Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kimberly Ann Mayer”
Kimberly Anne Hutson v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed September 12, 2019 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-19-00037-CR ___________ KIMBERLY ANNE HUTSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 32nd District Court Nolan
Kimberly Anne Hutson v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion filed July 8, 2021 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-19-00037-CR ___________ KIMBERLY ANNE HUTSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 32nd District Court Nolan Cou
Kimberly Yvette Garcia v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-09-00357-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D ----------------------------------------------------
Kimberly Yvette Garcia v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-09-00357-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 12, 2011 KIMBERLY YVETTE GARCIA, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FROM
288 F.3d 732 Barbara GRUTTER, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Lee BOLLINGER, et al., Defendants-Appellants (01-1447),Kimberly James, et al., Intervening Defendants-Appellants (01-1516). No. 01-1447. No. 01-1516. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 6, 2001. Decided and Filed: May 14, 2002 <
Kimberly Yvette Garcia v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-09-00357-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Kimberly Yvette Garcia v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-09-00356-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D ----------------------------------------------------
Kimberly Yvette Garcia v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-09-00356-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 31, 2010 KIMBERLY YVETTE GARCIA, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FROM THE 6
Carmen Austell v. Kimberly Sprengerpublic domain
RILEY, Chief Judge. Carmen Austell owned and operated T.Y.B.E. Learning Center, L.L.C. (collectively, TYBE), a daycare center in St. Louis, Missouri. After the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHS) denied TYBE’s license renewal request, TYBE sued several DHS employees and a state administrative law judge, alleging federal civil rights and state law violations.
Kimberly Yvette Garcia v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-09-00356-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Affirmed and Opinion filed August 7, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00046-CV GORDON WESTERGREN, SANDY WESTERGREN, RICHARD HELMLE, CAROLE HELMLE, CHRIS MILLER, KIMBERLY MILLER, PETER SUNDT, AND BRIAN JOHNSON, Appellants V. HOUSTON PILOTS ASSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 234th District Court
Weaver v. Massachusettspublic domain
Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. During petitioner's trial on state criminal charges, the courtroom was occupied by potential jurors and closed to the public for two days of the jury selection process. Defense counsel neither objected to the closure at trial nor raised the issue on direct review. And the case comes to the Court on the assumption that, in failing to
United States v. Damien Zepedapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10131 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:08-cr-01329-ROS-1 DAMIEN ZEPEDA, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Cruz Ex Rel. Cruz v. Alhambra School Dist.public domain
601 F.Supp.2d 1183 (2009) Lauren M. CRUZ, by her next friend Jean CRUZ; Valerie Herrera, by her next friend Carolina Herrera; Jennifer N. Cerros; Catherine Grempel, by her next friend Tina Grempel, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALHAMBRA SCHOOL DISTRICT; The City of Alhambra; Russell Lee Sung, Victor Sandoval, Lou Torres, William A. Vallejos, John H. Nunez, Robert L. Gin, Ruth E. Castro, and Barbara A.
Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. Herrmannpublic domain
Justice SOTOMAYOR delivered the opinion of the Court. *618 The Red River Compact, (or Compact), 94 Stat. 3305 , allocates water rights among the States within the Red Ri
McNulty v. Taser International Inc.public domain
217 F.Supp.2d 1058 (2002) James F. McNULTY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. TASER INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. Richard Bass, Involuntary Plaintiff, v. Taser International Inc., et al., Defendants. No. SACV 01-0395 DOC. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 29, 2002. *1059 *106
Petit v. City of Chicagopublic domain
239 F.Supp.2d 761 (2002) Robert PETIT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, Defendant. No. 90 C 4984. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 23, 2002. Order Denying Motion to Amend November 14, 2002. *763 Kimberly A. Sutherland, Chicago, IL, for Plaintif
City of St. Clair Shores General Employees Retirement System v. Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.public domain
635 F.Supp.2d 783 (2009) CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, On behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Derivatively On behalf of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. INLAND WESTERN RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC. Inland Western Real Estate Corporation; the Inland Group, Inc., Inland Western Retail Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc., Inland Southwest Management Corp., Inland North
Kimberly T. Daniels and Willie Daniels v. Christopher A. Yancey, M.D., and Diagnostic Clinic of Longview, P.A.public domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-05-00010-CV ___________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HON. JORGE L. ALONSO, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, the Board of Trustees of the City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System (“Pontiac Fire”) and the Board of Trustees of the City of Pontiac General Em*504ployees Retirement System (“Pontiac General”),1 allege that defendants