Cases

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-1065 LT Case No. 2023-DR-003252-FM _____________________________ MIGUEL ANGEL DIAZ, Appellant, v. KIMBERLY ANNE NOLAN, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Russell L. Healey, Judge. William Falik, of William Falik

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 184 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Elizabeth Perry I attest to the accuracy and DIVISION II integrity of this document No. CV-20-504 2023.06.26 15:35:32 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 Opinion Delivered: April 21, 2021 ROBERT PRATT

Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 533 Digitally signed by Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2022.08.08 10:35:02 DIVISION II -05'00' No. CV-19-520 Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered: November 13, 2019 KIMBERLY PACE

183 Kan. 644 (1958) 331 P.2d 307 DeWAIN KIMBERLY, SR.; JEANNETTE KIMBERLY, a minor; CAROL ANN KIMBERLY, a minor; DEWAIN KIMBERLY, JR., a minor; JACKIE DEAN KIMBERLY, a minor; and DONNIE LEE KIMBERLY, a minor, by DeWain Kimberly, Sr., their father, as natural guardian and next friend, Appellees, v. IRA LEDBETTER, Appellant. No. 41,074 Supreme Court of Kansas.

671 F.Supp.2d 1040 (2009) Reid GINTER, Willie L. Bennett, Stephen M. Murphy, Richard Poston, Robert L. Vander Leest, Carmen Vander Leest, and Sandra Davis, on behalf of themselves and a similarly situated class, Plaintiffs, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and Whirlpool Corporation Group Benefit Plan, Defendants. No. 4:090-cv-408. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division.

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Kimberly Cloutier alleges that her employer, Costco Wholesale Corp. (Costco), failed to offer her a reasonable accommodation after she alerted it to a conflict between the “no facial jewelry” provision of its dress code and her religious practice as a member of the Church of Body Modification. She argues that this failure amounts to religious discrimination i

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2023-0680 LT Case No. 2018-CA-003982 _____________________________ PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. KIMBERLY ANN DAVIS, LAUREN ELIZABETH DAVIS, and CLAUDIA S. ALCAREZ, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval Cou

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00328-CV Edward Rudolph Turnbull, IV, Appellant v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline; Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel; Seana Willing; Timothy J. Baldwin; John S. Brannon; Daniela Grosz; Jenny Hodgkins; Amanda Kates; Daniel Martinez; Board of Directors of the State Bar of Texas; Benny Agosto, Jr.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2025 NO. 03-25-00328-CV Edward Rudolph Turnbull, IV, Appellant v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline; Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel; Seana Willing; Timothy J. Baldwin; John S. Brannon; Daniela Grosz; Jenny Hodgkins; Amanda Kates; Daniel Martinez; Board of Di

55 So.3d 725 (2011) Thomas FISCHER, Appellant, v. Kimberly FISCHER, Appellee. No. 5D09-1890. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 4, 2011. *726 Elaine A. Barbour, Orlando, for Appellant. Christopher H. Morrison, of Pratt & Morrison, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Thomas

Pratt v . NH DOC, et a l . 05-CV-367-SM 11/07/07 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Harvey Pratt, Plaintiff v. Civil N o . 05-cv-367-SM Opinion N o . 2007 DNH 136 N.H. Dep’t of Corrections, et a l . , Defendants O R D E R Pro se plaintiff, Harvey Pratt, is a former inmate at the New Hamps

ACCEPTED 15-24-00095-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/29/2025 3:50 PM No. 15-24-00095-CV CHRI

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge | Jacqueline R. McLennan appeals the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s decision to terminate her parental rights to her children A.R. and J.M. McLennan’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a no-merit brief pursuant to our rules and case-law, stating that there are no meritorious grounds to support an appeal. Ark. Sup. Ct. R.

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-725 ____________ DANIEL STAHL, Petitioner, vs. HIALEAH HOSPITAL, et al., Respondents. [April 28, 2016] PER CURIAM. We initial

736 F.Supp.2d 1226 (2010) RYKO MANUFACTURING CO., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. NATIONWIDE WASH SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. No. 4:09-cv-00182. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. September 8, 2010. *1228 Jan Mohrfeld Kramer, Smith & Kramer PC, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff/ C

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 70 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-24-198 Opinion Delivered February 5, 2025 JOHN DAVID HARRIS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE LOGAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, V. NORTHERN

JUDGE BOORAS, dissenting. { 19 I respectfully dissent from the majority's decision that water rights evidenced by shares in a mutual ditch company qualify as exempt from levy and execution by creditors under Colorado's homestead exemption statute. The majority reasons that by including a "farm" as property subject to the homestead exemption, the General Assembly in*427<

CARLTON, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. This case comes before the Court from the order of the Circuit Court of Pike County granting summary judgment in favor of Statcare, PLLC (Statcare). Adrienne Thornton filed a lawsuit seeking damages. She alleged that her employment with Wal-Mart was terminated because Statcare disclosed to Wal-Mart confidential medical information concerning Thornton without her authorization.

Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 331 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-15-884 Opinion Delivered: June 22, 2016 MICHAEL ATTEBERRY APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FRANKLIN V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge On February 23, 2015, the court entered a Protective Order Governing Confidential Material that places strict limits on who may receive documents designated as “Confidential Material.” ECF # 25 (“Protective Order”).’ As presently drawn, the Protective Order does not grant