Cases

ACCEPTED 15-25-00089-CV Appellate Docket Number: 15-25-00089-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS Appellate Case Style: Texas Department of Agriculture, et al. AUSTIN, TEXAS Vs. Be a Champion, Inc., James Hong, Kevin Klotz,

ACCEPTED 15-25-00089-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/25/2025 5:39 PM No. 15-25-00089-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ________________ CLERK

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PETRÓLEOS DE VENEZUELA, S.A., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0778-PAF ) PDV HOLDING, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) O

RADER, Circuit Judge. Following a bench trial, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois determined that the pa-roxetine hydrochloride anhydrate product produced by Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and TorPharm, Inc. (collectively Apotex) will not infringe claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 4,721,723 owned by SmithKline Beecham Corp. and Beecham Group, P.L.C. (collectively SmithKline). SmithKline Beecha

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 16, 2025 Decided December 5, 2025 No. 25-5037 CATHY A. HARRIS, IN HER PERSONAL CAPACITY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, APPELLEE v. SCOTT BESSENT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, ET AL.,

1 A.3d 310 (2010) YUCAIPA AMERICAN ALLIANCE FUND II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and Yucaipa American Alliance (Parallel) Fund II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiffs, v. Leonard RIGGIO, Stephen Riggio, George Campbell Jr., Michael J. Del Giudice, William Dillard, II, Patricia L. Higgins, Irene R. Miller, Margaret T. Monaco, Lawrence S. Zilavy, and Barnes & Noble, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

Lydia H. Grotti, M.D. v. Belo Corp., d/b/a Belo; WFAA-TV, L.P., d/b/a WFAA-TV (Channel 8) and WFAA-TV Co.; and Valeri Williams COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-105-CV

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0311p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION. ┐ ___________________________________________ │ │ ALBANY COUNTY

[J-10A-2024 and J-10B-2024] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. GARY D. WOLFE AND MARY O. WOLFE, : No. 73 MAP 2023 HUSBAND AND WIFE, : : Appeal from the Order of the Appellants : Commonweal

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. *374CONTENTS TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................375 PART 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................376 I.The Record and Relevant Proceedings ..................

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge Appellants, who are oil producers, sold their product to SemGroup L.P. and affiliates (including SemCrude L.P.), midstream oil and gas service providers and the Debtors in the underlying Chapter 11 cases. SemGroup sold oil to and traded oil futures with Appellees, downstream oil purchasers. The producers took no actions to protect themselves in case of Sem-Group’

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SHELDON K. RENNIE LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER JUDGE 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 10400 WILMINGTON, DE 19801 Date Submitted: August 17, 2023 Date Decided: September 19, 2023 Jason

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Sundiata Acoli v. New Jersey State Parole Board (A-73-20) (083980) Argued January 31, 2022 -- Decided May 10, 2022 ALBIN, J., writing for the Court. In this appeal, the Court considers whether, as

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Mers appeals the district court’s affir-mance of Marriott International Group Accidental Death and Dismemberment Plan’s denial of her claim for benefits. She asserts that two ERISA policies cover her husband’s death. Because the denial was based on a reasonable interpretation of the terms of both policies, we affirm the decision of the district court.

(2008) CITY OF MOUNTAIN PARK, GEORGIA, Plaintiff, v. LAKESIDE AT ANSLEY, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:05-CV-2775-CAP. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. April 15, 2008. ORDER CHARLES A. PANNELL JR., District Judge. This matter comes before the court on the motion for partial summary judgment by