Cases

STATON, Judge. Debra Kern (“Mother”) appeals the termination of her parental rights in K.H., born December 22, 1984. Mother presents three issues for our review: I.Whether IND. CODE 31-6-5-4, providing for the filing of a petition for the termination of parental rights by a court appointed special advocate, is unconstitutional. II.Whether K.H.’s court appointed s

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Lawrence J. O’Neill, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case arises from the in-custody death of David S. Silva (“Silva” or “the Decedent”). Plaintiffs bring the instant civil rights action against the arresting officers, alleging excessive force under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law causes of act

#29004-r-SRJ 2020 S.D. 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. VINCENT WOLF, Defendant and Appellee. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL C

OPINION OF THE COURT Alexander, J. On this appeal, defendants assert a right, through the *643mechanism of the peremptory challenge, to exclude persons of a particular race from service on a criminal jury. We hold today that such racial discrimination has no place in our courtrooms and that such conduct by defense counsel is prohibited by both the Ci

Wolf v Imus (2019 NY Slip Op 02173) Wolf v Imus 2019 NY Slip Op 02173 Decided on March 21, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

OPINION OF THE COURT Mollen, P. J. This appeal arises out of the highly publicized confrontation between a group of white teen-agers and three black men during the early morning hours of December 20, 1986, in Howard Beach, Queens County, which resulted in the death of one of the black men, Michael Griffith and the severe beating of his companion, Cedric Sandiford. The three defendants involved in this app

44 Cal.App.4th 346 (1996) 51 Cal. Rptr.2d 666 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., LOCAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF KERN et al., Defendants and Respondents; LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Docket No. F024311. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District. April 9, 19

66 Md. App. 441 (1986) 504 A.2d 1154 JEANETTE M. KERN v. SOUTH BALTIMORE GENERAL HOSPITAL. No. 766, September Term, 1985. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 14, 1986. Andre' R. Weitzman, Baltimore, for appellant. Jeanne Phelan (Russell H. Gardner and Wolf, Pokempner & Hillman, on brief), Baltimore, for appellee.

James E. Wolf appeals the trial court's order of January 8, 1987, sustaining appellee Northmont City Schools' motion for summary judgment and overruling appellant's motion for summary judgment. Appellant seeks participation in the Workers' Compensation Fund for psychological injuries received while working for his former employer, Northmont City Schools. The claim for workers' compensation benefits stems from appellant's janitorial position at O.R. Eddington School, where he allegedly

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant Richard D. Kern appeals from the March 26, 2002 judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (William M. Skretny, Judge), dismissing, on Younger abstention grounds, his complaint against defendants-appellees Frank J. Clark, III, the District Attorney for Erie County, and Assi

Wolf v St. Vincent's Catholic Med. Ctrs. of N.Y. (2019 NY Slip Op 03293) Wolf v St. Vincent's Catholic Med. Ctrs. of N.Y. 2019 NY Slip Op 03293 Decided on April 30, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT McKINNEY, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The issues raised have been briefed and are ready for resolution. For the reasons set forth, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgement is DENIED, and defendants’, the Retirement Plan for Employees of L.B.R., Inc., L.B.R., Inc., Renner’s Express, Inc., Lewis B. R

Denham, Wolf Real Estate Servs., Inc. v 60-74 Gansevoort St. LLC (2020 NY Slip Op 01576) Denham, Wolf Real Estate Servs., Inc. v 60-74 Gansevoort St. LLC 2020 NY Slip Op 01576 Decided on March 10, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department

125 N.W.2d 149 (1963) Gordon KERN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ART SCHIMKAT CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., a South Dakota Corporation, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, and Appellant, v. Cale DICKEY, Third-Party Defendant and Respondent. No. 8016. Supreme Court of North Dakota. December 18, 1963. *150 Anderson & Wolf, Bisma

Opinion by Wright, J., We are here concerned with a dispute over the distribution of the proceeds of a sheriff’s sale of real estate on a writ of fieri facias. The sheriff’s schedule of distribution, after providing for costs and taxes, called for payment of the entire balance to the Farmers National Bank of Pennsburg, hereinafter referred to as Farmers, on whose judgment the writ had issued. Exceptions were fi

Plaintiff, Florence A. Thiel, seeks recovery for personal injuries, loss of earnings and expenses resulting from an accident caused by defective steps of an apartment building, a portion of which she occupied as her residence. Miss Thiel, with her mother and cousin, occupied under a written contract of lease which had been executed by her brother Walter E. Thiel with defendants, one of the two upper apartments in a building which contained four apartments, plaintiff's apartment bearing the No

104 Cal.Rptr.2d 875 (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 878 WALLICH'S RANCH CO., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE KERN COUNTY CITRUS PEST CONTROL DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. F032923. Court of Appeal, Fifth District. March 9, 2001. *876 Brian C. Leighton, Clovis, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Ka

Me. Justice del Tobo delivered the opinion of the court.. Herminio Díaz Navarro filed a petition in this court for a writ of mandamus directed to the Attorney General of Porto Bico commanding him to order the delivery of the notarial protocols of the district of San Juan to the petitioner. In his petition he alleg-es the following': “That, as is shown by the records of

El Juez Asociado Se. del Tobo, emitió la opinión del tribunal. Herminio Díaz Navarro presentó a esta Corte Suprema nn escrito solicitando la expedición de nn auto de mandamus ordenando al Attorney General de Puerto Rico que disponga la entrega al peticionario de los protocolos notariales del Distrito de San Juan. El peticionario alega en su escrito lo que sigue:

Davis, J. The foundation of this action is a promissory note, executed by the appellee to the appellant. The appellee answered in four paragraphs: 1. General denial. 2. Payment. 3. Failure of consideration. The fourth is substantially the same as the third. To the second paragr