⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kimberly A Love”

Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017-08-18 · Published · cited 0× · 174 A.3d 761; 2017 VT 75
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2017 VT 75
In re Lovepublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2016-07-08 · Published · cited 0× · 553 B.R. 54; 75 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1764; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2634; 62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 223; 2016 WL 3679350
ORDER DENYING DEBTORS’ MOTION TO SELL REAL PROPERTY John E. Waites, US Bankruptcy Judge, District of South Carolina This matter comes before the Court on the motion of the debtors Thomas Leroy Love and Kimberly S. Love (collectively “Debtors”), seeking authority, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 363,1 to sell the estate’s interest in five (5) acres of real property located at 3752 Humbert Ro
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-12-18 · Published · cited 69× · 911 F.3d 260
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: *263 This case asks us to decide whether, under Texas law, a driver's neurobiological response to a smartphone notification can be a cause in fact of a car crash. Because answering in the affirmative would entail an impermissible innovation or extension o
Vermont Superior Court · 2017-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2017 VT 75
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2022-10-21 · Published · cited 0×
Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 21, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00387-CV DR. KIMBERLY EZELL, Appellant V. WEST LOVE, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011-06-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 12, 2011 Session KIMBERLY E. LOVE v. STEVEN D. BEARD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 59683 Robert E. Corlew, Judge No. M2010-01737-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 21, 2011 The plaintiff filed this action against her brother alleging
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997-05-09 · Published · cited 0× · 199 W. Va. 584; 486 S.E.2d 324; 1997 W. Va. LEXIS 107
PER CURIAM: This action is before this Court upon an appeal from the final order of the Circuit Court of Nicholas County, West Virginia, entered on September 12,1995. Pursuant to that order, the circuit court confirmed its prior order of July 31, 1995, dismissing the action from the docket as a sanction under Rule 37(b) of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure for the willful failure of appellant’s counsel to o
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2025-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 25, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KIMBERLY M. SMART Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 313010 Boyd M. Patterson, Judge FILED No. E2023-01688-CCA-R3-CD The Defendant, Kimberly M. Smart, was convicted by a Hamilton County jury of reckless aggravated assault, for which she received a sentence of three years’ incarceration. On appeal, the Defendant argues that (1) the trial court erred in admitting extr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-07-11 · Published · cited 23× · 73 F.4th 751
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHANE LOVE, No. 20-56003 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-06557- PA-SP AARON VILLACANA, Pasadena PD Officer, individually and in official capacity; THOMAS BUTLER, OPINION Pasadena PD Officer, individually and in official capacity; ROBERT G
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2022-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 TN WC App. 4
FILED Feb 09, 2022 12:03 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Gonzalez, Kimberlypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
PD-1455-16 PD-1455-16 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/22/2016 8:48:50 AM Accepted 12/22/2016 2:44:22 PM
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 05445
Matter of Kimberly J.-G. (Chantel J.-G.) (2024 NY Slip Op 05445) Matter of Kimberly J.-G. (Chantel J.-G.) 2024 NY Slip Op 05445 Decided on November 6, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-12-08 · Published · cited 2× · 516 S.W.3d 18; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 12966; 2016 WL 7670933
OPINION Opinion by Justice Garza Appellant Kimberly Gonzalez pleaded guilty to and was convicted of three counts of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”) with a child passenger, a state jail felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.045 (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). Gonzalez argues on appeal that her convictions
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2019-11-14 · Published · cited 8× · 451 P.3d 1152; 2019 WY 115
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2019 WY 115 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2019 November 14, 2019 PAUL A. WOODIE and KIMBERLY A. WOODIE a/k/a KYMBERLY A. WOODIE a/k/a KYM WOODIE, husband and wife, Appellants (Defendants), v. S-19-0047 JANET WHITESELL, Appellee (Plaintiff). PAUL A. WOODIE and KIMB
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024-01-10 · Published · cited 0×
CLEVELAND SPEARS, III * NO. 2023-CA-0664 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL KIMBERLY FAYE MCCLAINE * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIV
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 685 So. 2d 65; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13245; 1996 WL 727138
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Island City Flying Service v. General Electric Credit Corp., 585 So.2d 274 (Fla.1991). JOANOS, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Love v. Lovepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002-03-05 · Published · cited 39× · 75 S.W.3d 747; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 423; 2002 WL 337863
75 S.W.3d 747 (2002) Kimberly S. LOVE, Appellant, v. Karl David LOVE, Respondent. No. WD 59268. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 5, 2002. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied April 30, 2002. Application for Transfer Denied June 25, 2002. *749 B. Allen Heeke, Jr., for appe
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024-01-08 · Published · cited 0× · 89 F.4th 1065
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1830 ___________________________ Animal Legal Defense Fund; Bailing Out Benji; Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement; People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.; Center for Food Safety, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellees,
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-05-25 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), May 25 2016, 8:39 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK Indiana Supreme Court regarded as precedent or cited before any Court of Appeals
Kimberly Doe v. USApublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-07-27 · Published · cited 35× · 831 F.3d 309; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13696; 2016 WL 4036382
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Several female alien detainees filed lawsuits alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Federal Tort Claims Act, among others. The district court ruled in the defendants’ favor on various grounds. We AFFIRM in part, and REVERSE and REMAND in part. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL ' BACKGROUND The plaintif