Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 24-1594 _______________ ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate; ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY; SARAH SCHOENGOOD; SARAH FOR NEW JERSEY; CAROLYN RUSH; CAROLYN RUSH FOR CONGRESS v. CHRISTINE

*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 18-OCT-2023 08:27 AM Dkt. 60 OP

[Cite as Kim v. Randal A. Lowry & Assocs., 2023-Ohio-3232.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) JOHN Y. KIM, et al. C.A. No. 30350 Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTER

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed without costs, so much of the motion by defendant Ford Motor Company, and of the cross motion by defendant Patriot Ford, as sought summary judgment on the ground that the action against them is barred pursuant to a release denied, complaint reinstated, and matter remitted to the Civil Court for a determination of said defendants’ r

ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. This case involves a federal tax lien against plaintiff Mary Morris, wife and *1011alleged nominee, alter-ego, transferee or fraudulent conveyee of Daniel Morris, who owes $226,600.64 in unpaid taxes for 1997-2000. On June 8, 2011, defendant, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), filed a Notice of Feder

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2294 Doc: 55 Filed: 02/28/2024 Pg: 1 of 27 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-2294 LISA M.F. KIM, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.K., a minor; WILLIAM F. HOLLAND, and on behalf of all those similarly situated,

I,GASKINS, J. The plaintiffs, James and Kay Coker, appeal from a trial court judgment which granted an exception of prescription filed by Donald Ray Taylor, II, one of the defendants. We reverse and remand. FACTS On September 4, 2000, a fire destroyed the plaintiffs’ mobile home, barn and fields in Logansport, DeSoto Parish. On March 21, 2001, the plaintiffs filed suit against their ne

JUSTICE COTTER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Loren and Mary Hinebauch and Good Things, LLC (Hinebauchs), appeal from the order of the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Custer County, Montana, granting Douglas and Kim McRae’s (McRaes) motion for summary judgment. The Hinebauchs allege the District Court

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J. MCFADDEN, P. J. AND GOBEIL, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules March 15, 2024

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION *176At the outset, we note that this matter was filed as a civil action for hearing before the Trial Division, whereas the issues are properly matters before the Land and Titles Division. See A.S.C.A. § 3.0208(b). The matter shall be redocketed accordingly.1 Plai

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On November 28, 2011, Plaintiffs Heather Lindsey (“Lindsey”) and Geremy K. Lopez, individually and as guardians ad litem for RFL,. their minor daughter, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed this action against Kathryn S. Matayoshi in her official capacity

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-01132-COA MELCHESTER PHILLIPS JR., SARAH PHILLIPS, APPELLANTS KEITH PHILLIPS, NIKKI HOBSON, GAIL CAMPER, CAROLYN MOJGANI, CARLOS WILBORN, CHRISTOPHER WILBORN, KIM WILBORN, MICHAEL WATTS, MARK WATTS, TRACY WILBORN, EDDIE YOUNG III, CHERYL YOUNG, CAROL SUTTON, LYNETTE MYERS, KEVIN SMITH, MARY SMITH, MORRIS LOUISVILLE, SHANINA BRIDGES, NATASHA SMITH, BRIAN SMITH,

952 A.2d 346 (2008) 180 Md. App. 606 Eui KIM, et al. v. COUNCIL OF UNIT OWNERS FOR COLLINGTON CENTER III CONDOMINIUM. No. 723, Sept. Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. July 2, 2008. *347 Alyssa W. Chang, Germantown, for appellant. Frank J. Emig, Greenbelt, for appellee. Panel:

470 S.E.2d 177 (1996) 196 W.Va. 223 In the Interest of: TIFFANY MARIE S., Taylor Brook S., Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years Nancy S.E., Appellant, Department of Health and Human Resources, Appellee. No. 23198. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted February 6, 1996. Decided March 20, 1996.

Opinion filed September 18, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-24-00060-CV __________ JONATHAN HOBSON, JR., Appellant V. COMMISSIONERS COURT OF PALO PINTO COUNTY, TEXAS; COUNTY JUDGE SHANE LONG; COMMISSIONER GARY GLOVER; COMMISSIONER MIKE REED; COMMISSION

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

78 Cal.Rptr.2d 584 (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1284 Kim Marie THORBURN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. A076423. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Three. September 29, 1998. *585 Law Offices of Stephen D. Schear, Amy M. DelPo, Stephen

RAKER, Judge. Petitioners, a host of tobacco manufacturers and related entities, have filed a petition with this Court for a writ of mandamus or prohibition, asking that we direct the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to vacate its certification of two classes of Maryland residents who, as current or former users of tobacco products, have filed a suit against Petitioners claiming

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Sakhawat Ullah and Mary Katherine Gosho-Kim appeal their convictions on counts of transporting illegal aliens within the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Among other things, Ullah and Gosho-Kim contend that the district court improperly empaneled a fourteen-person jury and permitted it to deliver a nonunanimous g

MEMORANDUM ORDER RICHARD G. ANDREWS, United States District Judge Presently before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Declare This Case Exceptional Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285. (D.I. 329). I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On August 28, 2012, Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company brought suit against Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Comcast IP Phone, LLC al