⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kevin Taylor Mooney”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-04-25 · Published · cited 6× · 135 F.4th 486
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0105p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-App
State v. Taylorpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023-06-14 · Published · cited 0×
396 June 14, 2023 No. 301 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEVIN LAVIN TAYLOR, aka Kevin Lavan Taylor, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 17CR26979; A168298 On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, State v. T
State v. Taylorpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023-06-14 · Published · cited 6× · 326 Or. App. 396; 532 P.3d 502
396 Submitted on remand May 18, 2022, affirmed June 14, petition for review allowed October 19, 2023 (371 Or 509) See later issue Oregon Reports STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEVIN LAVIN TAYLOR, aka Kevin Lavan Taylor, Defendant-Appellant.
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2019-04-24 · Published · cited 3× · 826 S.E.2d 620; 241 W. Va. 495
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2019 Term FILED March 25, 2019 No. 17-0327 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Taylorpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021-11-17 · Published · cited 3× · 315 Or. App. 608; 501 P.3d 7
608 Argued and submitted March 10, 2020; affirmed November 17, 2021; petition for review allowed in part, limited to first question presented—as to that issue, decision of Court of Appeals vacated, case remanded to Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Jackson, 368 Or 705, 498 P3d 788 (2021), April 21, 2022 (369 Or 675) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent,
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2019-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2019 Term FILED March 25, 2019 No. 17-0327 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
04/20/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 3, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRAXTON LEVAR TAYLOR Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 18-758 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2004-07-14 · Published · cited 7× · 325 F. Supp. 2d 755; 21 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 667; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13313; 2004 WL 1588150
325 F.Supp.2d 755 (2004) Vinceann TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC. d/b/a First National Bank of Newton, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:03 CV 0023. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. July 14, 2004. *756 *757 *758
Hale v. Moorepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008-01-04 · Published · cited 13× · 289 S.W.3d 567; 2008 Ky. App. LEXIS 5; 2008 WL 53871
289 S.W.3d 567 (2008) Marie HALE; Joyce Jackson; Joseph D. Ledington; Beatrice Lynn Slominsky; and Linda L. Wishart, Appellants, v. Jennifer Melissa MOORE; Benny R. Adkins; Lena Valda Allen; Leah Carol Arnett; Nina R. Baker; Rose Brown; Deborah A. Cardinale; Susan D. Cook; Cumberland College; Estate of Irma Ray Brigman; Estate of Joyce Hunt; Estate of Robert Ledington; Estate of Sharon Bond; Estate of Thelma Hetkowski; Fernandez, Friedman, Grossm
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-02-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 28, 2011 Session NEAL LOVLACE and NORMA JEAN LOVLACE v. TIMOTHY KEVIN COPLEY AND BETH COPLEY Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hickman County No. 06-128-C Robbie T. Beal, Judge No. M2011-00170-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 3, 2012
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978-03-06 · Published · cited 4× · 562 S.W.2d 950; 1978 Tex. App. LEXIS 3042
562 S.W.2d 950 (1978) ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Lou Ann MOONEY, widow and Community Survivor of Kevin G. Mooney, Appellee. No. 8842. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. March 6, 1978. Rehearing Denied March 27, 1978. Underwood, Wilson, Sutton, Berry, Stein & Johnson, Clifford A. Stein and Richard F. Brown, Amarillo, for ap
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 03060
Matter of Camacho v Romero-Vanegas (2025 NY Slip Op 03060) Matter of Camacho v Romero-Vanegas 2025 NY Slip Op 03060 Decided on May 21, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2003-05-30 · Published · cited 13× · 265 F. Supp. 2d 732; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14695; 2003 WL 21283862
265 F.Supp.2d 732 (2003) TAYLOR MADE GOLF COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Taylor Made—Adidas Golf Company, Plaintiff, v. MJT CONSULTING GROUP, LLC, Marc W. Gunderson, and E-Golf Investments, Defendants. No. CIV.A.3:01-CV-2072-P. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. May 30, 2003. *734 Elizann Carroll, Molly B. Richard,
Johnson v. Phippspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010-06-16 · Published · cited 0× · 384 F. App'x 198
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kevin Johnson appeals the district court’s orders entered in accordance with the jury’s verdict and denying his post-judgment motions in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense
Johnson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 119 F. App'x 509
PER CURIAM: Kevin Johnson appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action and denying his motion for reconsideration. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 20(a). The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006-10-05 · Published · cited 38× · 252 F.R.D. 369; 39 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1735; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72609; 2006 WL 3831382
OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, CERTIFYING CLASS, AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND GRANTING INCENTIVE PAYMENTS TO CLASS REPRESENTATIVES MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs bring this class action lawsuit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., asserting, inter alia, Defendants breached ERISA-mandated f
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016-04-05 · Published · cited 18× · 491 S.W.3d 286; 2016 WL 1319543; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 323
ROBERT' M. CLAYTON III, Presiding Judge David É. Smith (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree assault, one count of first-degree robbery, and two counts of, armed criminal action. On appeal,' Defendant argues the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial and, in the alternative,
Foiles v. Foilespublic domain
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014-08-14 · Published · cited 6× · 338 P.3d 1098; 2014 COA 104; 2014 WL 3955261; 2014 Colo. App. LEXIS 1334
Opinion by JUDGE TERRY T1 In this probate action concerning the Clyde Foiles Trust and the Ruth Foiles Trust (the trusts), appellant, Gregory Kevin Foiles, who is a beneficiary of the trusts, appeals the judgment entered in favor of trustee and co-beneficiary Larry B. Foiles. We reverse the judgment and remand for further findings of fact and conclusions of law. 12 This case presents an
Clark v. Statepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008-05-27 · Published · cited 2× · 261 S.W.3d 565; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 728; 2008 WL 2169438
261 S.W.3d 565 (2008) Calvin (Kevin) CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 90209. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. May 27, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 15, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied September 30, 2008.
Duvall v. Tawneypublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010-09-14 · Published · cited 5× · 323 S.W.3d 804; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1231; 2010 WL 3553385
323 S.W.3d 804 (2010) David DUVALL, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Gary TAWNEY and Kevin Jones, Defendants/Respondents. No. ED 93886. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. September 14, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 2, 2010. *805 David Duvall, Acting p