Cases

A certified copy of a certificate of conviction having been filed showing that Kevin C. Bryant was convicted of murder in the first degree, he is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys. Present— Pigott, Jr., PJ., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Order of suspension entered pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.20 (e). Present — Pine, J.E, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

(2008) Lamont BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. Juan GARDNER, et al., Defendants. No. 07 C 5909. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 21, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge. Lamont Bryant ("Plaintiff") brings this civil rights suit challenging his termination as the boys' varsity basketbal

(2008) Lamont BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. Juan GARDNER, et al., Defendants. No. 07 C 5909. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 7, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge. Lamont Bryant ("Plaintiff) brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 following his termination as boys' varsity basketbal

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The Governor of Mississippi and the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Human Services appeal a preliminary injunction. Because the plaintiffs do not have standing, we reverse the injunction and render a judgment of dismissal. I. A. The plaintiffs challenge t

JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge, joined by GRAVES, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: I respectfully dissent from the court’s refusal to consider en banc the important standing issue in this case. In my view, the panel opinion committed serious error in concluding that the plaintiffs lack standing to bring suit under the Establishment Clause. The plaintiffs argue that HB 1523, a Mis

STROUD, Judge. Plaintiff and defendants Bryant/Sutphin Properties, LLC and Donald H. Sutphin appeal. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s entry of an award for unfair or deceptive practice to Bryant/Sutphin Properties, LLC and affirm the trial court on all other issues raised by the parties. I. Background Plaintiff and defendant Bryant/Sutphin Properties, LLC (“BSP”)

219 S.W.3d 280 (2007) Ronald BRYANT, Claimant/Appellant, v. COLOR ART PRINTING, Employer/Respondent, Missouri Printing Industries Trust, Insurer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party. No. ED 88749. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. April 10, 2007. Susan L. Brown,

CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: This case, arising out of the Stanford International Bank Ponzi scheme, requires us to determine whether the Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act's good faith affirmative defense allows Defendants-Appellees to retain fraudulent transfers received while on inquiry notice of the Ponzi scheme. We hold it does not. We REVERSE the district court's judgment and RENDER judgment in favor of the Plaintiff-Appel

OPINION ROBB, Chief Judge. Case Summary and Issue The State of Indiana appeals from the trial court's order denying its request for restitution for damages paid under a judgment reversed by this court, raising the following issue for our review: whether *275the trial court improperly denied the State's request for restitution. Conc

PER CURIAM: The original opinion in this case was filed on January 9, 2019. Janvey v. GMAG, LLC, 913 F.3d 452 (5th Cir. 2019). There, we held that a transferee on inquiry notice of a transfer's fraudulent nature is not entitled to the Texas Uniform

ON MOTION TO DISMISS W. SHARP, Judge. Bryant petitions for judicial review of the Sheriffs Office’s revocation of his special process server appointment, because of alleged misconduct. The Sheriff moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. We grant the motion. The district courts of appeal have jurisdiction to review by way of plenary appeal, final “agency action”. § 120.68(2),

139 S.W.3d 688 (2004) The HILL AND GRIFFITH COMPANY, Adams & Coffey, P.C., and Pamela Neale Williams, Appellants, v. Lloyd BRYANT, C.V. Sessions, Jimmy Dell Wyatt, and Jimmie Harper, Appellees. Nos. 12-03-00091-CV, 12-03-00092-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. January 21, 2004. *690 Wade C. Crosnoe, John Sepehri, Thompson

French, Judge. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, John W. Ferron, appeals the judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court, which dismissed his complaint against defendant-appellee, Dish Network, L.L.C. (“Dish Network”). For the following reasons, we reverse in part and affirm in part the trial court’s judgment. {¶ 2} Ferron’s complaint alleged that Dish Network’s television advertisements for satellite televisio

ROBIN F. WYNNE, Associate Justice Kevin Hackie appeals from an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court dismissing his petition for judicial review of an administrative decision by Colonel William J. Bryant, in his capacity as the director of the Arkansas State Police, on the basis that the petition is barred by the state's sovereign immunity from suit. Col. Bryant cross-appeals from a portion of the order voiding his administrativ

: MANSFIELD, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part), I' agree that a new trial is required because the special verdict awarding $16,937.53 for past medical expenses is inconsistent with the special verdict awarding only á nominal one dollar for past pain and suffering. However, there is no reason for the new trial to encompass all damages. Everyone receiv

In re State of Louisiana;—Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 515-507; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2018-K-1038. Writ granted in part, and denied in part. The testimony that Defendant Kevin Bryant consented to the search is uncontested Therefore, the seized tickets are admissible. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

981 F.Supp. 1170 (1997) STATE OF ARKANSAS, ex rel. Winston BRYANT, Attorney General, v. The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY. Civil No. LR-C-96-1032. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. November 5, 1997. *1171 *1172 Charles L. Moulton, Kelly S. Murphy, Arkansas Atty. General's O

McCULLOUGH, Judge. *103 Defendant appeals from his convictions of possession of a firearm by a felon and discharging a weapon into an occupied dwelling. For the reasons stated herein, we find no plain error. I. Background On 19 Augu

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Feb 09 2017, 8:10 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals estoppel, or the law of