Cases

Per Curiam. Affirmed.1 See Llano Fin. Grp., LLC v. Yespy, 228 So.3d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). May, Klingensmith, and Kuntz, JJ., concur. . We note two distinctions between this case and Yespy, but they do not dictate a different result. First, the appraisal agreement's language was

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-00609-SCT INDIA GAMBRELL KERR v. WILLIAM JACK (BJ) KERR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/01/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. FRANKLIN C. McKENZIE, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: DANIEL KYLE ROBERTSON KRISTIN MICHELLE McGEE CAROL ANN ESTES BUSTIN

[Cite as Kerr v. OhioHealth Corp., 2022-Ohio-2697.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Durbin W. Kerr, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 21AP-403 v. : (C.P.C. No. 19CV-9117) OhioHealth Corporation et al.,

[Cite as Kerr v. Mid-Am. Mgt. Corp., 2012-Ohio-2632.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97571 STEVE KERR, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS v

OPINION ON REHEARING TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice. After reconsidering our prior opinion on appellees’ motions for rehearing and motions for rehearing en banc, we deny the motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc,1 withdraw our February 26, 2004 opinion and judgment, and substitute the following in their place. A jury found several defendants negligent in th

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LLANO FINANCING GROUP LLC, Appellant, v. JAMES E. KERR and MELISSA ANNE TRAINOR, Appellees. No. 4D16-1432 [November 29, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circ

229 S.W.3d 407 (2007) BASTIAN MATERIAL HANDLING, L.L.C., Appellant, v. STELLUTI KERR, L.L.C., Appellee. No. 11-06-00128-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. May 10, 2007. *409 Jody D. Jenkins, McCleskey, Harriger, Brazill & Graf, L.L.P., Lubbock, for appellant. Zollie C. Steakley, Steakley, Wetsel & Carmichael,

Opinion filed May 10, 2007

McCLENDON, Chief Justice. This case involves the right of Mrs. Fidelia Maniré (appellant) to letters of administration upon the estate of L. W. Maniré, deceased. Mrs. Maniré asserts that right on the ground that she is the surviving common law wife of decedent, that relation having been established after she and decedent were divorced on August 3, 1928. The probate court appointed her administratrix; and the temporary administ

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-01-206-CV ROBERT GROSS, M.D., APPELLANTS ALL SAINTS INTEGRATED AFFILIATES D/B/A ALL SAINTS MEDICAL AS

217 Va. 88 (1976) GEORGE L. OLEYAR, JR. v. ELAINE W. KERR, TRUSTEE, ETC., ET AL. Record No. 750876. Supreme Court of Virginia. June 11, 1976. Present, All the Justices. Action for negligence of an attorney in the performance of professional services, while sounding in tort, is an action for breach of contract and thus governed by statute of limitations applic

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge. These are cross-appeals from a decree declaring certain transfers and mortgages of. lands in Steele county, in the state of North Dakota, fraudulent and void against the creditors of Bartholomew Pickert, quieting (subject to the performance of a prescribed condition) Lynch’s title to these lands, obtained through execution sales upon judgments against-Bartholomew Pickert, and dismissing Burt’s cross-

The city of Cleveland, during the month of April, 1942, purchased and, since that time, has operated the street-car system situated in greater Cleveland. The charter of the city of Cleveland, as amended by Section 113-2, to provide for the purchase of the railway system, establishes a Transit Board of three men to direct its operation. The Cleveland Railway *Page 453 Company, the predecessor owner of the system, carried fire and extended coverage insuranc

FRICK, C. J. The plaintiff in Ms complaint in substance alleged that on May 1, 1915, one Bowman was the owner of a certain farm or tract of land and of certain personal property which plaintiff was desirous of purchasing for the sum of $7,500; that in order to accomplish his purpose he employed the defendant as his agent to purchase said farm and personal property from said Bowman for said sum of $7,500; that plaintiff furnish

The plaintiff alleged that in December, 1918, he rented a farm from the defendant for the cultivation of certain crops during the year 1919; that he agreed to plant ten acres in tobacco, ten in cotton, ten in corn, and ten in wheat, on certain conditions or agreements, which are fully stated in the complaint. He alleged that the defendant in several respects had failed to comply with his contract; that he had sold a part of the plaintiff's crop of tobacco, and had refused to account for all t

99 U.S. 180 (____) BURT v. PANJAUD. Supreme Court of United States. Mr. H. Bisbee, Jr., for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James M. Baker, contra. MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court. This was an action of ejectment brought in the Circuit Court of St. John's County, Florida, by Maria M. Panjaud, to recover the possession of two lots or parcels of

Stockton, J. I. Judgment was rendered against the defendants by default. It is first objected by the appellants, that the court erred in rendering a judgment against Luther Burt, for the reason that the notice was to him by his real name, and the return of the sheriff *58shows that the notice was served on “ L. Burt.” We think that this objection is not well taken. The dist

TRIEBER, District Judge (after stating the facts as above). In the presentation of this cause, counsel confined themselves strictly to those questions of law which are debatable for a want of harmony among the adjudicated cases, agreeing on others which are well settled, thereby relieving the court of including in its opinion matter which would only be a repetition of well-settled principles of law. Such conduct of counsel is com

The Vice-Chancellor : In deciding this case, I am content to follow the doctrine of the supreme court of Ohio, in Winton v. Cornish, 5 Ohio Rep. 303. In that case, there had been a lease of a cellar and a room over it in the corner of a building several stories high, which was destroyed by fire. After the destruction, the lessee erected a small building on the site of the cellar and room, and of a hei

803 F.2d 987 55 USLW 2266 Ruth CLARK and Charles E. Bunker, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.CITY OF LOS ANGELES and the Los Angeles Police Department,Defendants-Appellants.Ruth CLARK and Charles E. Bunker, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF LOS ANGELES; City Attorney Burt Pines;Councilwoman Pat Russell; Los Angeles Police Dept.;L.A.P.D. Officer Smith (Ser. # 20585); Officer JohnD'Amicus; Offi