Cases

665 S.E.2d 449 (2008) Curry SHAW, Employee, v. U.S. AIRWAYS, INC., Employer, American Protection Insurance Company, Carrier. No. 580A07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 27, 2008. *450 The Sumwalt Law Firm, by Vernon Sumwalt, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee. Littler Mendelson, P.C., by Kimberly A. Zabroski and

652 S.E.2d 22 (2007) Curry SHAW, Employee, Plaintiff, v. U.S. AIRWAYS, INC., Employer, American Protection Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants. No. COA06-1407. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 6, 2007. The Sumwalt Law Firm, by Vernon Sumwalt and Mark T. Sumwalt, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant. Littler Mendelson P.C., by Kimberly A. Zabroski

* * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Holmes and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy

BRYANT, Judge. Because there was no determination of disability by the Commission, plaintiff’s claim for death benefits was not barred pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-38. Further, because there was competent evidence in the record to support the Commission’s findings of fact determining that Curry Shaw’s death proximately resulted from a compensable injury, we affirm the Commission’s opinion and award.

WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., J. Linda Lane (“Lane”) appeals the judgment of the trial court granting a 25-foot-wide prescriptive easement to Johnny Roberts and Debra Roberts (“the Roberts”), across two tracts of land — one owned by Lane, and the other owned by Betty Shaw (“Shaw”). In two points on appeal, Lane asserts the trial court erred in awarding a 25-foot-wide prescriptive eas

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. It is undisputed that Kimberly-Clark’s only relevant Factory Mutual policy expired by its terms on September 30, 2003, that prior to that time Kimberly-Clark had determined not to renew the policy, so informing Factory Mutual in late August 2003, and that Kimberly-Clark never attempted to renew the policy. On October 9, 2003, after the Kimberly-Clark po

OPINION MAY, Judge. Kayla Hughes was killed in an automobile accident after she spent some time at I & I Steakhouse, a restaurant owned by LDC Enterprises. Her parents, Rebecca Shaw and Steven Hughes (collectively, “Shaw”), sued LDC alleging employees of the restaurant served alcohol to Kayla, who was sixteen at the time. LDC moved to dismiss three counts of the complaint on the ground they were gover

ORDER A lawyer for Pamela Podemski filed this action seeking to undo a seven-year-old Indiana judgment foreclosing her home mortgage. The district court, relying on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, see Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983), dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

14 F.Supp.2d 1290 (1998) Elaine ALFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK TISSUE COMPANY,[1] Defendant. No. CIV. A. 95-0259-RV-M. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. July 9, 1998. *1291 Richard A. Meelheim, Christa Meelheim, Birmingham, AL, James P. Rea, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs.

947 S.W.2d 128 (1997) Charles C. CAMPBELL and Barbara B. Campbell, Appellants, v. Wayne R. SHAW, Kimberly J. Shaw and Shaw Enterprises, Inc., Respondents. No. WD 53318. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 24, 1997. *129 Thad Mulholland, Columbia, for Appellants. Michael Riley, Jefferson City, for Respondents.

516 F.3d 1061 (2008) THE SHAW GROUP, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Beverly Gay MARCUM, and Belinda Gail Henly, Co-Administrators for the Estate of Van Ryan Marcum, Deceased, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. 06-4115, 06-4188. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 15, 2007. Filed: February 26, 2008.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION*39Defendant Coloplast Corp. moves for summary judgment on plaintiff-relator Amy Lestage's claim that Coloplast violated the anti-retaliation provision of the False Claims Act ("FCA"), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h).

22-1000 In re: Kimberly Bruce UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2022 (Argued: April 18, 2023 | Decided: August 2, 2023) Docket No. 22-1000 KIMBERLY BRUCE, Debtor and Plaintiff on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, AKA Kimberly A. Bruce, AKA Kimberly Ant

2023 IL App (1st) 221358 FIFTH DIVISION December 29, 2023 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT No. 1-22-1358 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA MARK DAUM, ) ) Supreme Court No. S-17835

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-19-00380-CR KIMBERLY LEIGH MOLL, APPELLANT V. STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 453rd District Court of

OPINION HAMILTON, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals and cross-appeals arise out of an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against a North Car*794olina state trooper and several of his supervisors by the wife and minor children of a citizen the trooper shot and killed during an arrest. I On Febru

PHILLIPS, Judge. The only questions of substance presented for our determination are whether the court erred in directing verdicts against plaintiffs’ claims based upon the second accident. Other questions are posed but they either have no basis or are superfluous. Plaintiffs’ arguments that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury *117as to their damages in the

Case: 25-10886 Document: 49-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED March 27, 2026

DARRIN P. GAYLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1356THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (the "Motion") [ECF Nos. 517, 522 (under seal) ].1 The action was referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia Otazo-Reyes, pursuant to