Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kimberly A Krause”
Krause v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.public domain
749 F.Supp. 164 (1990) Jill Annette KRAUSE, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant. No. L89-30066 CA1. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan. January 17, 1990. *165 Aryon Greydanus, Lansing, Mich., for plaintiff. Richard A. Kitch, Kitch, Saurbier, Drutchas, Wagner, et al., Lansing, Mich., Rodney E. VanAu
Krause v. Turnberry Country Clubpublic domain
(2008) Kimberly KRAUSE, Plaintiff, v. TURNBERRY COUNTRY CLUB, JMB Golf Shop, Inc., and Jeffrey Buttitta, Defendants. No. 07 C 5329. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 17, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge. Plaintiff Kimberly Krause ("Krause") filed suit against Defendants
Holly Judge v. Shikellamy School Districtpublic domain
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. Holly Judge resigned her position at the Shikellamy School District after she was arrested on suspicion of drunk driving. Judge sued Shikellamy and a number of its officers (the Individual Defendants), claiming she was constructively discharged in violation of her constitutional and contractual rights. Because there is no genuine dispute that Judge resigned vol
People v. Comellapublic domain
Sawyer, P.J. The central issue in this case is whether, under the felony-murder statute,1 when the predicate felony is abuse of a vulnerable adult, the prosecution must prove that a defendant committed both first- and second-degree vulnerable-adult abuse.2 We hold that the prosecution must only show either offense, not both. Defendant’s wife, Ella, die
Dallas Morning News, Inc. v. Hallpublic domain
OPINION BILL MEIER, JUSTICE I. Introduction A private individual who sues a media defendant for defamation over statements of public concern bears the burden to prove that the statements are false, or not substantially true. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 776-77, 106 S.Ct. 1558, 1564, 89 L.Ed.2d 783 (1986); KBMT Operating Co. v. Toledo, 492 S.W.3d
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Millspublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT (April 12, 2016) Krause, Judge. Appellant Aswa Mills was convicted in the Virgin Islands Territorial Court 1 of two counts of first-degree murder, one count of attempted robbery, and two weapons offenses. A three-judge panel of the Distr
Halverson v. Astruepublic domain
600 F.3d 922 (2010) Kimberly A. HALVERSON, Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Appellee. No. 09-2076. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 14, 2010. Filed: April 2, 2010. *924 Thomas A. Krause, argued, West Des Moines, IA, for Appellan
In re TDpublic domain
Ronayne Krause, J. (concurring). I concur with the majority because the majority correctly explains that registration under the Sex Offenders Registration Act (SORA), MCL 28.721 et seq., is not “punishment” under Michigan law. Therefore, the trial court impermissibly determined that it constituted “cruel and unusual punishment” in this case. I write separately because I believe the trial court expressed very well-foun
James v. St. of CApublic domain
*134 Opinion DETJEN, J. Title 18 United States Code section 922(g)(9) 1 prohibits the possession of firearms by those convicted of a “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.” Section 921(a)(33)(A)(ii) defines “ ‘misdemeanor cr
May 05, 2006 Mr. Barry Snell Bayne Snell & Krause 8626 Tesoro Drive, Suite 500 San Antonio, TX 78217-6233 Mr. Mark J. Cannan Clemens & Spencer, Inc. 112 East Pecan Street, Suite 1500 San Antonio, TX 78205 RE: Case Number: 04-0681 Court of Appeals Number: 04-03-00832-CV Trial Court Number: 2003-CI-04682 Style: KRISTIN TERK BELT AND KIMBERLY TERK MURPHY, JOINT INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIXES OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID B. TERK, DECEASED v. OPPENHEIMER, BLEND, HARRIS
ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge This is a trademark infringement case brought pursuant to the Lanham Act. Plaintiff Luxottica Group, S.p.A. (“Luxotti-ca”) seeks to hold Defendants Greenbriar Marketplace II, LLC, and Albert Ashkouti liable based on a claim of contributory infringement. Luxottica manufactures, markets, and sells premium, luxury and sports eyewear under
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. At issue in this case is the proposed merger of the two largest hospitals in the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania area: Penn State Hershey Medical Center and Pinnacle-Health System. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) opposes their merger and filed an administrative complaint alleging that it violates Section 7 of the
Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.public domain
192 S.W.3d 780 (2006) Kristin Terk BELT and Kimberly Terk Murphy, Joint Independent Executrixes of the Estate of David B. Terk, Deceased, Petitioners, v. OPPENHEIMER, BLEND, HARRISON & TATE, INC., Glen A. Yale, J. David Oppenheimer and Kenneth M. Gindy, Respondents. No. 04-0681. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued September 29, 2005. Decided May 5, 2006.
Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.public domain
141 S.W.3d 706 (2004) Kristin Terk BELT and Kimberly Terk Murphy as the Joint Independent Executrixes of the Estate of David B. Terk, Deceased, Appellants, v. OPPENHEIMER, BLEND, HARRISON & TATE, INC., Glen A. Yale, J. David Oppenheimer, and Kenneth M. Gindy, Appellees. No. 04-03-00832-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. June 16, 2004. Barry Snell, Bayne
FILED 17-0637 12/21/2017 3:21 PM tex-21442760 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
FILED 17-0637 12/21/2017 3:18 PM tex-21442581 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK NO.
People v. Frankspublic domain
KRAUSE, J. *14*885Defendant Allen Bocteemus Franks killed his girlfriend, Kimberly C. On appeal, defendant contends that his conviction for voluntary manslaughter must be overturned due to his counsel's implicit concession during closing argument that defenda
Storek & Storek, Inc. v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc.public domain
122 Cal.Rptr.2d 267 (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 44 STOREK & STOREK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITICORP REAL ESTATE, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Storek & Storek, Inc., et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., Defendant and Respondent. Nos. A092772, A093724. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Five.
Gilchrist v. Your First Home, LLCpublic domain
Gilchrist v Your First Home, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 05307) Gilchrist v Your First Home, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 05307 Decided on October 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju
HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Margaret Armón Wilson allegedly died as a result of toxic shock syndrome (TSS) caused by her use of tampons manufactured by Kimberly-Clark Corporation. The administrator of her estate, National Bank of Commerce of El Dorado, sued Kimberly-Clark for wrongful death, asserting that Kimberly-Clark failed to test, design, manufacture, and label its tampons adequately. Kimberly-Clark moved for summa