Cases

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-06-473 CV

CARR, District Judge. Plaintiff William Wiggins, an employee of the defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation’s Loudon, Tennessee, mill, brought this suit, in which he alleged contract claims based on alleged violations of the company’s alcohol policy and tort claims (intentional infliction of emotional distress/negligent infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, negligence, false imprisonment, and misrepresentation) a

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT KIMBERLY HARPER AND ) SHARON KAY HARPER, ) WD82465 ) Appellants, ) OPINION FILED: v. )

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00266-CV DAVID LEE CARPENTER, JR. APPELLANT V. SHARON K. CARPENTER, AKA APPELLEE SHARON KIMBERLY WEISE ---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3

02-11-266-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 14, 2011 Session LVNV FUNDING, LLC AS ASSIGNEE OF SEARS GOLD MASTERCARD v. KEVIN MASTAW Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County No. 10C-2671 Joe P. Binkley, Jr., Judge No. M2011-00990-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 30,

NO. 07-02-0461-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A OCTOBER 7, 2003 ______________________________ SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., APPEL

934 F.Supp. 713 (1996) Owen L. REED, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., et al., Defendants. Civil No. AMD 95-1259. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 16, 1996. *714 *715 Stephen Burgess Awalt, Towson, MD, for plaintiffs. Matthew T. Angotti, Baltimore, M

AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. The present dispute arises out of the ill-fated decision by defendants Barnes and Noble, Inc., BarnesandNoble.com LLC, and Nook Media LLC (collectively, “B <& N”) to enter the market for electronic readers (“eReaders”). In 2009, B <& N opened its electronic “bookstore” and launched a device for reading electronic content

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dr. Tiemoko Coulibaly and Dr. Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly appeal the district court’s orders granting the motions to dismiss their claims filed by Defendants other than JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss filed by

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs, a group of female inmates from two Missouri state prisons, brought this suit against various state and prison officials pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), claiming the defendant state prison officials have been deliberately indifferent to their serious medical needs in violation of their constitutional rights and rights secured under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S

518 F.Supp. 694 (1981) Henry P. HALSELL, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant. No. LR-76-C-208. United States District Court, E. D. Arkansas, W. D. July 24, 1981. *695 Bill R. Holloway, Lake Village, Ark., for plaintiff. James M. McHaney, Little Rock, Ark., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION</

BROWN, C.J. *1126These consolidated cases1 arise out of the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court, Bossier Parish. Plaintiff, Kimberly Reagan, appeals from a property partition judgment between herself and defendant, Melvin Reagan. For the following reasons we affirm in part, amend in part and as amended, affirm,

69 B.R. 743 (1986) In re Beverly Louise FAULK, Debtor(s). SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Plaintiff(s), v. Beverly Louise FAULK, Defendant(s). Bankruptcy No. 84-40587, Adv. No. 85-4009. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. August 18, 1986. *744 *745 James Kocher, Mari

HILL, Senior Circuit Judge: In this action, brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., the appellant, a former employee of Sears, challenge the district court’s award of summary judgment in favor of appellee. We reverse. FACTS The appellant, Charles Alphin, commenced employment with

*621Opinion DUFFY, J. Appellants Jeffrey R. Golin and Elsie Y. Golin (collectively, the Golins) appeal from the dismissal of this action after the trial court determined them to be vexatious litigants under Code of Civil Procedure section 391, subdivision (b)(2) and (3),1 and they failed to post a $500,000 bond to continue th

Weeden v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. CV-98-435-JD 05/25/99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Ronald W. Weeden v. Civil No. 98-435-JD Sears, Roebuck & Co. O R D E R The plaintiff, Ronald Weeden, brought this case against the defendant. Sears Roebuck & Company, asserting claims under the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601-2654, and state la

Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Opinion filed June 2, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00727-CV KIPP, INC., ST. LUKE’S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF HOUSTON, LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES, YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON, JULIUS WILLIAM “BILL” BOYAR, III, BOYAR & MILLER, P.C. D/B/A BOYAR MILLER, AND KIMBERLY STERLING ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A STERLING ASSOCIATES, Appe

396 B.R. 609 (2008) In re William Alan STAUDER, Kimberly Ann Stauder, Debtors. William Alan Stauder, Kimberly Ann Stauder, Objectors v. eCast Settlement Corp., Respondent/Claimant. No. 5-07-bk-51989. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. October 16, 2008. *610 John DiBernardino, Lehighton, PA, for Debtors.

Fountains-Clove Road Apartments, Inc., Respondent, againstMary Ann Gunther, Also Known as Mary Ann Dinger Gunther, as Surviving Issue of May Dinger, Deceased, Appellant, Mary Ann Gunther, Also Known as Mary Ann Dinger Gunther, and Robert Gunther, Also Known as Robert C. Gunther, Jr., Occupants-Appellants, and "John Doe," and "Jane Doe," Occupants. Appeal from an order of the Civil Co