Cases

517 F.3d 1120 (2008) Solomon WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, and Mara Ferrari; Rhonda Capps; Kevin Biglow; Doreen Ferguson; Beverly Trotter, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BOEING COMPANY; Boeing North American, Inc., a Delaware corp.; McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-35196. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 11, 2008.<

717 F.Supp.2d 1170 (2010) PLUMBERS UNION LOCAL NO. 12 PENSION FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMBASSADOR'S GROUP, et al., Defendants. No. CV-09-00214-JLQ. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. June 2, 2010. *1172 David A. Rosenfeld, Mario Alba, Jr., Samuel H. Rudman, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Melville, NY, John

104 F.Supp.2d 1220 (2000) Gretchen DUMAS, as Guardian ad litem for Nicholas Chaset, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PROPERTIES, INC., Major League Baseball Players Assn., et al., Defendants. No. 98CV1772-B (AJB). United States District Court, S.D. California. June 21, 2000. Kevin P. Roddy, Hagens and Be

499 F.Supp.2d 972 (2007) UNITED STATES ex rel. Donald E. HOWARD, et al., Relators, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 1:99-CV-285. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 28, 2007. *973 Gerald Francis Kaminski, U.S. Attorney, Frederick Mason Morgan, Jr., Jennifer Marie Verkamp, Volkema Thoma

539 F.3d 1157 (2008) Tash HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; Gregory Hicks; Erik Knutzen, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; Carolyn Jewel on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; Benson B. Roe, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, *1158 and Wired News; Condenet Inc., Intervenors, v. AT & T CORPORATION,

OPINION DIETZEN, Justice. Appellant Douglas Haefele (Douglas) and respondent Kathy Haefele (Kathy) were divorced pursuant to a judgment and decree filed in 2000, which provided, among other things, that Douglas pay child support to Kathy. In 2010, Douglas moved to modify his child-support obligation, arguing that certain distributions paid to Kathy as a shareholder of a closely-held subchapter S corporati

498 F.Supp.2d 402 (2007) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This Document Relates to City of New York et al. v. Abbott Laboratories, et al. Civ. Action No. 04-cv-06054, et al. County of Nassau v. Abbott Laboratories, et al. Civ. Action No. 05-cv-10179. MDL No. 1456, Civil Action No. 01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.<

520 F.Supp.2d 267 (2007) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This Document Relates to 01-CV-12257-PBS. M.D.L. No. 1456, Civil Action No. 01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 1, 2007. *268 Gary L. Azorsky, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Rebecca Bedwell-Col

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE HYUNDAI AND KIA FUEL No. 15-56014 ECONOMY LITIGATION, D.C. No. 2:13-ml-02424- KEHLIE R. ESPINOSA; NICOLE MARIE GW-FFM HUNTER; JEREMY WILTON; KAYLENE P. BRADY; GUNTHER KRAUTH; ERIC GRAEWINGHOLT; REECE PHILIP THOMSON; ALEX MATURANI; NILUFAR REZAI; JACK ROTTNER; LYDIA KIEVIT; REBECCA SANDERS; BOBBY BRANDON ARMSTRON

McLeese, Associate Judge: Petitioner Howard University Hospital (HUH) challenges an award of workers' compensation to intervenor James M. Lyles, Jr. We vacate and remand for further proceedings. I. Mr. Lyles worked for HUH as a radiological technician. In 2013, he felt pain in his right shoulder while lifting a patient to

ORDER In light of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub.L. No. 110-261, we remand this case to the district court. We retain jurisdiction over any further appeals.

OPINION OF THE COURT GIBBONS, Circuit Judge: The United States appeals from an order of the district court reversing a magistrate’s order that Howard Perry be held without bail pending disposition of a criminal complaint. The magistrate had jurisdiction to enter the detention order by virtue of 28 U.S.C.A. §

708 F.Supp.2d 110 (2010) In re BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 05-11934-DPW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 27, 2010. *113 David Pastor, Gilman and Pastor, LLP, Boston, MA, John C. Martland, Martland & Brooks LLP, Saugus, MA, David S. Nalven, Thomas M. Sobol, Hagens Berman Sobol

527 F.Supp.2d 209 (2007) In re TJX COMPANIES RETAIL SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 07-10162-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 18, 2007. Janet G. Abaray, Lopez, Hodes, Restaino, Milman & Skikos, Cincinnati, OH, William A. Baird, Launa Nicole Everman, Wayne S. Kreger, Milstein, Adelman & Kreger LLP, North Santa Monica, CA, Joh

455 F.Supp.2d 1033 (2006) Teodosia GROSZ, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. SACV 02-71 CJC MLGX. United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division. October 2, 2006. *1034 *1035 Andrew M. Volk, Craig R. Spiegel, Ivy D. Arai, Jeffrey T. Sprung, and Steve W.

DATE: 07/17/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:31:12 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 12312017 GROUP 3, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 17-AA-832 HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, PETITIONER, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT

*45 ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case presents a multidistrict, putative class action against AstraZeneca AB, Aktiebolaget Hassle, and Astrazeneea LP (collectively “AstraZeneca”), Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ranbaxy Inc. and Ran-baxy Laboratories Ltd. (collectively, “Ran-baxy”); Teva Pharmaceutical Indu

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................782 A. Factual Background.................... 782 B. Procedural Background.............................................

Opinion REARDON, J. —In this coordinated proceeding, certain purchasers of new automobiles in California (plaintiffs) brought state law claims against a number of automobile manufacturers and dealer associations under the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 16720-16728) and the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 17200-17210). Specifically,