Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. v. United States”
Keystone Auto. Operations, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 25-46 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge v. Court No. 21-00215 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Denying in part and granting in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Reco
Keystone Auto. Operations, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 24-108 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge v. Court No. 21-00215 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Denying both Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions for summary judgment and ordering a trial in a Customs classification matter.]
Seil v. Keystone Automotive, Inc.public domain
678 F.Supp.2d 643 (2010) Robert SEIL, Plaintiff, v. KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:08-CV-701. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. January 6, 2010. *644 Martin McHenry, Haverkamp, Rebold & Riehl, Co., LPA, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiff. Craig R. Annunziata, Joel W. Rice,
LKQ Automotive D/B/A Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. and Jesus Duron v. Adan Robert Romopublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-25-00104-CV ———————————— LKQ Automotive d/b/a Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. and Jesus Duron, Appellants
Rt Automotive v. Westlakepublic domain
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE RT AUTOMOTIVE CENTER, INC., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. WESTLAKE SERVICES LLC, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 21-0148 FILED 04-12-2022 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2020-000834 The Ho
Keystone-Conemaugh Projects LLC v. EPApublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 22-3026 ___________ KEYSTONE-CONEMAUGH PROJECTS LLC, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; ADMINISTRATOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY _______________________
403 B.R. 300 (2009) In re DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Reorganized Debtors. James W. Korth, Appellant, v. Dura Automotive Systems, Inc., et al., Appellees. Nos. 06-11202 (KJC), 08-349-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 23, 2009. *301 Marcos Alexis Ramos, Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Wilmingt
E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-859 (Filed: 22 March 2023) *************************************** E-NUMERATE SOLUTIONS, INC., and * E-NUMERATE SOLUTIONS, LLC, * * Plaintiffs, * * Claim Construction; Markman Hearing; v.
Case: 21-2348 Document: 86 Page: 1 Filed: 06/30/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LKQ CORPORATION, KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellants v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2021-2348 ______________________ Appeal from t
Case: 21-2348 Document: 227 Page: 1 Filed: 05/21/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LKQ CORPORATION, KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellants v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2021-2348 ______________________ Appeal fro
Case: 21-2348 Document: 86 Page: 1 Filed: 06/30/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LKQ CORPORATION, KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellants v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2021-2348 ______________________ Appeal from t
Nordi v. Keystone Health Plan West Inc.public domain
989 A.2d 376 (2010) Cynthia A. NORDI, an Individual, Appellant v. KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN WEST INC., and Highmark, Inc., Appellees. No. 1476 WDA 2008. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued August 26, 2009. Filed January 22, 2010. *378 David S. Senoff, Philadelphia, for appellant. Michael P. Robic, Pittsburgh
Case: 21-2348 Document: 227 Page: 1 Filed: 05/21/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LKQ CORPORATION, KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellants v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2021-2348 ______________________ Appeal fro
470 F.Supp.2d 873 (2007) KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC. and Valhi, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE, COMPANY OF WAUSAU (f/k/a Employers Mutual Liability Company of Wisconsin), Defendants. No. 03-1201. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. January 24, 2007. *874 *875 Andr
235 F.Supp.2d 901 (2002) KEYSTONE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIAL INC., Plaintiff, v. MID-STATES DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., Blain Supply, Inc. and Oklahoma Steel & Wire Co., Inc., Defendants. No. 02-1139. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. December 3, 2002. *902 Richard N. Gentry, Jr., Vonachen Lawless Trager & Slevin,
Colonial Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 10-647C, 11-100C, and 12-900C (Filed: September 17, 2018) CONSOLIDATED ) COLONIAL CHEVROLET CO., ) INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) Denial of Summary Judgment; Fifth ) Amendment Taking; Disputed Is
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge Nicholas Angelopoulos (“Plaintiff’), an anesthesiologist, brings suit against his former business associate, Martin R. Hall (“Hall”), and the two businesses in which they were associates, Keystone Orthopedic Specialists, S.C. (“Keystone”), and Wachn, LLC (“WACHN”) (collectively, “Defendants”), for their alleged participation in a f
Naiser v. Unilever United States, Inc.public domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge. Terri Naiser and Jonnie Phillips, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), bring this putative class action against Unilever United States, Inc. (“Unilever”); LEK Inc. (“LEK”); and Conopeo, Inc., d/b/a Unilever Home & Personal Care USA (“Conopeo”). Plaintiffs’ action a
King v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 23-1956 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 08/18/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WILLIAM KING, STEPHEN DARDZINSKI, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ON BEHALF OF A CLASS OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ESTATE OF ANTHONY GUGLIUZZA, BY ITS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, ANTHONY A. GUGLIUZZA, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED ST
767 A.2d 572 (2001) KEYSTONE SPRAY EQUIPMENT, INC., Clyde Kennedy, Appellee, v. REGIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 18, 2000. Filed January 16, 2001. *573 Harry G. Mahoney, Philadelphia, for appellant. Jerry A. Lindheim, Philadelphia, for appellees. BEFORE: McEWEN, Pres