-06-06 · Published · cited 0× · 948 F. Supp. 2d 89; 2013 WL 2450748; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79663
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM TAURO, District Judge. This matter stems from criminal proceedings against codefendants Carolyn Kravetz and Boris Levitin. On July 22, 2010, and November 15, 2010, this court sentenced Kravetz and Levitin, respectively. Both defendants filed sealed sentencing memoranda and letters of support with the court. These proceedings caught the attention of non-party
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-06-25 · Published · cited 181× · 576 U.S. 519; 135 S. Ct. 2507; 192 L. Ed. 2d 514; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4249; 83 U.S.L.W. 4555; 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 441; 2015 WL 2473449
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-04-08 · Published · cited 5× · 786 F. Supp. 2d 617; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57402; 2011 WL 1361539
786 F.Supp.2d 617 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Damien BANNISTER, Darrell Bannister, Christopher Hall, Cyril McCray, Eric Morris, Roger Patrick, James Ross, Derrick Tatum, Indio Tatum, Jawara Tatum, and Pedro Torres, Defendants. No. 10-CR-0053. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 8, 2011. *621 Loretta Lynch, U
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-06-25 · Published · cited 40× · 576 U.S. 519; 135 S. Ct. 2507; 192 L. Ed. 2d 514
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1988-04-08 · Published · cited 0× · 120 F.R.D. 43; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2881; 1988 WL 31807
OPINION BERTELSMAN, District Judge. This court is called upon to decide whether mandatory summary jury trials are a valid pretrial settlement procedure.1 2A summary jury trial was set in this case *44over the objection of the plaintiffs. A motion for reconsideration of that setting was filed by plaintiffs promptly after
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-05-16 · Published · cited 10× · 792 F. Supp. 2d 343; 2011 WL 1901645
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I.Introduction...............................................................347 II.Facts.....................................................................349 A. Defendant’s Childhood..................................................349
Hall v. Woodpublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983-12-07 · Published · cited 56× · 443 So. 2d 834
443 So.2d 834 (1983) C. Leo HALL, Mary Hall and Randy Lee Hall, Appellants, v. Dr. Eugene G. WOOD, Jr., et al., Appellees. No. 54546. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 7, 1983. *836 Russel D. Moore, III, Moore, Royals & Hartung, Jackson, for appellants. David K. McGowan, Jackson, for appellees. Before PATTE
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00718-CV 4288348 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Speake v. Granthampublic domain
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1970-09-23 · Published · cited 18× · 317 F. Supp. 1253; 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10147
317 F.Supp. 1253 (1970) Phillip R. SPEAKE, Earnest Gregory, and Milton Forte, Jr., a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, Milton Forte, Sr., Plaintiffs, v. Rader GRANTHAM, Dean of Men, University of Southern Mississippi, William D. McCain, President of University of Southern Mississippi, University of Southern Mississippi, Board of Trustees of Institutions of Higher Learning, W. V. Oubre, M. M. Roberts, and E. E. Thrash, Defendants.