Cases

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kevin Lamont Darden appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Unit

O’CONNELL, J. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of two counts of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (1) and (4) and one count of conspiracy to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-59 and 53a-48 (a). *647The defendant’s first three claims

MCDONALD, J. The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly ordered a new trial rather than an evidentiary hearing after concluding that the trial court did not apply the Asherman1 balancing test to determine whether the failure of the state to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence deprived the defendant of due process under the Connecticut constitution. State

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On November 2, 2018, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Omnibus Order *706(Doc. No. 823) that resolved most of the pending motions in this case. The remaining Motions were set for oral arguments or evidentiary hearings, and they were held during the last week of November 2018.

VIRGINIA: In the Court of Appeals of Virginia on Tuesday the 7th day of January, 2020. Kevin Lamont Knight, a/k/a PUBLISHED Suge Knight, Petitioner, against Record No. 1162-18-1 Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondent.

Case: 16-11244 Document: 00514108559 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 9, 2017 No

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: Treating Defendants-Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The petition for rehearing en banc is also DENIED. The prior opinion, Darden v. City of Fort Worth, Tex.,

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Following a jury trial, Kevin Timothy Morrissey was convicted of one count of possession of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a)(4)(B), (b)(2) and one count of receipt of child pornography under

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0075p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ KEVIN B. BURNS, │ Petitioner-Appellant,

OPINION OWENS, Circuit Judge: California state prisoner Guy Kevin Rowland appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction for first degree murder and rape and his capital sentence. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND

OPINION DARDEN, Senior Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE In this discretionary interlocutory appeal, Kevin Moss challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss. We reverse and remand. ISSUE Moss raises one issue, which we restate as: whether the trial

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the district court’s order granting Andrews relief due to ineffective assistance of counsel at the penalty phase of his trial. , . Andrews was convicted of three heinous ■and appalling murders. His prior crimes were violent and antisocial. But due to defense counsel’s constitutionally inadequate penalty phase

OPINION CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge: Reynaldo Medrano Ayala appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. *1088 § 2254. Ayala was convicted of triple homicide in 1988, and he is currently on death row in California. He a

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEVIN COOK AND NICHOLE COOK ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0522-SG ) DEEP HOLE CREEK ASSOCIATES, a ) Delaware partnership, DEEP HOLE ) CREEK ASSOCIATES, INC., a ) Delaware corporation, LAURENCE L. ) BURKE and SUZANNE T. WAT

FILED OCTOBER 19, 2021 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WA

OPINION BAKER, Judge. In the instant case, the father of a teenage girl’s boyfriend invited her and two of her friends over to his house while his son was away. After the girls had arrived, he served them alcoholic beverages and then got into bed where his son’s girlfriend was sleeping and, without her consent, inserted his fingers into her vagina and rubbe

ORDER PER CURIAM. Plaintiff appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial in his personal injury action against defendant resulting from an automobile accident. The Court’s denial of plaintiffs new trial motion was a proper exercise of its discretion, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memora

430 B.R. 142 (2010) In re 15375 MEMORIAL CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. BEPCO, L.P., formerly known as Bass Enterprises Production Company, Defendant, GlobalSantaFe Corporation, GlobalSantaFe Corporate Services Inc. and Entities Holding, Inc., Intervenors. Bankruptcy No. 06-10859 (KG). Adversary No. 06-50822 (KG). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware

386 B.R. 548 (2008) In re 15375 MEMORIAL CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. BEPCO, L.P., formerly known as Bass Enterprises Production Company, Defendant, GlobalSantaFe Corporation, GlobalSantaFe Corporate Services Inc. and Entities Holding, Inc., Interveners. Bankruptcy No. 06-10859(KG). Adversary No. 06-50822(KG). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware.<