Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kimberly Perry”
State v. Perrypublic domain
DAVIS, Judge. Jason A. Perry ("Defendant") appeals from his convictions for felony breaking or entering, felony larceny, and two counts of obtaining property by false pretenses. On appeal, he contends that his plea of guilty was not knowing and voluntary because the trial court failed to inform him of the minimum sentence that he could receive under the Structured Sentencing Act. After careful review, we find no error.
State v. Perrypublic domain
CALABRIA, Judge. Ronnie Perry ("defendant") appeals from an order denying his motion for appropriate relief ("MAR") contending his judgment must be vacated. We affirm. Defendant pled guilty to possession of stolen goods in 2001. Ten years later, in 2011, defendant pled guilty to habitual driving while impaired ("DWI") and to attaining habitual felon status in Duplin County Superior Court. In defendant's plea arrangem
Am. Humanist Ass'n v. Perrypublic domain
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, United States District Judge This matter is before the court upon the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment [DE-68, 83]. The issues raised have been fully briefed and are ripe for adjudication. For the following reasons, the court grants plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and denies defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment. STATEMENT OF THE CASE On
Kimberly Ann Miles v. Daniel Weingrad, M.D.public domain
PERRY, J. Kimberly Ann Miles seeks review of Miles v. Weingrad {Miles II), 108 So.3d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), on the basis that it expressly and directly conflicts with Raphael v. Shecter, 18 So.3d 1152 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we quash the decision on review. BACKGROUND In 2002
Perry v. Ecolab Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM. In this workers’ compensation appeal, Claimant argues that the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred in denying his claims for penalties and interest on the late payment of compensation benefits. We agree the JCC erred, and reverse the order denying the claimed benefits. Here, the JCC conflated the determination of when benefits payable pursuant to an award are due with the determination of wh
Perry v. City of St. Petersburgpublic domain
PER CURIAM. In this workers’ compensation appeal, Claimant argues the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred in denying her request for medical treatment. Even though Claimant argues the JCC erred on multiple counts, we address only the overarching argument that the JCC erred in determining he was not required to address Claimant’s challenge, based on section 90.702, Florida Statutes, as amended July 1, 2013, regarding the
United States v. Perrypublic domain
OPINION GARTH, Circuit Judge: Terrance Perry (“Perry”) appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a), and his sentence. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm. I. In the early hours of June 15, 2003, Harrisb
Perry v. Ichida (In Re Ichida)public domain
434 B.R. 852 (2010) In re Todd Allen ICHIDA and Elizabeth Kimberly Ichida, Debtors. James E. Perry, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Todd Allen Ichida, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-53655. Adversary No. 08-2222. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division, at Columbus. August 30, 2010. *854 J. Matthew Fisher, Allen, Kueh
Adoption of Kimberlypublic domain
414 Mass. 526 (1993) 609 N.E.2d 73 ADOPTION OF KIMBERLY (and a companion case[1]). Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Hampden. November 4, 1992. March 9, 1993. Present: WILKINS, NOLAN, LYNCH, & GREANEY, JJ. Robin L. Stolk for the mother. Elizabeth A. Sickelco for the minors. David B. Perry
*770 RYAN, Circuit Judge. Defendant Johnson was, at the time this lawsuit was filed, the Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections. He appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss plaintiff's civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1981), arguing only that the trial court erred in deny
Rigdon v. Perrypublic domain
962 F.Supp. 150 (1997) Father Vincent RIGDON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dr. William J. PERRY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-02092. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 7, 1997. *151 *152 Kevin J. Hasson, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Washington, DC, for plainti
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 25–0671 Submitted March 24, 2026—Filed May 29, 2026 Michael Trask, Appellant, vs. Amar F. Ahmed, Sandro Younadam, Shellie O’Brien-Perry, Kimberly A. Willich, and Oforbuike C. Ewelukwa, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa
Kimberly Conlee v. ASI Lloydspublic domain
Opinion issued July 23, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00159-CV ——————————— KIMBERLY CONLEE, Appellant V. ASI LLOYDS, Appellee
Perry v. Warner (In Re Warner)public domain
247 B.R. 24 (2000) In re Kimberly G. WARNER, Debtor. John Perry, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Kimberly G. Warner, Defendant/Appellant. BAP No. MB 99-077. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit. March 31, 2000. *25 David C. Donahue, Donahue & Associates, Boston, MA, on brief for appellant. John F. P
United States v. PERRYpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HACKEL, GROSS, and BLOSSER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Antoine D. PERRY Aviation Ordnanceman Air
Perry v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Appellant was convicted by a jury for the offense of possession of cocaine in an amount less than twenty-eight grams. See TEX.HEALTH SAFETY CODE ANN. §481.115 (Vernon 1992). He pleaded "true" to two enhancement counts, and the trial judge assessed punishment at fifty years confinement. In two points of error, appellant contends that the court improperly sustained a challenge for cause made by the State, and that the
Perry v. Buchananpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/11/2023 08:04 AM CDT - 715 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 31 Nebraska Appellate Reports PERRY V. BUCHANAN Cite as 31 Neb. App. 715 DeTron L. Perry, appellant, v. Steve Buch
Scotty Howell v. Kimberly Howellpublic domain
Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 97 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and DIVISION III integrity of this document No. CV-20-275 2023.06.22 14:54:39 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 OPINION DELIVERED: MARCH 3, 2021 SCOTTY HOWELL
Perry v. Sada Three, LLCpublic domain
Perry v Sada Three, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 06456) Perry v Sada Three, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 06456 Decided on December 14, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
Perry v. Sada Three, LLCpublic domain
Perry v Sada Three, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 06456) Perry v Sada Three, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 06456 Decided on December 14, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431