Cases

*1054ORDER NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants Chung, Newton, and Moore’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Counts One, Two, Three, Eleven, and Twelve of the Second Amended Complaint (“Defendants’ Motion”) (Doc. Ill), the Response, and the Reply. Defendants’ Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

172 F.Supp.2d 1252 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank FERNANDEZ, aka "Sapo"; Juan Garcia, aka "Topo"; Mariano Martinez, aka "Chuy"; Jimmy Sanchez, aka "Smokey"; Crispin Alvidrez, aka "Conejo"; Fernando Alvidrez, aka "Cuate"; Javier Alvidrez Duarte; Marcel Arevalo, aka "Psycho"; Daniel Bravo, aka "Sporty"; Mario Castillo, aka "Whisper"; Robert Cervantes, aka "Gypsy"; Roy Galvadon, aka "Spider"; Dominick Gonzales, aka "Solo"; Davi

Johnson, Chief Judge, concurring specially. I fully concur with the majority opinion, but write separately to discuss the state’s failure to meet its burden of proof in this case of improper jury contact. A defendant is entitled to a trial by a jury untainted by improper influences, and when there has been an improper communication with a juror, the state bears the burden of proving beyon

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

ORDER Brian J. Davis, United States District Judge This is an action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA” or the “Act”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. It is before the Court on the Motion to Hear Additional Evidence (Doc. 51) filed by Plaintiff J.C., a minor, by and through his next friend, M.C.1 Defendant School Board of St. Johns County, Flori

DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillips, and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of D

DATE: 03/16/2016 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 08:44:17 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 08312015 GROUP 2 _____________________________________________________________________________

433 B.R. 419 (2010) In re LAKETOWN WHARF MARKETING, CORPORATION, n/k/a Laketown Wharf Marketing, LLC, Debtor. Corus Construction Venture, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corporation, et al., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-40692-LMK. Adversary No. 09-04009-LMK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. July 19, 2010.

900 So.2d 191 (2005) Marilyn LANDIAK v. Cedric L. RICHMOND, Fox McKeithen, Secretary of State of Louisiana, and Kimberly Williamson Butler, Clerk of Criminal Court of Orleans Parish. Marilyn Landiak v. Cedric L. Richmond, Fox McKeithen, Secretary of State of Louisiana, Kimberly Williamson Butler, Clerk of Criminal Court of Orleans Parish. Nos. 2005-CA-0385, 2005-CA-0386. Court of Appeal of

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: These cases require us to resolve several legal issues related to the rights of disabled children under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. In these three cases, parents of autistic children (collectively and in their respective pairs, “the parents”) declined school placements of

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 25, 2001 Session TIMOTHY JOE ELLINGTON v. LINDA MADDOX, ET AL. A Direct Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Haywood County No. 5644 The Honorable J. Roland Reid, Judge No. W2000-00948-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 12, 2001 Natural father filed a petition

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Nov 29 2018, 5:45 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court Co

169 B.R. 155 (1994) In re Lynn Andrew WARNER, Jr., Debtor. AMSOUTH FINANCIAL CORP., Plaintiff, v. Lynn Andrew WARNER, Jr., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91-32570-D. Adv. No. 92-0466. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. June 16, 1994. *156 Ellen Vergos, Memphis, TN, for AmSouth. Norman Hagemeye

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FIR TREE VALUE MASTER § FUND, LP, FIR TREE CAPITAL § OPPORTUNITY MASTER FUND, § No. 454, 2019 LP, and VERITION MULTI- § STRATEGY MASTER FUND LTD., § § Court Below: Court of Chancery Petitioners Below, § of the State of Delaware Appellants, § § C.A. No. 12456 v. §

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

MATTHEW VAISE V. STATE OF MARYLAND, Case No. 2205, Sept. 2018 SPEEDY TRIAL – SIXTH AMENDMENT – EFFECT OF NCR PLEA CHANGE DURING TRIAL PREPARATION ON BARKER ANALYSIS. In a complex murder case involving a defendant whose criminal responsibility was in question after he entered an NCR plea sixteen months into the parties’ trial preparation, when the State was prepared to proceed to trial, the focus of speedy trial analysis under Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), is on the NCR-related delay th

232 Cal.App.2d 628 (1965) In re Roland Barker on Behalf of DEBRA LYNN BARKER, a Minor, etc., et al., on Habeas Corpus. Crim. No. 10671. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Four. Mar. 3, 1965. Bruce P. Wolfe for Petitioner. Frederick M. Kraft for Respondents. *629 FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. [fn. *]</

236 Wis.2d 588 (2000) 2000 WI 93 614 N.W.2d 388 William J. VINCENT and Judy S. Vincent, individually and as parents of Tonya M. Vincent, Carol Bartlein, individually and as parent of Kurt Bartlein, Sara Bartlein and Kimberly Bartlein, Pam Britten, individually and as parent of Travis Britten, Cortney Britten and Taylor Britten, Karen Drazkowski, individually and as parent of Steve Drazkowski and Ann Drazkow

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT