Cases

07/09/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 4, 2025 Session KIMBERLY JONES-MBUYI ET AL. v. JILL FITCHEARD ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 23-1585-I Patricia Head Moskal, Chancellor __________________________

07/09/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 4, 2025 Session KIMBERLY JONES-MBUYI ET AL. v. JILL FITCHEARD ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 23-1585-I Patricia Head Moskal, Chancellor ____________________________

SUPERIOR COURT KIMBERLY JONES v. SUTHERLAND INULLATION, INC. and C.R.S. COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION SPECIALISTS, INC. Docket: 2484CV02156-C Dates: July 17, 2025

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, February 07, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25I0135. KIMBERLY W. JONES v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 2023CR230 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-26-00243-CR ___________________________ Ex parte Kimberly Jones On Appeal from the 213th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1922905 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack MEMORANDUM OPINION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA KIMBERLY MCLAUGHLIN, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE LORI B. JONES, JUDGE PRO TEMPORE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA, Respondent Judge, SUZAN MCLAUGHLIN, Real Party in Interest.

Darden, Senior Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Bank of America, N.A. ("Bank"), appeals the trial court's grant of Kimberly Congress-Jones' ("Jones") motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute and the trial court's denial of the Bank's motion to set aside the dismissal order. We affirm. Issues [2] The Bank raises five issue

BARBERA, J. This case has its genesis in an altercation between Kimberly Jones (hereafter “Petitioner”) and two Prince George’s County Deputy Sheriffs, Billy Falby and Gerald Henderson, during the deputies’ attempt to serve an arrest warrant for an individual at the home of Petitioner. Petitioner filed a twelve-count complaint in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, naming as defendants Deputies Falby and Henderson an

Opinion issued March 20, 2008 Opinion issued March 20, 2008

MEMORANDUM Jones, II, District Judge. 1. Introduction Plaintiff Muriel Collins, a long-term employee of Kimberly-Clark Paper Company, commenced this action against her employer, alleging agents of the company violated her civil rights during the final years of her employment. In particular, Plaintiff claims Defendant Kimberly-Clark, by and through its agents, unlawfully discriminated again

14 A.3d 1223 (2011) 197 Md. App. 638 STATE of Maryland, et al. v. Kimberly JONES. No. 2178, September Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 1, 2011. *1225 Matthew J. Fader (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen., on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Cary J. Hansel (Joseph M. Creed, Jos

NO. 12-19-00354-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: MARYE JEANNINE JONES, § MARYE GENEVA WATTS, JEFFREY SAMMONS AND DR. KIMBERLY § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING GREER, RELATORS §

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: *263 This case asks us to decide whether, under Texas law, a driver's neurobiological response to a smartphone notification can be a cause in fact of a car crash. Because answering in the affirmative would entail an impermissible innovation or extension o

OPINION ESPINOSA, Judge: ¶ 1 In Obergefell v. Hodges, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 2604-05, 192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015), the United States Supreme Court held “same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry.” In this special action, we are asked to decide whether, in light of that decision, the respondent judge erred by finding r

NO. 12-19-00354-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: MARYE JEANNINE JONES, § MARYE GENEVA WATTS, JEFFREY SAMMONS AND DR. KIMBERLY § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING GREER, RELATORS §

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Lisa E. Jones submitted a claim for disability benefits. Her plan administrator denied it. She sued under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) for denial of benefits and breach of fiduciary duty. The district court dismissed the fiduciary claim as “duplicative” of the denial-of-benefits claim. It then granted summary judgment against Jones on

ON MOTION PER CURIAM. ORDER Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Proctor & Gamble Company (Kimberly-Clark) move for summary affirmance of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia’s judgment in Hemphill v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., case no. 1:07-CV-01236. Kimberly-Clark also requests that this court impose sanctions against Allegra D. Hemphill for

605 F.Supp.2d 183 (2009) Allegra D. HEMPHILL, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION and Procter & Gamble Company, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-4 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 2009. *184 Allegra D. Hemphill, Washington, DC, pro se. Rebecca Goldsmith Lombard, Venable, LLP, Bla

Josephine Linker Hart, Justice, dissenting. The citizens of Arkansas have reserved through our constitution the right to appeal a circuit-court decision. It is the best—perhaps the only-way to ensure that when a citizen goes to court in Miller County, he or she gets roughly the same justice that a litigant receives in Greene County. I am therefore troubled when appellate cou

ON MOTION PER CURIAM. ORDER Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Proctor & Gamble Company (Kimberly-Clark) move for summary affirmance of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia’s judgment in Hemphill v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., case no. 1:07-CV-01236. Kimberly-Clark also requests that this court impose sanctions against Allegra D. Hemphill for