Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Keys v. Kerr-McGee Corporation”
Tronox Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.public domain
WESLEY, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from an order of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, J.) enforcing a permanent anti-suit injunction issued after a bankruptcy settlement. The tortured corporate histories and shifting legal theories involved make it a messy case to distil
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. Harrispublic domain
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part): I must dissent in part. “It was the duty of the trial court to reconcile the testimony of all the witnesses, if possible, without imputing perjury to any of them.” Williams v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 230 F.2d 293, 296 (5th Cir. 1956). Once that is done in this case what becomes cle
Tronox Inc. v. Kerr McGee Corp. (In re Tronox Inc.)public domain
Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM OF OPINION, AFTER TRIAL ALLAN L. GROPPER, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On January 12, 2009, Tronox Incorporated and 14 of its affiliates (the “Debtors”) *248filed for protection under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. On November 30, 2010, they confirmed a First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization (the
McIlravy v. Kerr-McGee Coal Corp.public domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. This diversity case has been through two jury trials and is again before us on appeal. Some two years ago, this court considered the case and reversed the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment as to the plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim. At a subsequent trial, judgment was entered for the plaintiffs, and the defendant, Kerr-McGee Coal Corpor
Stinnes Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Coal Corp.public domain
722 N.E.2d 1167 (1999) 309 Ill. App.3d 707 243 Ill.Dec. 98 STINNES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KERR-McGEE COAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 5-98-0105. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. December 14, 1999. Rehearing Denied January 27, 2000. *1168<
Stinnes Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Coal Corp.public domain
14 December 1999 NO. 5-98-0105 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT STINNES CORPORATION, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Williamson County. ) <
486 F.Supp.2d 1217 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Bobby MAXWELL, Plaintiffs, v. KERR-McGEE OIL & GAS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-cv-01224-PSF-CBS. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 30, 2007. *1218 *1219 Michael S. Porter, Mic
Carey v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.public domain
999 F.Supp. 1109 (1998) Jesse and Dorothy CAREY, married individuals; Nicholas and Deborah Dassion, married individuals, Rebekah Dassion, a minor by Nicholas Dassion her father, as natural guardian and next friend, and Mihailo and Janet Bozidarevic, married individuals, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. KERR-McGEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, and Kerr-McGee Corporation, a Delaware Corporat
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
Opinion Carman, Chief Judge: Before this Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56.2. Plaintiffs argue the Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Manganese Metal From the People’s Republic of China, 60 Fed. Reg. 56,045 (Dep’t Comm. 1995) (final determ.)
79 F.3d 248 42 ERC 1225, 64 USLW 2603, 26 Envtl.L. Rep. 20,824 Michael SCHIAVONE, Plaintiff,v.Herbert H. PEARCE; Donald B. Lippincott; Kerr McGeeCorporation; Penn Central Corporation, Defendants.KERR-McGEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Third-PartyPlaintiff-Appellant,v.UNION CAMP CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. No. 944, Docket 95-7627.
Kerr-McGee Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
HEARING OFFICER’S REPORT WIESE, Hearing Officer: Introduction The plaintiffs in this congressional reference case come before us after a protracted journey. Thirty years ago, Kerr-McGee Corporation and Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation (collectively referred to as “Kerr-McGee”) and Global Exploration and Development Corporation (“Global”) first filed applications for phosphate pro
Silkwood v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporationpublic domain
667 F.2d 908 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,367 Bill M. SILKWOOD, Administrator of the Estate of Karen G.Silkwood, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.The KERR-McGEE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, andKerr-McGee Nuclear Corporation, a Delawarecorporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 79-1894. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit.
Hartland Dean West v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporationpublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Hartland Dean West, injured in an explosion on an offshore oil platform, sued Kerr-McGee Corporation, the platform operator and majority owner, along with three companies that held minority interests in the platform. The district court filed a thoughtful opinion granting Kerr-McGee's motion for summary judgment on the ground that West was K
Justiss Oil Co. v. Kerr-McGee Refining Corp.public domain
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge: Kerr-McGee Refining Corporation (“Kerr-McGee”) owns and operates an oil refinery in Cotton Valley, Louisiana. In early 1990, the aluminum floating roof of a crude oil storage tank (“Tank 29”) at the Cotton Valley refinery collapsed.1 Kerr-McGee contacted Baker Tank Company, a division of Justiss Oil Company, Inc. (“Justiss”), and solicited a bid for the manufacture and inst
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
Memorandum and Order Restani, Judge: Plaintiffs move for judgment on the administrative record of the Final Determination on Remand of the International Trade Administration (“ITA” or “Commerce”) and ask the court to determine that sales of Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide (“EMD”) from Ireland were likely during the Period of Investigation (“POI”), December 1, 1987, to May 31, 1988, and to remand to IT
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
739 F.Supp. 613 (1990) KERR-McGEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Mitsui Denman (Ireland) Ltd., Intervenor-Defendant. CHEMETALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Mitsui Denman (Ireland) Ltd., Intervenor-Defendant. Nos. 89-03-00152, 89-03-00170. United States Court of International Trade. June 5, 1990
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
741 F.Supp. 947 (1990) KERR-McGEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, and Chemetals, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Tosoh Hellas, A.I.C., Defendant-Intervenor. Court No. 89-05-00276. United States Court of International Trade. June 28, 1990. *948 Drinker Biddle & Reath, W.N. Harrell
Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Hodelpublic domain
630 F.Supp. 621 (1986) KERR-McGEE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald P. HODEL, et al., Defendants. GLOBAL EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Donald P. HODEL, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 83-0322, 80-1085. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 6, 1986. As Amended June 27, 1986. Bruce
Hebert v. Kerr-McGee Corp.public domain
618 F.Supp. 767 (1985) Ferdinand J. HEBERT v. KERR-McGEE CORPORATION, et al. Civ. A. No. 83-0274. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lake Charles Division. August 22, 1985. *768 Stephen R. Streete, Salter, Streete & Hale, Lake Charles, La., for plaintiff, Hebert. Bert M. Cass, Eileen R. Madrid, Deutsch, Kerr
Aetna Casualty And Surety Company Of Hartford, Connecticut v. Kerr-Mcgee Chemical Corporationpublic domain
875 F.2d 1252 29 ERC 1680 AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.KERR-MCGEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION, American Potash & ChemicalCorporation and Kerr-McGee Refining Corporation,Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-2610. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Jan. 4, 1989.