⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kevin D Hackett”

Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014-08-06 · Published · cited 0× · 409 S.C. 297; 762 S.E.2d 387; 2014 WL 3844076; 2014 S.C. LEXIS 328
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court In the Interest of Kevin R., A Juvenile Under the Age of Seventeen, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-212655 Appeal From Richland County The Honorable Robert E. Newton, Family Court Judge The Honorable Gwendlyne Y. Smalls, Family Court Judge Opinion No. 27430 Heard April 16, 2014 – Filed August 6, 2014 AFFIRMED Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hacke
Hackett v. Milbankpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992-03-17 · Published · cited 3× · 181 A.D.2d 519; 581 N.Y.S.2d 35; 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3613
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered September 13, 1991, which granted petitioner’s application to permanently stay arbitration and denied his motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The IAS court properly stayed arbitration of the within claim that petitioner is entitled to certain payments upon withdrawing from respondent partnership. We
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2006-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
</
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2006-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-538-CR KEVIN BERNARD HACKETT APPELLANT A/K/A KEVIN B. HACKETT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-12-18 · Published · cited 11× · 123 F.4th 1005
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50142 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-03072- v. TWR-1 ANDREW HACKETT, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District o
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994-11-22 · Published · cited 0× · 209 A.D.2d 340; 619 N.Y.S.2d 548; 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11583
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edith Miller, J.), entered on December 3, 1993, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Miller, J., without costs and disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.
State v. Hackettpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002-09-03 · Published · cited 6× · 72 Conn. App. 127; 804 A.2d 225; 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 460
*129 Opinion LAVERY, C. J. The defendant, Kevin J. Hackett, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was under suspension in violation of General Statutes § 1.4-2152 where his license had been suspended for having operated a moto
Supreme Court of Florida · 2023-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2021-1204 ____________ KEVIN F. TOMLINSON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. August 24, 2023 COURIEL, J. Kevin Tomlinson threatened to ruin the reputation of two fellow real estate bro
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017-06-09 · Published · cited 27× · 2017 Neb. LEXIS 89; 296 Neb. 818; 896 N.W.2d 156
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 09/01/2017 09:11 AM CDT - 818 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports ACI WORLDWIDE CORP. v. BALDWIN HACKETT & MEEKS Cite as 296 Neb. 818 ACI Worldwide Corp., a Nebrask
People v. Hackettpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 1999-06-29 · Published · cited 13× · 596 N.W.2d 107; 460 Mich. 202
Weaver, C.J. The evidentiary question posed by this case is whether the trial court’s admission of testimony regarding defendant’s silence was proper.1 Defendant was convicted of delivery of 50 grams or more but less than 225 grams of cocaine.2 The Court of Appeals reversed defendant’s conviction, concluding that, although the
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2000-02-28 · Published · cited 6× · 87 F. Supp. 2d 1278; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6221; 2000 WL 245330
87 F.Supp.2d 1278 (2000) Patrick GILL, Plaintiff, v. THREE DIMENSION SYSTEMS, INC., Thomas M. Freyvogel, Comax, Katherine D. Freyvogel, and Daniel C. McGrogan, Defendants. No. 99-543-CIV-FTM-24(D). United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. February 28, 2000. *1279 *1280
In Re Proxim Corp.public domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2007-06-12 · Published · cited 1× · 369 B.R. 812; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 1987; 2007 WL 1697084
369 B.R. 812 (2007) In re PROXIM CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 05-11639(KG): United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. June 12, 2007. Austin Kesler Barron, O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, CA, for Intersil Corp. Charles J. Brown, Harvey, Pennington, Ltd., Wilmington, DE, for Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc. Howard A. Cohen, Drinker Biddle &
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010-11-08 · Published · cited 10× · 752 F. Supp. 2d 1254; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118362; 2010 WL 4639308
752 F.Supp.2d 1254 (2010) Karen E. RUSHING, as Clerk of the Circuit Court and County Comptroller of Sarasota County, Florida, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as successor-in-interest to Wachovia Bank, N.A., Defendant. Case No. 8:10-cv-1572-T-24-AEP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. November 8, 2010. *125
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013-06-14 · Published · cited 13× · 950 F. Supp. 2d 298; 2013 WL 2896806; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84368
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a case of first impression. Maeve and Jefflee Hermida (collectively, the “Hermidas”) brought this suit for declaratory judgment against their former landlord, ASN Reading LLC d/b/a Arch-stone Reading (“Archstone”) and fourteen *302other affilia
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2016-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 182 F. Supp. 3d 1124; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53681; 2016 WL 1588346
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Marsha J. Pechman, United States District Judge The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed: 1. Defendant King County’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 46), Plaintiffs’ Response (Dkt. No. 54), and Defendant’s Reply (Dkt. No. 56); 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011-11-29 · Published · cited 1× · 826 F. Supp. 2d 380; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136569; 2011 WL 5925529
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a case of first impression. The issue is one of statutory construction of a Massachusetts statute, a matter of law. Maeve and Jefflee Hermida (collectively, the “Hermidas”) bring this suit for declaratory judgment against their former landlord, ASN Reading LLC d/b/a Archstone Reading LLC (“Archstone Reading”) an
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013-02-28 · Published · cited 22× · 62 A.3d 1212; 2013 WL 772651; 2013 Del. LEXIS 109
RIDGELY, Justice: Plaintiff-below/Appellant Richard J. Sternberg, M.D. (“Sternberg”) brought an action against Defendants-below/Appellees Nanticoke Memorial Hospital, its CEO and members of the hospital’s Medical Executive Committee (“MEC”) (collectively “Nanticoke”) for tortious interference with existing business relationships, defamation, and breach of the Medical Staff Bylaws. His legal action arose from a precautionary
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003-09-04 · Published · cited 0× · 74 F. App'x 779
MEMORANDUM* I. OVERVIEW Joseph J. Janas (“the Trustee”) appeals the District Court’s reversal of the Bankruptcy Court’s decision and grant of summary judgment in favor of Reuter Equipment Company (“Reuter”). The Trustee seeks avoidance of certain payments made by the debtor to Reuter as preferential payments under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) (2001). Because we find that the payments meet the “co
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007-03-01 · Published · cited 1× · 371 Ill. App. 3d 755; 863 N.E.2d 1169
JUSTICE BOWMAN delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, Health Care Service Corporation, d/b/a BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois (HCSC), appeals from the trial court’s order denying in part its motion for sanctions pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137 (155 Ill. 2d R. 137). HCSC was sued by plaintiffs, Medic
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-03-16 · Published · cited 1× · 861 F. Supp. 2d 492; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35765; 2012 WL 895445
MEMORANDUM RE: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION BAYLSON, District Judge. I. Introduction If there is one sacred cow in the pasture of public education, it is the concept that public schools should stay open during the school year. The Chester Upland School District (“District”) filed this case when it was about to run out of operating funds in the middle of the sch