Cases

369 F.Supp.2d 155 (2005) FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC., Plaintiff v. BOSTON COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 00-12234EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 2, 2005. A. William Urquhart, Adrian M. Pruetz, Aimee DeSantis, Christopher Tayback, Diane C. Hutnyan, Erica P. Taggart, Johanna Y. Ong, John J. quinn, Marshall M. Searcy, III

369 F.Supp.2d 159 (2005) FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC., Plaintiff v. BOSTON COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 00-12234-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 5, 2005. *160 A. William Urquhart, Adrian M. Pruetz, Aimee DeSantis, Christopher Tayback, Diane C. Hutnyan, Erica P. Taggart, Johanna Y.

OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA2023 OK 60Case Number: 120376Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 60, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA2023 OK 60Case Number: 120376Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 60, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

MURROW v. PENNEY2023 OK 91Case Number: 120915Decided: 09/19/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 91, __ P.3d __ JEFFREY MURROW and KRISTINE MURROW, Husband and Wife, individually, as Parents and and Next of Kin to MARISSA MURROW, Deceased, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v

MURROW v. PENNEY2023 OK 91Case Number: 120915Decided: 09/19/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 91, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. JEFFREY MURROW a

OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA2023 OK 60Case Number: 120376Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 60, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

MURROW v. PENNEY2023 OK 91Case Number: 120915Decided: 09/19/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 91, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. JEFFREY MURROW and KRISTINE MURRO

OSCN Found Document:OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

OSCN Found Document:MURROW v. PENNEY Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

[Cite as Brantley, Inc. v. Tornstrom, 2024-Ohio-2908.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA BRANTLEY, INC., ET AL., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 113425 v. : TODD W. TORNSTROM, ET AL.,

DATE: 11/18/2016 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 12:45:21 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302016 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________

HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. TASSIE KATHERINE

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff Next Century Communications Corp. (“Next Century”) appeals the district court’s judgment of dismissal in favor of defendant U. Bertram Ellis, Jr. (“Ellis”) on its Georgia state law claims sounding in fraud and negligent misrepresentation. On appeal, Next Century contends that viewed in the light most favorabl

OSCN Found Document:TOBACCO SETTLEMENT ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND v. STITT, ET AL. TOBACCO SETTLEMENT ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND v. STITT, ET AL.2026 OK 1Case Number: 123238Decided: 01/13/2026THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2026 OK 1, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNT

OSCN Found Document:HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. Based on the petitions, briefs, and argument, I am not persuaded that the 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Plan is contrary to law as reflected in the existing precedent. Although I am receptive to the concern that past decisions of the Court may suggest an unnecessarily stringent approach to equalization of population as between voting districts, I believe this could be addressed v

390 F.Supp.2d 63 (2005) FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC., Plaintiff v. BOSTON COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., Cingular Wireless LLC, AT & T Wireless PCS, CMT Partners and Western Wireless Corporation Defendants. No. CIV.A.00-12234-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 1, 2005. *64 *65<

[J-1-2018] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF : No. 159 MM 2017 PENNSYLVANIA, CARMEN FEBO SAN : MIGUEL, JAMES SOLOMON, JOHN : On the Recommended Findings of Fact GREINER, JOHN CAPOWSKI, : and Conclusions of Law of the GRETCHEN BRANDT, THOMAS : Co