Cases

Scudder, Circuit Judge. *900 This case arose from the destruction of personal property and artwork belonging to Christian Narkiewicz-Laine, an artist. Narkiewicz-Laine stored his artwork and other belongings in a space in Galena, Illinois that he rented from the defendants. Years into the l

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18‐2535 CHRISTIAN K. NARKIEWICZ‐LAINE, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. KEVIN C. DOYLE, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18‐2535 CHRISTIAN K. NARKIEWICZ‐LAINE, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. KEVIN C. DOYLE, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo

Opinion issued June 3, 2010 <

Opinion issued June 3, 2010 In The</

Opinion issued March 6, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

265 S.W.3d 28 (2008) Kevin Patrick DOYLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-06-01103-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). March 6, 2008. Discretionary Review Refused October 1, 2008. Rehearing Overruled April 23, 2008. *30 Hugh J. Plummer, Plummer & Farmer, Hou

Opinion GRUENDEL, J. The defendant, Christopher Doyle, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motions to suppress evidence of his blood test. He raise

35 A.3d 308 (2012) 133 Conn.App. 25 Nancy E. DOYLE, Administratrix (Estate of John A. Doyle), et al. v. Harold J. KAMM, et al. No. 31566. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued October 13, 2011. Decided January 17, 2012. *312 David M. Bernard, with whom was Joshua D. Koskoff, Bridgeport, f

TERRY JENNINGS, Justice, concurring. The majority erroneously concludes that this Court did not err in previously holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to suppress evidence of appellant, Kevin Patrick Doyle, in the underlying case in which appellant was convicted of the offense of driving while intoxicated. See Doyle v. State, 265 S.W.3d 28, 32 (Tex.App.-H

OPINION CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Presiding Judge. Appellants appeal the trial court’s judgment approving a class action settlement in favor of Herculaneum residents whose real property was affected by the Doe Run lead smelter. We affirm. Background Appellants are 28 objectors in a class of over 700 Plaintiffs (collectively, the Class) who suffered nuisance and

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge. This appeal addresses two principal issues: First, whether a group insurance plan is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 , et seq ., and second, whether

ED CARNES, Chief Judge: In the pre-Booker era, we presumed prejudice from a district court’s failure to ask a defendant if he had anything to say before sentence was pronounced, except in *1117 one circumstance. The exception was where the defendant was sentenced at the low end of the applicable

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J., at hearing; Bernard Fried, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered March 7, 1995, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed. In light of the information transmitted by the undercover officer, who made a drug purchase, to the arresting

200 S.W.3d 581 (2006) Sharon K. DOYLE, Appellant, v. Kevin M.J. CRANE and Connie Millican Sullivan, Respondents. No. WD 65654. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 12, 2006. *583 Maryteresa Doyle, Shawnee Mission, KS, for Appellant. Susan Ford Robertson, Jeffrey O. Parshall and Jeffrey H. Blaylock, Columb

Lauriat, Peter M., J. The plaintiffs, Kevin R. Doyle (“Doyle”), administrator of the Estate of James H. Cassidy (“Cassidy”), and Susan Healey (“Healey”) (collectively “the plaintiffs”) filed a six-count complaint against the defendants, James L. Gould and Stephen Abrams, Trustees of the New City Trust (“New City Trust”), Gould & Company, and Northeastern University (“Northeastern”) (collectively “the defendants”). On March

672 F.Supp.2d 858 (2009) Kristine FLYNN, Lenda Flournoy, Vernessia Parker and Debbie Ann Ramos, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Jim DOYLE, Governor of Wisconsin; Matthew Frank, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Corrections (WDOC); James Greer, Director, WDOC Bureau of Health Services (BHS); David Burnett, M.D., Medical Director, BHS; Kevin Kallas, M.D., Mental Health Director, BHS; Donald Hands, Ph.D., P

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas JUDGMENT Bruce Berg, Stuart Cartner, Kevin Doyle, Appeal from the 191st District Court of Walter Haydock, Edward Leh, Kevin Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. DC-11- Murphy, Philip Schantz, DAIS Partners, 15415). Memorandum Opinion delivered by L.P., Singer Bros., L.L.C., Skeleton Lak

ACCEPTED 06-14-00021-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/30/2015 11:23:51 AM DEBBIE AUTREY