Cases

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 17) MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Kimberly Cox and Heather Claus initiated this putative class action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., alleging that Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (“BCBSM”)

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. 68) AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Kimberly Cox and Heather Claus initiated this putative class action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq„ alleging that Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich

*1253ORDER and OPINION DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge. Introduction Plaintiff Lana Robertson (“Robertson”) brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) seeking a declaration that a medical procedure she needs is covered by her employer-sponsored health benefits plan. The parties have filed cr

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01052-SCT IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF BARRY C. BLACKBURN, SR., DECEASED: JUNE HOLLEY OLIN, EXECUTRIX OF BARRY C. BLACKBURN, JR. v. GINGER RICHARDS AND KIMBERLY ARCHER, CO-EXECUTRIX AND CO-TRUSTEES OF THE BARRY C. BLACKBURN, SR., REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST AND HARPETH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, INC., NASHVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, INC., THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI AND BOYKIN SPANIEL RESCUE, INC. v. GINGER RICHARDS

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge. In November 2013, the Court granted partial summary judgment on the issue of liability to two Pennsylvania chiropractors, Barry Wahner and Mark Barnard, on their claims against Independence Blue Cross (IBC).1 See Pa. Chiropractic Ass’n v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass’n, 4 F.Supp.3d 929 (N.D.Ill.2013). Bar

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Plaintiffs Pennsylvania Chiropractic Association (PCA), Mark Barnard, D.C. (Bar*727nard), and Barry Wahner, D.C. (Wahner) have moved for an award of attorney’s fees and costs against defendant Independence Blue Cross1 (IBC) pursuant to 29 U.S.C

PD-1455-16 PD-1455-16 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/22/2016 8:48:50 AM Accepted 12/22/2016 2:44:22 PM

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Plaintiffs have sued a number of Blue Cross and Blue Shield entities for violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and Florida law. They have moved to certify several classes. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies plaintiffs’ motions. Background The plaintiffs in this c

713 F.Supp.2d 734 (2010) PENNSYLVANIA CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, New York Chiropractic Council, Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, Florida Chiropractic Association and California Chiropractic Association, on their own behalf and in a representational capacity on behalf of their members, and Gregory T. Kuhlman, D.C., Jay Korsen, D.C., Ian Barlow, Kendall Gearhart, D.C., Jeffrey P. Leri, D.C., Michelle M. Askar, D.C., Mark Barnard, D.C., Barry A. Wahn

MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, District Judge. This matter is before the court on various Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants. (Docs. # 107, 108, 110, 112-14, 116, 119, 121, 122, 125, and 135). On April 9, 2014, the court heard argument on certain aspects of the Motions to Dismiss with general application to Defendants and both categories of Plaintiffs. After careful review and with th

03/01/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs in Knoxville, November 28, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KIMBERLY JOHNSON HART Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 24609 Robert L. Jones, Judge ___________________________________

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 9, 2016 Session KIMBERLY MANGRUM v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court Dickson County No. 22CC-2014-CR-130 Larry J. Wallace, Judge No. M2016-00383-CCA-R3-PC – Filed October 11, 2016 The Petitioner, Kimberly Mangrum, appeals the Dickson County Circuit Court‟s denial of her petition

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00322-CR Kimberly R. SADA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

07/29/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 21, 2022 Session BUFFI LYNNE STANCIL EX REL. REBECCA MAE GENTRY v. DOMINION CROSSVILLE, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cumberland County No. CC1-19-CV-6523 J

635 F.Supp.2d 870 (2009) KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP, et al., Defendants. No. 09-C-429. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 6, 2009. *872 Christopher T. La Testa, Venable LLP, Baltimore, MD, Daniel T. Flaherty, Godfrey & Kahn SC, Appleton, WI, Lisa M. Kattan,

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-06-00082-CR Kimberly Michele ALEXANDER, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 144th Judicial Distric

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Opinion of the Court by POLLACK, J. This case concerns the decision of the Department of Environmental Services of the City and County of Honolulu to discontinue frontloader collection services to 181 multi-unit residential buildings and nonprofit organizations. We address whether the elimination of these government services is prohibited by constituti

FILE COPY COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00147-CV CITY OF ALEDO APPELLANT V. TODD C. BRENNAN AND VALERIE APPELLEES S. SMITH, FRANK GALLISON AND NANETTE GALLISON, REBECCA HANLEY, GORDON HIEBERT AND KIMBERLY HIEBERT, WILLIAM HOOD AND LEONILA HOO

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: All parties appeal the disposition of a suit involving six stock option, agreements. The district court held that Gary Olander owed Compass Bank (“Compass”) the profits received under two of the agreements. On appeal, Compass argues that it should have received all the profits. On cross-appeal, Olander and Whitney Bank (“Whitney”)