Cases

451 S.W.2d 107 (1970) Richard H. APPELBAUM, William Hamilton, Edward Jones, Elsie Kuhn, John J. Moody, Harry Noe, and Joseph Walter, Individually, and also as representative of and for all of the citizens, residents, property owners, and taxpayers of the Village of St. John, Missouri, and Continental Can Company, a corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Defendant-Respondent, the Village of Bel-Ridge, Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER PER CURIAM. Appellant, Andrew Kieffer (“movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, dismissing his motion pursuant to Rule 74.06(b) to set aside a judgment. In the original proceeding, the trial court enforced a settlement agreement between movant and respondent, Nancy Kieffer (“respondent”). Mov-ant appealed to this court, and we affirmed in Kieffer v. Kieffer,

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR DR. PATT MCGUIRE, ) No. ED106860 ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) Ap

226 B.R. 204 (1998) In re KIEFFER-MICKES, INC., Debtor. Carolynne M. KIEFFER and Kieffer-Mickes, Inc., Appellants, v. Charles W. RISKE, Appellee. BAP No. 98-6029. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Eighth Circuit. Submitted September 9, 1998. Decided November 3, 1998. *205

WOLFE, Commissioner, This is a suit to enjoin the enforcement of a judgment for possession granted in an unlawful detainer action. The judgment was in favor of the St. Louis County Producers’ Market Company, which owned a market place of stalls. Sam Arky occupied one of the stalls. The injunction suit here under consideration was called for trial and the defendants announced ready. The attorney for Sam Arky announced that he

590 S.W.2d 915 (1979) Alan KIEFFER, Appellant, v. Eileen KIEFFER, Respondent. No. 61469. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. December 6, 1979. *916 Joseph A. Lott, Clayton, for appellant. Morton R. Newman, Clayton, for respondent. MORGAN, Judge. After affirming the trial court's modification of a divorce decr

154 S.W.3d 358 (2005) HTH COMPANIES, INC. and Thermaltech, Inc., Appellants, v. MO. DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, et al., Respondents. No. ED 84302. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. November 9, 2004. Application for Transfer Denied January 26, 2005. Application for Transfer Denied March 1, 2005.

ELLIS, Presiding Judge. Richard A. Waisblum appeals from a judgment of the Buchanan County Circuit Court granting summary judgment in favor of the City of St. Joseph, Missouri. Waisblum filed suit against the City of St. Joseph alleging the City negligently failed to maintain its sidewalks, resulting in injury and damages to Waisblum. The City moved for summary judgment on the grounds that Waisblum failed

704 S.W.2d 219 (1986) STATE ex rel. MISSOURI STATE BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR the HEALING ARTS, Respondent, v. Cheryl Lynn SOUTHWORTH, Appellant. No. 66799. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. February 18, 1986. *221 Michael A. Wolff, St. Louis, Martin Mazzei, Steelville, for appellant. David Brydon, Vicki J. Goldammer, Haw

278 S.W.2d 10 (1955) Elizabeth KIEFFER (Plaintiff), Respondent, v. Allen BRAGDON and Dudley A. Bragdon, Jr. (Defendants), Appellants. No. 29026. St. Louis Court of Appeals. Missouri. April 19, 1955. *12 Luke, Cunliff & Wilson, Hugh S. Wilson, John B. Busch, Wilton D. Chapman, St. Louis, for appellants. Robert W. Henry,

262 S.W.2d 591 (1953) COSTELLO et al. v. CITY OF ST.LOUIS et al. No. 43489. Supreme Court of Missouri. Division No. 1. November 9, 1953. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Denied December 14, 1953. *592 Samuel H. Liberman, City Counselor, Charles J. Dolan, Associate City Counselor, Freeman L. Martin, Asst. Ci

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Michael Scott (“Scott”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a bench trial. Scott sued his landlord, Janice King (“King”), for specific performance to enforce a sale agreement for the leased property. King counterclaimed for unjust enrichment and ejectment, arguing that Scott occupied her property without paying rent. The trial court found in King’s favor

*622MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FILIPPINE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motions for summary judgment of defendants St. Louis County, Kleinknecht, New-berry, and other unknown officers of the St. Louis County Police Department. Plaintiff has filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion. Defendants contend that su

251 S.W.3d 388 (2008) Terry KEEHN and Timothy Keehn, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. RUZICKA ELECTRIC & SONS, INC., Defendant/Respondent. No. ED 90469. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. April 29, 2008. *389 William E. Moench, St. Louis, MO, for appellants. Mark W. Weisman, Tiffany B. Kieffer, St. Lou

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE CHARLES CARMEN, ) No. ED108505 ) Appellant, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court

171 S.W.3d 158 (2005) Christopher L. WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. No. ED 85489. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. September 13, 2005. *159 Maleaner Harvey, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General

ORDER PER CURIAM. Lonnie Snelling, (“Appellant”), appeals pro se from a judgment dismissing an action he brought in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. Appellant filed his First Amended Petition alleging ten causes of action and naming the following as defendants: the State of Missouri, five judges, Lou Fusz Motors Company, Michelin North America, Inc., General Motors Corporation, t

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED99907 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. ) ) Honorable T

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge This appeal arises from the judgment dissolving the marriage of Lisa Rallo (‘Wife”) and Pete Rallo (“Husband”). Husband challenges venue, the custody determination, the division of property and attorney fees. We affirm. Husband and Wife were married in 2006. Wife was pregnant with a son at the time, and Husband was not the natural

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 193 Introduction What is the legal standard for modification of a judgment granting joint physical custody of a minor child? The modification in this case, as in many such cases, involves scheduling of time between mother and father. The statute governing modifications o